
More and more women — frustrated with a government they feel is out of touch with voters, backdoor decisions not debated in a public forum, and the interconnectedness of lobbyists, fossil fuel industry representatives and rich donors — are putting themselves up for a position in politics.
These women, ranging from former Liberal Natalie Baini to businesswoman Allegra Spender and former journalist Zoe Daniel, are running either as independents or with smaller parties in the upcoming election to challenge the status quo. The most recent to join their ranks is former columnist Jane Caro, who yesterday announced she’d be running for the Senate with the Reason Party.
But why are so many women stepping up to the plate now — and do they really represent a threat to Australia’s two-party system?
What’s the driver?
There’s an undercurrent of anger for many independent candidates. Watching from the sidelines as the government bungled its bushfire response, COP22, March4Justice and assault allegations, they felt the Coalition was failing over and over again.
Get Crikey FREE to your inbox every weekday morning with the Crikey Worm.

Caro flirted briefly with the idea of entering the 2018 race as an independent against Tony Abbott but stepped down so as not to split the vote. This time, she’s going hell for leather.
“Watching this government, I’ve just become furious but also spirited and disgusted,” Caro tells Crikey.
“I think that a lot of people, progressive people, people who care about our planet, and women, in particular, are feeling under threat.”
But it’s not just the current government at fault: many independents believe Australia’s democratic system is failing, brought about by heavy-handed major parties out of touch with voters, using wedge politics to stop any kind of progression and preselecting their popular favourites instead of who is best for the role.
Former newspaper columnist Elizabeth Farrelly, who is running as an independent candidate for Strathfield, NSW, tells Crikey she’s seen these failures firsthand. In 2018 she was approached by the Labor party to join with hints at running for the federal seat of Reid — before quickly realising that no matter how well she resonated with voters, it was up to powerful Labor figures to decide her fate.
“There were no preselection battles … and once I left, party members were vindictive. There was nastiness everywhere, which surprised me,” she said.
“It was arrogant … and my treatment afterwards was unjustified and unwarranted, and, for me, reinforced my initial sense that both of the major parties are especially out of touch with the electorate.”
Does feminism play a role?
The Me Too movement exposed a dark and prevalent culture of sexual abuse and harassment in Australia, bolstered by prominent survivors including Grace Tame, Brittany Higgins and Kate, who accused Christian Porter of rape — which he strenuously denies — publicly telling their story.
Farrelly believes the current feminist movement in Australia is 20-30 years overdue, with progression stalled following former minister for women Tony Abbott’s reign.
“We should be ashamed of how backwards it all is,” she said. “There’s a lot of hatred to women and we need to address it because it disempowers men as well as women.”
Speaking on a Crikey Talks panel last night, Jo Dyer, outgoing director of Adelaide Writers’ Week and independent candidate for Boothby in South Australia, said the movement had played an important role in galvanising and amplifying independents. She was a childhood friend of Kate, whose 51st birthday it would have been yesterday.
“Women are sick of waiting for power to be shared and they understand that now they need to get in there and take it,” she said. Dyer believes the movement showed older women that daily harassment wasn’t something they just had to live with.
“There’s a generation of women saying, ‘We are not going to accept the shame … and we will find a voice to lay the shame where it belongs, which is back with the perpetrator.’”
She said this became particularly apparent after Scott Morrison announced his support for Porter despite Kate’s allegation.
“We hear the rhetoric all the time from people, including the prime minister, who was saying, ‘We need to hear your stories, we need to listen to what women are saying’,” Dyer said.
“But when there’s a very specific story, which doesn’t suit our political agenda, then we are going to dismiss it.”
What outcome do they want?
Farrelly, Caro and Dyer are each progressives who have previously supported the Labor party. But they each want a different outcome in the upcoming election: Dyer believes a Labor majority with an independent crossbench would be the best outcome; Caro simply wants the current government to go — and would like to see a Labor prime minister — while Farrelly believes a hung Parliament would be a fantastic outcome.
“These independent women are actually independent,” she said. “They’re going to work according to principle and not along party lines, which means each vote has a conscience vote.”
But whether the scores of independents rushing to the political field will actually be a threat to the government remains to be seen. Already it appears some Liberals are squirming: Tim Wilson has asked constituents to dob in people erecting Zoe Daniel political signs early, while the Morrison government has attempted to frame the independents as a front for Labor.
While Caro believes independents have been underestimated, she said the level of support she was receiving online showed many candidates were getting the attention they deserved.
“The tone has been, ‘Oh, at last, someone I’d actually want to vote for’,” she said.
Leave a comment
And I, for one, welcome our new feminist overlords.
Having more independent women in politics can only be a good thing. I look forward to it.
Jane will get a vote from me, and I am a lifelong Labor supporter. I have spent up big on Climate200 aswell, the more successful Teal candidates we have, the better our government work.
Go girls, and into the bin with conservative dinosaurs and criminals.
Good on you Fairmind. I am more than happy to support your comment with a positive vote and a positive post. At the time of writing this there were two red ‘down-votes’. (Wait until you see how many negative votes I attract with this post!!)
There is a strong contingent of ALP voters here at Crikey. If you do not tow the ALP line they get upset very easily and sometimes rather nasty; but do not worry, they are all ‘paper tigers’. (As the lyrics of the old song goes, “Their roar is much worse than their bite. Here, kitty, kitty!!)
I have a Teal candidate standing in my electorate and I wear a tee-shirt with her name on it every morning when I am out on my geriatric walk, (just to ‘fly the flag’ for her). The ALP is irrelevant in my electorate. I ought to know, I have lived here for over 70 years and I spent 16 of those years as a paid-up member of the ALP trying to see the seat go to Labor. But I gave that fruitless task away after Hawke and Keating became de facto Liberals.
Very true. I imagine most progressives hope for an ALP government above an LNP one, but that doesnt mean the ALP are the only voice on the progressive side of politics, indeed in some areas they more than happily tow the mega corporate line. They dont own lower house seats yet their vitriol when the Greens or progressive independents stand is quite appalling, not to mention undemocratic. We’d all be a lot better off if that energy was directed at the Tories rather than those to the left of them.
Dyer believes the movement showed older women that daily harassment wasn’t something they just had to live with.
Yep. I’m 80 and can be counted in that group. I hold all of Grace Tame, Brittany Higgins, Saxon Mullins, Chanel Contos, Kate and Alex Eggerking in very high regard. I see the major political parties losing support because of their continuing failure to recognise the differing experiences and viewpoints of women and to include these in their policies.
can’t believe the down-voting on comments that are supportive of independents and independent women candidates.
do any of the down-voters want to actually comment, and make a case for their opinions?
There is only one down vote on one comment as of my writing.
It exposes a fundamental flaw in the Comments section, which I have already complained about to Crikey to no avail.
That is, that down-votes and up-votes cancel each other out, so that the most furiously contested comment might well end up with a zero.
yes, they’ve mostly gone now! when i first read the article, just about all of them had minus 2, like a couple of people had just gone down the comments in a down-voting spree.
agree with you about the pluses and negs cancelling one another out, being an odd system. I wonder if Crikey could explain that one to us?
The utter obduracy of the failure, despite constant complaint from many, long suffering, subscribers, to update the clunky system installed on the cheep-cheep too many years ago is not conducive to continued support when so many other sites, such as P&I, IA or KangarooCourt could do so much more with so little.
It can be very hard to see any reason for the voting sometimes. And it’s not that useful that all votes look just the same no matter what motivates them: is it the presence or lack of logic, knowledge, wit, partisan prejudice, elegance, hyper-emotion, exposition, relevance… ? How about having votes in defined categories, such as the marks for ‘artistic interpretation’?
Occasionally the voting appears to be just perversity, or spite, or vandalism, arriving in waves. Perhaps the site would be better without voting, so those who want to express a view on any comment would need to compose something intelligible. That could give an insight into the thinking. On the other hand it might just flood the site with comments borrowed from a pantomime: Oh yes it is! – Oh no it isn’t!…
But sometimes someone writes exactly what I was going to write myself, so instead of repeating it, I upvote theirs.
Click! Especially when they say it better!
Have an upvote.