Bridget McKenzie
(Image: AAP/Daniel Pockett)

Scott Morrison will be desperately hoping the media’s traditional obsession with political personalities over systems and structures will apply to the sports rorts scandal — and that the sacking of Bridget McKenzie will bring an end to it before parliament begins this week.

Given how systematic the rort was, that shouldn’t be the case — and the outrageous “review” by Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary Phil Gaetjens that allegedly cleared McKenzie of everything but a trivial technical breach over a gun club membership should serve to focus on how deeply corrupt this government is.

McKenzie was only ever rorter inter pares, the minister who signed off — without legal authority — on the rorts, but it would have been anyone occupying that role in the lead-up to the election.

See how power works in this country.

News done fearlessly. Join us for just $99.

JOIN US

The whole community sports infrastructure grants program was designed to be a rort from the outset — that’s why an existing sports infrastructure program doing the same thing was ignored. That’s why it was given to the Sports Commission, a body outside the grant guidelines that apply to the public service. That’s why the Sports Commission’s legislation was ignored so that McKenzie could rort the program. That’s why McKenzie’s office devoted itself to allocating the bulk of the grants to less-deserving marginal seat projects. And that’s why the Auditor-General had to use his powers of compulsion under section 32 of the Auditor-General’s Act 1997 to force McKenzie’s staff to hand over documents and answer questions about how they rorted the program.

There’s also hard evidence that Scott Morrison’s office was up to its collective neck in the rorting despite the Prime Minister’s denials. Given the objective of the rorting, the suggestion that Morrison’s office had no idea about which seats the rort was targeting in the looming election campaign is an affront to anyone with a basic understanding of political campaigning.

But according to Phil Gaetjens, long-time Liberal staffer elevated to head of Prime Minister and Cabinet, none of that is in any way problematic. The only issue is McKenzie’s gun club membership, a “gift” so trivial it would normally not be worth registering as pecuniary interest.

Or, at least, that’s what Scott Morrison says is the gist of Gaetjens’ report.

We don’t have the report, just Morrison’s version of it. The Prime Minister could be verballing his secretary and we’d have no idea. Allegedly, Gaetjens concluded:

While there may be differing views about the fairness of the process, the minister used the discretion she was afforded, accordingly, the secretary concludes, I do not believe there is a basis for you to find that the minister had breached standards in that respect. He goes on to note, that he did not find evidence that this process was unduly influenced by reference to marginal or targeted electorates.

If, as Morrison claims, Gaetjens really wrote this, then his credibility is every bit as shot as that of the ousted rorter.

Remember the principles that underpin the ministerial standards:

Based on any meaningful interpretation of those words, McKenzie breached them over and over and over again — hundreds of times — as the best part of $100 million was shovelled out to dud projects located in targeted seats at the expense of far more deserving projects.

If what Morrison says is true, it shouldn’t have taken Gaetjens more than five minutes to reach that conclusion. Instead he took days to do otherwise, presumably while his staff combed through the minutiae of gun club membership forms. The Auditor-General got it spectacularly wrong, according to Gaetjens.

So who are you going to believe? The statutory independent auditor charged with overseeing the administration of public funds, or a veteran Liberal apparatchik?

These are now the officially endorsed standards of the Morrison government: you can blatantly rort a program, defying the legislation of the body involved, bullying it into breaching its own program guidelines and evading your own standards for the administration of grants, and there is no basis to find that a minister will have breached standards. The head of the public service says so.

McKenzie has gone. The stench of partisan self-interest, corrupt maladministration and contempt for taxpayers remains as strong as ever. And it emanates from the very top of this government.

See how power works in this country.

Independence, to us, means everyone’s right to tell the truth beyond just ourselves. If you value independent journalism now is the time to join us. Save $100 when you join us now.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief
SAVE 50%