(Image: AAP/Tracey Nearmy)

Crikey readers were asked yesterday the question of who, if anyone, thought Newstart payments — which haven’t been raised in 25 years — were adequate. Their replies were unsurprising (and incredibly demoralising). Elsewhere, readers hacked into the ongoing saga of Australia’s high-speed rail ambitions.

On Newstart stagnation

Flavia Pagano writes: I am 64 and had to go on welfare. I have never felt so small and insignificant. The $300 per week does not even begin to pay my bills. There are some weeks that I literally starve so I can afford to pay bills. I have applied for jobs but because of my age I don’t even get to a face to face interview. After working all my life I find Newstart very demeaning and cruel. 

Steven Westbrook writes: It seems to me that the whole Newstart system is an anachronism and has become a cost saving measure for government as people are thrown off higher-paying types of assistance. The original unemployment benefit suited times of shorter unemployment and a different housing situation. Rents are much higher than they used to be, public housing is scarcer and employment is more precarious. On cost-saving, an example is the raising of the pension age. This reduces costs to the treasury, but has created a pool of poverty as many older job-seekers find it hard to get an interview, let alone a job. Successive governments have shown a distinct lack of aggression in forcing a change in attitude by employers, leaving these people in an economic jail of extreme poverty.

Peter Vink writes: I tried to live on Newstart for four months in 2017. I was in no way able to pay for fuel in my car to get to interviews, or pay for electricity. I had to get food handouts and was considering living in my car and not paying rent to make ends meet. I was fortunate to get a job, and it took me several months to get back on my feet. Newstart is a joke and I really do not know how anyone can live on it, yet alone pay rent as well.

Peter Schulz writes: The Coalition can’t afford to increase Newstart by the $75 per week recommended by all and sundry, but they’re quite happy to spend a reported $10,000 to $14,000 per annum per person on the basics card. And then they claim the mantle of superior economic managers!

On Australia’s rail ambitions

R. Ambrose Raven writes: According to rail transport professor John Preston from the University of Southampton, very few city pairs in the world can satisfy the necessary conditions for commercially viable high-speed rail network. But these fast-rail projects appear to be much more about extending the economic range of property development — being able to travel quickly to regional areas means housing there will suddenly leap in price. Naturally it is driven by a board full of ex-politicians on high pay using their connections. Where is the Infrastructure Australia assessment? There isn’t one.

Send your comments, corrections, clarifications and cock-ups to [email protected]. We reserve the right to edit comments for length and clarity. Please include your full name if you would like to be considered for publication.

Peter Fray

Help us keep up the fight

Get Crikey for just $1 a week and support our journalists’ important work of uncovering the hypocrisies that infest our corridors of power.

If you haven’t joined us yet, subscribe today and get your first 12 weeks for $12.

Cancel anytime.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW