Our journalism usually sits behind a paywall, but we believe this is the time to make more of our content freely available to as many readers as possible. For more free coverage, sign up to COVID-19 Watch.
Scott Morrison ministry
(Image: AAP/Rohan Thomson)

This week Scott Morrison responded to Greta Thunberg’s UN speech by wistfully opining that we should let “kids be kids”. It was unclear from his statement what kind of kids he wants kids to be — presumably not the kind who inspire hundreds of thousands of people to take to the streets.

The PM said he wants children growing up in Australia to feel positive about their future, and spruiked the way he speaks to his own daughters about climate change. “We don’t have deep conversations about emissions reduction targets and what’s happening with the Kyoto protocol and Paris”, he said, “but we talk about fossil fuels and we talk about what they learn at school, and I encourage them to have a passionate independent view about how they see the world, but I also give them a lot of context”.

“We’ve got to let kids be kids. We can’t have them growing up as mushrooms, but we’ve got to get a bit of context into this.”

Morrison did not explain how he, or other parents and caregivers, should provide that context for children and young people. So Crikey asked Professor Louise Newman AM, a child psychiatrist from the University of Melbourne, for her thoughts on the PM’s statement.

“Children and adolescents are currently expressing concerns about climate and the impact on their future,” she said.

“They are following the issues and raising issues about the government not taking their generation’s anxieties into account and essentially dismissing them with the implication they are being set up or manipulated by adults for particular political purposes. This is largely inaccurate and we know historically that the voice of youth has driven discussion about social issues and change.”

When asked if Morrison’s “let kids be kids” exhortation was particularly useful from a clinical point of view, Newman didn’t think so.

“A few young people will experience high levels of distress — dealing with this includes supporting them in constructive action and debate. Being dismissive can make this worse.

“The PM is implying that children do not have independent capacity for opinions and dismissing their concerns. He is adopting a patronising and unhelpful approach rather than seeking dialogue.

“As a child psychiatrist I am aware of quite young children from age five or six who are aware of fire, drought and related issues. They are potentially impacted by this and politicians need to reflect on the social consequences of a generation who lose faith in the capacity of government to act and protect.”

Newman went on to say that statements about Thunberg’s mental health by others, including Australian psychologist Michael Carr-Gregg, were problematic as well.

“…[I]n my opinion it is irresponsible for psychologists or psychiatrists to make a diagnosis of persons they have not assessed.”

At the time of publishing, it remains unclear if Morrison holds similar concerns for Sir David Attenborough’s climate anxiety. Perhaps we should let nonagenarians just be nonagenarians, too.

Peter Fray

This crisis will cut hard and deep but one day it will be over.

What will be left? What do you want to be left?

I know what I want to see: I want to see a thriving, independent and robust Australian-owned news media. I want to see governments, authorities and those with power held to account. I want to see the media held to account too.

Demand for what we do is running high. Thank you. You can help us even more by encouraging others to subscribe — or by subscribing yourself if you haven’t already done so.

If you like what we do, please subscribe.

Peter Fray
Editor-In-Chief of Crikey

Support us today