From London to Tokyo to Washington this week there’s been yet another wave of reckoning for powerful men behaving badly.
But for the woke brigade it’s been a mixed week, with not all the scalps being the ones they expected.
Let’s start with London with the demise of a powerful corporate leader. Unlike many other cases, this did not involve groping, dick-pics or any harassment allegations — it was just your basic boorish, middle-aged executive blowing himself up with his own words.
Put a fork in them, the election is almost done.
Understand what happens next with our best ever discounts.
The fact he is also an Australian adds piquancy.
UK KPMG chair Bill Michael resigned after a recent town hall morale meeting with staff where he told them to “stop playing the victim card” and accused them of “moaning” about their lockdown conditions.
To make matters worse he boasted about meeting clients for coffee — in direct contravention of the UK lockdown laws — and even appeared to be encouraging others to follow suit.
And for good measure the rant added that he thought the whole concept of unconscious bias was “complete and absolute crap”. (The bias about the fact he is an Aussie has certainly not been unconscious.)
Fleet Street and the financial press have relished Michael’s image as a brash, tough-talking, hard-drinking ocker. Note this from the staid Daily Telegraph’s Ben Marlow about an interview with Michael:
Having experienced his plain-speaking at first hand, it doesn’t come as a huge surprise. Even first thing in the morning, Michael speaks like a man on his fourth espresso, or pint — he’s a salt-of-the-earth Aussie, after all.
On that occasion, over croissants and coffee in the West End, he dropped the F-bomb so frequently that even this proud son of Grimsby, a town where the F-word is used like punctuation, may have blushed slightly.
You can almost picture Marlow having to clutch for the smelling salts after his encounter with the uncouth colonial.
There is a certain schadenfreude in Michael’s demise. Plenty in and outside the company had been expecting it since he was appointed in 2017 as a “wartime leader” to shake up the big four accounting firm.
Mission accomplished. He’s certainly shaken things up — but there might need to be a reckoning in the UK corporate world and financial press about stereotyping Australian corporate leaders as foul-mouthed drunken dinosaurs.
That was just some of the old AMP board. He seems to be channeling the John Fraser school of management.
Meanwhile in Japan, the head of the Tokyo Olympics stepped down over sexist remarks he made about women, claiming female board members “talked too much” and made meetings “drag on”.
The fact the culprit was 83-year-old former PM Yoshiro Mori made his demise all the more significant.
But the most shocking scandal of the past week has been in Washington DC with the implosion of the Lincoln Project, the much-hyped political action committee set up by a group of powerful conservatives to bring down Donald Trump.
The group was a media darling during the 2020 election, with its powerful television ads and woke messaging. But now we now learn that behind the scenes the Lincoln Project was almost as offensive and dysfunctional as the Trump White House.
In recent weeks cofounder John Weaver has been accused of allegedly sexually harassing nearly two dozen young men and boys via inappropriate messages and texts.
Any hopes the left wing media would protect the organisation have evaporated as an avalanche of damaging stories has emerged, showing the accusations date back months and are just part of a “toxic” workplace and a pattern of “infighting, sexist language and disparate treatment”.
The Lincoln Project directors have now rushed for the exit, including cofounder Steve Schmidt and George Conway, husband of Trump supporter Kellyanne Conway. There are now questions about what has happened to the US$90 million in funds the group raised.
It’s getting hard to keep up with it all.
SALE ENDS MIDNIGHT
Expect more from your journalism.
Crikey is an independent Australian-owned and run outfit. It doesn’t enjoy the vast resources of the country’s main media organisations. We take seriously our responsibility to bear witness.
I hope you appreciate our reporting and consider supporting Crikey’s work. Join now for your chance at election themed merch.
Editor-in-chief
Leave a comment
Bill Michael: it’s Sir Les Patterson reincarnated.
“the woke brigade”. Really? Such a lazy generalisation. What next? “Rent-a-crowd” at the storming of the Capitol?
No : just for BLM; at least in Oz.
Actually most protests that I have witnessed here in Oz are undertaken (at least partially) by “Rent A Rabble”. You see the same faces regardless of the cause. Rent A Rabble is well and truly alive in Oz.
Oh balderdash, as they used to say.
An aboriginal death was off the page in a matter of hours until a cop interfered with the neck of a petty criminal by the name of Mr George Floyd who also had a felonies for robbery with violence, deprivation of liberty and sexual assault. Yes or No?
As you say : it has been a mixed bag for “woke”
Ever been to a Tupperware meeting? I had to attend one to satisfy the warranty requirements for a replacement of an item.
I have been a former treasurer of yacht clubs an cricket clubs (to name two civil positions) and with reference to the Tupperware meeting I concur with the assessment that [female members “talked too much” and made meetings “drag on”].
Michael could have “played it better” but we have a new tyranny now eh?
You went to one meeting (of a rather social nature, as opposed to say a formal governance type meeting) where in your opinion some women talked too much. Well, that settles it. Case closed.
In my experience practically every meeting goes on far too long thanks to pointless rambling interjections and incompetent chairing that fails to keep discussion on topic. None of it has anything to do with the sex of the participants.
Studies have been done, examining recordings of meetings in which women were held to have “talked too much” in which measurements showed that in fact men talked far more.
Indeed. Presumably on those occasions ‘talked too much’ denotes ‘talked (at all)’.
I have not seen any such papers and I do have an academic interest in such matters. In any event, the content would have to have been taken to account.
Even a first year textbook on management will emphasise differences in the perceptions of the work place between males and females.
Males tend to consider the work place from a functional perspective and evaluate success as the project working as designed and being within specification.
Females, in the main, consider the social environment as being at least as important as their job.
Guys are able to work with people that they do not particularly like (for 8 hours) whereas such becomes a major issue for female staff – often requiring a change of station or location or they tend not to hang about.
Fair point. Although the husband of the hostess would afford me regular “knowing” glances over the career of the Tupperware meeting.
Gender doesnt come into it. You simply need a Chairperson who ensures the participants stick to the Agenda. Anyone who attended meetings that I chaired knew full well that Meetings are for updates and decisions not for conversations. You have your “I need to discuss this” conversations before or after the meeting not during.
KPMG, just one of the four vampire squids sucking the life out of democratic capitalism, as though it needed help.
The big four are just a conglomerate of b*stardry incorporated.
Not sure why Janine thought the left, such as it is in the US, would defend the Lincoln Project. While they undoubtedly enjoyed some of the harsher ads their commentary was mainly that this group was trying to salvage what it could of the deeply corrupt corporate Republican party and therefore did not deserve left wing support.