It’s been a busy few days for stories about the Aboriginal flag — a familiar and beloved icon.
Several media outlets reported on Tuesday that Aboriginal businesses are fighting for the right to use the Indigenous flag on their products, after being served “cease and desist” letters from a Queensland clothing company that owns the copyright.
But the Aboriginal flag isn’t the only thing that’s allegedly been stolen. Mainstream media journalists have been accused of taking the story of the case without crediting the initial investigation from Indigenous paper Koori Mail.
Exclusives on exclusives
On Wednesday June 5, Koori Mail ran an investigation written by reporter Darren Coyne. It revealed that even though the Aboriginal flag was recognised as a flag of national significance by the Australian government in 1995, Queensland company WAM Clothing owns the flag’s copyright.
Coyne’s investigation also showed that the founder of WAM Clothing was the managing director of Birubi Art Pty Ltd. Birubi was found guilty last year of misrepresenting its art products as hand painted by Australian Aboriginal artists, when they were actually made in Indonesia.
Almost a full week later, on June 11, The Australian ran what they claimed was an “exclusive” story about an Aboriginal clothing company, Spark Health. Remy Varga reported that Spark Health was threatened by US-based retailer Gap over use of the word “gap” including the phrase “closing the gap”. Spark Health was also one of the companies to receive a copyright infringement notice from WAM clothing over its inclusion of the Aboriginal flag on its designs.
While The Australian was the first to report on the Gap element of the story, it failed to give any credit to Koori Mail in discussing WAM’s actions.
A statement from the ABC said “the ABC’s reporting of this story did not originate with or take any content from Koori Mail”.
Cultural appropriation on cultural appropriation
Long-time journalist Paul Cleary was the first to point out the lack of attribution on Twitter, saying it was “perhaps an oversight, or cultural appropriation”. He has previously contributed to The Australian. His concerns were echoed by others on Twitter.
Coyne, who himself is not Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, told Crikey it was ironic that The Australian stole a story about Indigenous ownership theft from an Indigenous newspaper.
“I don’t even read The Australian, and I didn’t want to pay 50 cents to even go online and have a look at it. But if they feel the need to steal the story of a small Indigenous paper with all the resources at their disposal, good luck to them. They don’t want to be seen as relying on a small paper like us to get their news leads,” he said.
Coyne acknowledged that The Australian had an angle that he didn’t cover about the copyrighted word “gap”, but said that they didn’t credit the time that went into researching each paragraph of his original investigation.
“I spent a lot of time researching the history of the flag and read the whole court case around the issue of copyright. I spoke to a number of businesses being affected.”
As for Varga, the author of The Australian’s article, Coyne said that “if that’s the way she works — well, we are always looking for cadets — maybe she can jump on board and we can teach her the right way”.
Varga declined to comment on the matter. Crikey couldn’t reach Melbourne editor of The Australian, David King, at time of publishing.