Our journalism usually sits behind a paywall, but we believe this is the time to make more of our content freely available to as many readers as possible. For more free coverage, sign up to COVID-19 Watch.
climate change news corp
News Corp columnist Andrew Bolt.

News Corp is the home for climate denial in Australian media. With sceptics Andrew Bolt, Miranda Devine, Terry McCrann and Tim Blair as columnists, and Graham Lloyd as The Australian’s environment editor, the parent company of Australia’s most-read and influential newspapers provides a regular megaphone to denialist theories.

In the past year alone, The Australian (News Corp’s national broadsheet) has run stories by its environment editor Graham Lloyd that have:

Of all News Corp’s Australian titles, it’s The Australian’s science news coverage that’s most often picked up for pushing climate denialism. Instead of giving most weight to the scientific consensus, it gives credence to scientific outliers, as with Lloyd’s Great Barrier Reef story.

Lloyd’s reporting is a regular fixture on the ABC’s Media Watch, as well as the focus of other media observers (including Crikey). But The Australian and its tabloid stablemates also use their opinion pages to ridicule scientists and media outlets or journalists that report on climate change.

The Herald Sun’s Andrew Bolt refers to those who believe the accepted climate science as “warmists”, while his Daily Telegraph colleague Miranda Devine blames bushfires (including 2009 the Black Saturday bushfires) on “green ideology” and rejects any connection between climate change and extreme weather events.

Bolt and Devine both have regular broadcast commitments on News Corp’s Sky News.

The local newspapers’ denialism follows a global pattern for News Corp products — a 2012 analysis found that climate coverage by Fox News and The Wall Street Journal were “overwhelmingly misleading”.

Researchers from the University of Melbourne studied opinion pieces and letters to the editor published in the local News Corp and (what was then) Fairfax newspapers between 2009 and 2013, and found that the “science accuracy” was much worse in the News Corp papers. Professor David Karoly worked on that research when he was at the University of Melbourne, but is now at the CSIRO’s earth systems and climate change hub (part of the national environmental science program). He told Crikey that they found a greater bias in both opinion pieces and letters to the editor in News Corp papers, and especially in The Australian.

“The opinion pieces in The Australian newspaper, which are often not submitted but sought, ended up being significantly more biased than the letters to the editor, and this is still the case,” he said. “It’s clear that the News Corp newspapers are trying to influence an audience, but particularly when it’s in commissioned opinion pieces.”

The research also found that The Australian was more biased than its tabloid stablemates, the Herald Sun and The Daily Telegraph.

“They try to strengthen a view around climate change not being an issue, or the major costs perceived to occur with moving away from coal-fired power stations and to renewable energy,” he said. “They’re essentially spruiking a Rupert Murdoch view that they do want to undercut or destroy the credibility of the science that’s been accepted in international assessments around the world and the IPCC assessment but it doesn’t fit their owner’s ideology.”

While there have been recent complaints to the Australian Press Council about News Corp’s climate change coverage, a spokesperson said none have gone as far as adjudication. A complaint about a 2012 Bolt column that inaccurately described some of the global warming science was partly upheld, but complaints about Tim Blair in 2011 and Piers Akerman in 2012 were not upheld. The most recent complaints about climate change to go to adjudication were in 2014, the year that the council upheld complaints about The Australian’s 2013 reporting on that year’s IPCC report.

This piece is part of our dedicated climate change series, Slow Burn. Read the rest here.

Peter Fray

This crisis will cut hard and deep but one day it will be over.

What will be left? What do you want to be left?

I know what I want to see: I want to see a thriving, independent and robust Australian-owned news media. I want to see governments, authorities and those with power held to account. I want to see the media held to account too.

Demand for what we do is running high. Thank you. You can help us even more by encouraging others to subscribe — or by subscribing yourself if you haven’t already done so.

If you like what we do, please subscribe.

Peter Fray
Editor-In-Chief of Crikey

Support us today