Last week, Archbishop of Brisbane Mark Coleridge penned this tweet: “A Church which says we can’t ordain women is equally obliged to ask how we might include women in leadership…’’
Never has that need been greater. The dearth of female leaders in our all-boys schools — both in the Catholic system and the wider independent sector — is a traditional misogyny that must be addressed. And it must be addressed now, to help forge a change in a culture which has broken the spirits and futures of too many young women.
Coleridge, a forward thinker despite his Church not always being that way, is an alumnus of St Kevin’s College, the exclusive Catholic private boys school in Toorak, Melbourne. This is the school, run by Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA), that has been mired in controversy in recent times, including an incident where a swag of male students were filmed on a tram chanting filth about women.
Its new principal Deborah Barker was appointed on the back of that scandal; the first woman to hold the position in the school’s 100-plus year history. She was seen as part of the antidote to a culture that had seriously damaged the St Kevin’s brand. Not that the school or EREA has ever trumpeted that fact. Indeed, a search of the school’s website shows it’s not an appointment the school is really acknowledging.
Barker was announced last year, but still does not even appear listed as the school principal; it’s the acting deputy principal who features at the top of the St Kevin’s leadership team tree — though the school confirmed she is the head when contacted via phone.
No doubt exists that St Kevin’s needs the strong influence of a talented female educator to drive cultural change. But what we saw there tells a story of other boys’ schools across the nation, where deep-seated sexism and misogyny is prompting thousands of schoolgirls to come forward with stories of sexual abuse, harassment and rape.
Barker appears to be the only female head of a significant private or faith-based all-boys school in Australia. The only one. (And if you can think of another outside of the state sector, where there are a handful, please let me know!)
On the other hand, a male head of an all-girls’ school is not out of the ordinary. Sometimes it’s even sought. Indeed, of all the all-girls’ schools in Australia, there are about 16 male principals out of 157 across state, Catholic and private institutions.
Many girls’ schools also have several males as part of their leadership team, and actively seek male influences inside the classroom and in extra-curricular activities ranging from sport to public speaking.
That’s because it is understood that our teenagers gain from having both female and male role models and perspectives. A girl’s education shouldn’t be delivered only by women, and a boys education shouldn’t be delivered only by men.
The lack of women in leadership positions needs to change, and it starts with curbing the influence of old boys’ networks whose stakeholder status is often prioritised. Our all-boys’ schools need to look more to the future and less to the past.
You can see it in the subjects offered, and in the schools’ wealth base, and in the donations and bequests of families. You can see it right up at the top, in the principal’s office.
Every industry has faced disruption in recent years — traditional all-boys’ schools, built on historical networks and outdated culture, need to face their own disruption.
That doesn’t mean a gender-aware man can’t be an excellent all-boys’ school leader, but surely it means a woman can do the same job — if they were just given the chance.
Will more women in leadership positions fix the cultural problem in all-boys’ schools? Let us know your thoughts by writing to [email protected]. Please include your full name to be considered for publication in Crikey’s Your Say section.
Follow the team that follows the money
Nobody digs into corruption in this country better than Crikey does.
Now we’re digging even deeper with our new multi-part series, The Dirty Country: Corruption in Australia, where our team lifts the lid on corruption, telling us how it’s done, who wins and what it costs.
Get involved. Follow the team that follows the money. Save 50% on a year of Crikey — that’s just $99 for an annual membership — when you subscribe today with the promo code CORRUPTION.
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey
Leave a comment
Madonna, please be aware that Vittoria Lavorato is the new principal of St Patrick’s College, Strathfield, another Edmund Rice school.
This single appointment doubles the number of women principals of major boys’ private schools, which underlines how far there is to go. Given that education is a major field of women’s expertise, this is a depressing reality.
Does Berwick Grammar School, the brother school of St Margarets School in Victoria, count?
St Margarets is co-ed at junior level and girls only at senior level – boys move to BGS for their senior schooling.
Annette Rome is head of both schools.
It depends whether you count BGS as a separate school, or the boys campus of St Margarets.
FWIW.
I’ve seen some pretty bad behaviour from students of an equivalent girls’ school on a bus in Melbourne.
We’re surely trying to get past the “they did it too” excuse? That’s partly what’s keeping the women embroiled in the whole sordid culture! If it’s wrong, call it but don’t make it semi-ok because ” they did it too”!
The best way to analyse an issue is to list the qualifications and experience for comparison rather than to compare XX chromosome to XY chromosome equivalence in a job. But that is not what journalism is – it is to create controversy so the news outlet be read the next day.
But clearly merit isn’t being applied, or it is but just for one gender. Or perhaps women just aren’t applying, which suggests other problems, or perhaps, as you seem to imply, women just aren’t qualified and experienced, but that last one just looks exceedingly unlikely.
you are correct – do we know who have applied, what were the competing qualifications and experience – but the point is chromosomes should be no indicia for or against
List the qualifications and experience of whom? Listing the qualifications and experience of all the men who are principals of an all-boys school, gives precious little insight into the question at hand: are the schools selecting optimally.
Listing the qualifications and experience of all the men who could be principals of an all-boys school, is a tad more complicated. It requires us to make value judgements: who do we include in the “could be”-group?
Just in case you actually want to engage in debate, rather than shut it down, how about you let us know whose qualifications and experiences you wish to know about?
Gah – of course I meant “of all the men and women who could be principals of an all-boys school.
qualifications and experience of whom ? — the applicants of course. -not theoretical construct of people qualified but not actually interested.
What does this have to do with “interested”? The question is wholly about whether *students* are being given the best *education*, not whether *women* are given the best *career opportunities*. So, no – applicants isn’t a particularly meaningful group. If for whatever reason qualified and experienced women “aren’t interested” in being teachers at boy schools, that’s a problem *for the boys* that the schools ought to address.
A greek all boys school in Adelaide did have a female principal for a few years. She has retired now and they now have a man again so it shows the greeks are open to it.