mitch fifield ABC

With last week’s spectacular departure of Justin Milne and Michelle Guthrie, the previously unknown ABC board is now the all-but exclusive creation of one man — the Institute of Public Affairs-aligned Senator Mitch Fifield.

The entire board has turned over since he became minister in 2015, giving his appointees the numbers on the board until after the 2022 federal election.

His appointees have been largely hand-picked from that professional cadre of business executives, by-passing the merit-based appointment panel process set up by the former Labor government. With the removal of the Turnbull friend Justin Milne, it’s Fifield’s board.

The board has ended up with more authority and power in the ABC wars than ever before — and at the worst possible time for the organisation.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial and get Crikey straight to your inbox

By submitting this form you are agreeing to Crikey's Terms and Conditions.

This board of ministerial mates, most with no knowledge of the media will be guiding the ABC through the minefield laid by this minister: the budget cuts, the Tonagh “efficiency” review, the government’s “competitive neutrality” review and, now, the departmental review into political interference.

Applying the “watch what they do, not what they say” rule, these “reviews” are about shaping a minimalist vision for the ABC — one that sees it privatised in part or by function, at best reduced to serving the gaps left by commercial media market failure.

Contrary to this view has been the embrace of digital disruption by successive to position the ABC as the media player that guarantees an enduring Australian voice, championed by MDs Scott and Guthrie and successive chairs Spigelman and Milne.

The falling out between Guthrie and Milne, was not about where the ABC should be, but about how it should get there. Milne had a grand technological vision — Project Jetstream, sort of a super Netflix, funded by a generous one-off grant.

Guthrie had a people-centred vision, seeking to rebuild the ABC as an “agile” organisation, Silicon Valley-style, to make it lean and human-facing, an organisation that could adapt and pivot on the run. Practically, this meant implementing a substantial corporate restructure and management flattening and leaving program makers to make programs.

The problem with Milne’s strategy is that it depended on Canberra writing the cheque. His plan was to win that cheque by pandering to the Canberra 24-7 complaints machine. His error was to express it in careless emails after “two glasses of red” and phone calls as sacking and shooting prominent journalists.

The problem with Guthrie’s plan was that it crashed into a third vision: ABC staff who hold themselves as the torch bearers of the ABC traditions. In the face of those traditions, she spoke Google, not ABC. In Google’s Silicon Valley, there are no dumb questions — asking dumb questions teases out different thinking. It’s considered a virtue.

In the ABC, they were simply considered dumb.

She compounded that by replacing Scott’s deft touch with the hero-gram with the Larry cards. Turns out the wrong way to say “thanks” can cost you your job.

An unlikely advocate for industrial democracy, Milne was able to claim that her dismissal was essential because she’d lost the support of ABC staff. A handful of senior staff were a touch too preening in taking credit. In truth — as his emails later showed — the Milne claim had as much credibility as Trump’s assertion that he sacked James Comey because of the FBI’s treatment of Hillary Clinton.

Acting MD David Anderson has pitched himself as the candidate of stability, of the ABC traditions. It’s the positioning of the last acting MD (and last internal appointee) who stepped up to the permanent job — Russell Balding who replaced the un-lamented Johnathon Shier.

Anderson will be dishing up a reheated Guthrie strategy, made a touch more digestible for staff.

Despite the calls for the board to go, they’ll likely endure — and would only be replaced by another round of look-alike Fifield appointments, with another round of five year terms.

The attempted political interventions won’t go away. Fifield’s regular letters of complaint will continue to be processed through the exhausting complaints process, replacing Turnbull’s “will no-one rid me of this meddlesome priest?” style phone calls.

And the Fifield board will be managing the answers to the questions that the Fifield reviews will be asking them.