A taxpayer-funded scheme to enable farmers to set aside funding for drought years has hit record highs despite the drought and taxpayers pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into propping up farms.
The Farm Management Deposit Scheme was established by the Howard government in 1999. It allowed farmers to effectively shift revenue from good years to bad years by placing pre-tax income into an FMD account, deferring any tax liability into years with lower revenue. That means farmers pay less tax even when they have a bumper crop or prices are high. The purpose of the scheme, however, was to encourage farmers to put aside income for drought years. It’s the kind of drought resilience policy that bodies like the Productivity Commission have long called for: encourage farmers to prepare for inevitable drought years rather than receiving handouts from taxpayers, which reward farmers who have failed to responsibly manage their properties.
Deposits into the scheme traditionally have an up-and-down pattern: farmers work out how much money to put into the scheme at the end of each financial year and then draw down on previous years’ funds during the course of the year if necessary because of drought or low prices. As the end of the financial year approaches again and their financial position becomes clear, they start putting more money in.
Initially, the scheme was used like that. When the Millennium Drought hit in the 2000s, farmers dipped into their funds in the scheme. Department of Agriculture data shows that in June 2005, the total level of funds — which normally tends to rise each year — stood at $2.8 billion, but a year later fell to $2.7 billion. It then returned to $2.8 billion in June 2007, rose to $2.9 billion in 2008, but fell again in 2009 to $2.8 billion and fell again in 2010.
Things changed in 2016: the appeal of the scheme as a tax minimisation vehicle increased markedly following changes by the Turnbull government. The cap was doubled to $800,000, the scheme was made more liquid, with farmers able to draw on funds in less than 12 months if there is drought, and banks were allowed to use the funds as offset accounts against other loans. Now taxpayers are foregoing revenue not just so farmers can move their income into lean years, but so they can subsidise loans.
Banks were initially reluctant to offer offsets, but recently the Agriculture Minister David Littleproud gave the banks a serve and — exploiting their willingness to try to use drought relief to improve their battered images — demanded they start providing them. So despite hysteria from the media and politicians about how horrendous the current drought is, this June saw a new all-time record level of deposits: $6.6 billion.
(Click to enlarge)
As the data shows, the government’s changes turbocharged deposits, especially when coupled with superannuation changes that reduced the tax minimisation appeal of super funds. And the allegedly catastrophic drought has had no apparent impact, unlike a decade ago. Indeed, the two states that are notionally the worst-affected by drought, NSW and Queensland, have seen the highest rate of growth in deposits — 60% and 67%, respectively — since 2015. In contrast, during the Millennium Drought, NSW deposits fell three consecutive years between 2007 and 2010, and didn’t recover to 2008 levels in Queensland until 2012.
(Click to enlarge)
The scheme, ostensibly to enable farmers to fund for themselves during drought, is now just a tax minimisation lurk for farmers while taxpayers dole out huge amounts of drought relief.