After compiling a detailed dossier of Scott Morrison’s lies and falsehoods, we were naturally anxious to hear his response to them — whether he wanted to argue the toss over them, or explain how in fact he hadn’t been lying, or was correct in his factual claims.

But we also wanted to know about Morrison’s attitude toward lying as a political practice — after all, politicians of all stripes are renowned for distorting the truth, and no side has a monopoly on blatant untruths. (Remember the role Labor’s Mediscare played in the 2016 election?)

On Monday morning we presented the dossier of Morrison’s lies and falsehoods to the Prime Minister’s Office and invited them to respond to a series of questions, then followed up last night. As is so often the case with the Morrison government, there was simply no response. As Crikey goes to press today (Thursday), we are still waiting.

Here’s what we asked:

Save up to 50% on a year of Crikey

Choose what you pay, from $99.

Sign up now
  • Does the PM dispute the characterisation of any of these as lies and falsehoods?
  • Does the PM wish to correct the record in relation to any of these statements beyond the two instances where he has admitted being wrong?
  • Does the PM believe the telling of lies degrades public trust in politicians and the political process?
  • Does the PM see stating falsehoods or misrepresenting facts as a legitimate tool in political debate, or one that all sides engage in?
  • Does the PM believe a politician conveying lies and misinformation in public is a moral or ethical issue, or only a political issue?
  • Does the PM believe that as the nation’s leader, he has a particular obligation to observe high standards of accuracy in his public statements, or should he merely observe the same standards as apply generally to politicians?
  • What would the PM advise children, including his own, about the upside and downside of telling lies?

A method of political communication that involves a ready recourse to lies and refuses to engage with the substance of political debate or legitimate media questions — a practice by no means confined to the government’s treatment of Crikey — might be regarded as smart tactics.

But it paints a bleak picture of politics — of a government with virtually nothing to say except words intended to deceive.

The article was first published on Tuesday May 25. It was updated on Wednesday May 26 and Thursday May 27

I subscribe to Crikey because I believe in a free, open and independent media where news and opinions can be published that I can both agree with and be challenged by.

As a Crikey subscriber I always feel more informed and able to think more critically about issues and current affairs – even when they don’t always reflect my own political viewpoint or lived experience.

Jess
Singapore

Join us and save up to 50%

Subscribe before June 30 and choose what you pay for a year of Crikey. Save up to 50% or, chip in extra and get one of our limited edition Crikey merch packs.

Join Now