Our journalism usually sits behind a paywall, but we believe this is the time to make more of our content freely available to as many readers as possible. For more free coverage, sign up to COVID-19 Watch.
Julie Bishop

From the Crikey grapevine, it’s the latest tips and rumours …

The Wintour of our discontent. Former foreign minister Julie Bishop doesn’t make the front page of The Australian nearly as often as she used to since the regime change shoved her to the outer of government. But today, she returned for her support of Vogue editor-in-chief Anna Wintour, who said Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s “record on LGBTQ rights … seems backward in all ­senses”.

You could, of course, set your watch by the reaction — Chris Kenny and Miranda Devine both wrote pieces that quite magnificently typified their tendency to hysteria.

While there has been much speculation, Bishop is not yet officially among those to jump from Morrison’s sinking ship, but her tune is certainly changing. After years of equivocating, in 2015 she gave quiet indication that she supported marriage equality saying “I have absolutely no concerns about it myself, but I know there a lot of people who are deeply concerned about the issue”. And then she returned to silence, refusing to campaign for marriage equality during the debate proper, or even join Liberals and Nationals for Yes.

It was noted that she was even less active than prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who at the very least made his feelings clear. “She has been completely absent,” one campaigner put it at the time. Several pieces noted Bishop’s tendency to “go with the flow” on this issue, and according to The Daily Tele Bishop’s silence led “colleagues to speculate she is trying to keep conservative colleagues and voters on-side in case there is a ­future leadership spill”.  

So what should we make of her describing Wintour’s point of view as “pertinent”. Is it a sign that she no longer worries about the Devines and Kennys (and, while we’re on the subject, the Abbotts) of the world? And if so, what does that say about the famously cautious Bishop’s future?

The Daily Mail will have its revenge. There was a fair bit of schadenfreude in the air yesterday when it was reported that a fake news plug-in, pre-installed on Microsoft’s internet browsers, marked the Daily Mail as a website that generally fails “maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability”. The Mail has already responded strongly, calling the classification “egregiously erroneous”. The UK newspaper and global website is trying to get the label reversed, but Ms Tips will be watching with interest if they don’t succeed.

When Wikipedia removed the Daily Mail as a trusted source in 2017, it went into full attack mode, running stories with headlines including: “The making of a Wiki-lie“, “It’s time to discipline the lawless internet” and “My son’s imaginary affair with Myleene Klass and why I know Wikipedia publishes any old nonsense“. A few months later, the Mail went after Wikipedia again for hosting links to Islamic State propaganda.

If Microsoft sticks with the plug-in, and the Daily Mail keeps its current status, Ms Tips will be looking out for “investigations” into the company’s business practices, as well as into The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the philanthropic organisation run by co-founder Bill Gates and his wife. We suspect the couple should probably keep an eye out for paparazzi, too.

Where is the China lobby? We know it’s still summer holidays for some, but the normally verbose China lobby seems awfully quiet on China’s arbitrary detention of Australian citizen Yang Hengjun.

Where’s Bob Carr, normally ready to offer a chin-stroking op-ed about the importance of cosying up to China? Where’s Hugh White, enthusiast for appeasement of Beijing? Or NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane, he of the call for China to create a new world order? Are they keeping their heads low during yet another demonstration of Beijing’s contempt for basic human rights?

Then again, Chinese agents have been kidnapping dissidents and alleged “criminals” from Australia and other western countries for years without raising a complaint from the China lobbyists, so surely another detention is neither here nor there?

White (supremacist) ball cricket. More proof, as if any were needed, that the mainstreaming of white supremacist talking points is not without consequence: a banner reading “It’s ok to be white” was unfurled at yesterday’s Big Bash League match between the Perth Scorchers and Sydney Thunder. It’s a phrase that would be familiar to anyone in the Australian Senate who endorsed and then hastily disendorsed it when it was put forward as a motion by Pauline Hanson late last year.

The men involved were issued a move on notice by police, and ejected from the ground. Ms Tips asked a few of Australia’s preeminent fascist-watchers who they thought might be responsible, and all pointed to leaders of the United Patriots Front in WA — who have previously been involved in scuffles with protesters at Safe Schools rallies, and Muslim students at the Murdoch University Muslim prayer centre, and Curtin University

Heard anything that might interest Crikey? Send your tips to [email protected], use our guaranteed anonymous form or other ways to leak to us securely.

Peter Fray

This crisis will cut hard and deep but one day it will be over.

What will be left? What do you want to be left?

I know what I want to see: I want to see a thriving, independent and robust Australian-owned news media. I want to see governments, authorities and those with power held to account. I want to see the media held to account too.

Demand for what we do is running high. Thank you. You can help us even more by encouraging others to subscribe — or by subscribing yourself if you haven’t already done so.

If you like what we do, please subscribe.

Peter Fray
Editor-In-Chief of Crikey

Support us today