Modi

Next week voting starts in India’s national elections. But it’s a vote where a historically robust free journalism is increasingly constrained by the ruling party — as a government, as an advertiser and as an ideological voice.

As journalist Raksha Kumar wrote in the recent PEN International report: “speech is free in India as long as it conforms to a majoritarian perspective furthered by the establishment.”

This “majoritarian perspective” is cautious code for the populist Hindu nationalist (“Hindutva”) approach of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. It’s a practical manifestation of what Jan-Werner Müller described in What is Populism? as “a moralised form of antipluralism” where “only some of the people are really the people”.

For many Indians — particularly journalists and writers — it’s a shocking shift from traditional secular pluralism, respecting minorities, including that 10% of the world’s Muslims who live in the country. For Australians, it’s a warning of how quickly a free media can be undermined.

As with Trump’s trope, journalists who criticise the people’s government must, by definition, be the “enemy of the people”. Unleashing the people against these enemies has already proved fatal. According to the Indian journalists group Free Speech Collective:

In 2018, seven journalists were killed in relation to their work, at least 27 incidents of attacks on 33 journalists took place, there were arrests of at least 10 journalists and the detention of six others (including three foreign journalists), at least 17 instances of threats and harassment and 114 instances of censorship of news, film, academia, cultural events and public meetings.

Driving that ideological shift has been a multi-faceted political exercise, involving using the state, the party and the Hindutva movement. Apart from the violence and harassment, its tactics range from disciplining journalists for being anti-national, directing government advertising to supportive media, the buy-out of regional (and usually non-English) media by government supporters and self-censorship by mainstream media.

At the national level, Prime Minister Narendra Modi uses social media as his major communication tool. Unlike Trump, the Modi stream is relatively disciplined, backed up by an inner circle (who can be more intemperate) and then amplified with increasing virulence by supporters.

Since his 2014 election, Modi has never held a press conference. Journalist requests for comment are almost always referred by the government’s press officers to statements made on Facebook or Twitter.

A Reuters industry report last month demonstrated the extent to which Indian news has become a mobile and platform-based world. In a survey for the report, 68% of English speakers identified smartphones as the major device for accessing news. An overwhelming majority identified the tech platforms as their major news source. Only 18% considered news sites as their primary source of news.

Outside the control of platform content moderators, the messaging platform WhatsApp has been used to share inflammatory messages from group to group. According to the Reuters report, 52% of respondents cite WhatsApp as their major news source. As a result, WhatsApp has introduced limits on sharing and methods to monitor hate speech in that closed (and end-to-end encrypted) platform.

Some traditional media, such as The Hindu, has stood against the tide — and the gap being left by traditional media is being filled in part by online (and largely English language) news media such as The Wire, Scroll and media critic News Laundry. But despite their journalistic quality, they have limited reach.

This election year, the temperature has gone up as much of the Indian media has welcomed militarism into the nationalist discourse, following the car-bombing of a militarised police convoy near Pulwama in Kashmir in February, killing about 40. Blaming the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed, India bombed a camp inside Pakistan.

Since then, the government has followed up with the successful test of a ground to space missile last week.

The media — particularly cable media — responded with the rhetoric and symbolism of war, including anchors appearing on screen in military fatigues, and carrying (admittedly, toy) weapons. Australians watching the recent third one-day international Australia-India match would have seen this militarism in play in popular culture as the Indian team wore army caps on the field.

Voting in the Indian election will run from April 11 to May 19. Votes will be counted and declared on May 23.

Peter Fray

Help us keep up the fight

Get Crikey for just $1 a week and support our journalists’ important work of uncovering the hypocrisies that infest our corridors of power.

If you haven’t joined us yet, subscribe today and get your first 12 weeks for $12.

Cancel anytime.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW