Why the Shorten and Porter cases are different — and why that’s not the point
Note: this story discusses sexual assault.
At the last federal election, I voted for the Labor candidate in my electorate. I am not a member of any party. I voted Labor, because it at least promised some policies to give our planet a fighting chance.
I did not know at that time of the rape allegations against Bill Shorten, which I now know he has strenuously denied. I am not sure why I didn’t know. Partly, Shorten’s case was reported differently in the media than in the case of the allegations against Christian Porter.
You've reached your article limit. Sign up to create a free account. You will receive our free newsletters in your inbox and extended article access by submitting your email.
Already a subscriber? Log in to continue reading.
Comments