Australian singer-songwriter Alex Lahey

This is the second instalment in a two-part series. Read part one, Should Netflix be forced to screen more Australian content?“.

Ironically, the rise of streaming and the drop-off in free-to-air viewing is being used by broadcasters as ammunition to do away with local content quotas altogether. The free-to-air broadcaster’s peak lobby group, FreeTV, has urged the government to “move towards new settings that give the industry the right flexibility and incentives to innovate and respond to our audiences.”

Invest in the journalism that makes a difference.

EOFY Sale. A year for just $99.

SAVE 50%

The broadcasters want to do away with children’s content quotas altogether, arguing that Aussie children no longer watch children’s programming on free-to-air. “Very small numbers of children (often less than 10,000) now watch C- and P-classified programs on commercial free-to-air TV,” FreeTV argued.

Industry players and observers think this would be a disaster.  

Moves to slash local production and abandon children’s television quotas represent a “nightmare scenario,” according to Screen Producers Australia’s Matthew Deaner.

“We did some modelling based on the Free TV submission to the [federal government’s screen] content inquiry, and on those figures Seven would have [met] its 2016 drama quota on Home and Away, 800 Words and Molly – just those three productions.”

800 Words is made in New Zealand, and then Molly is only four hours of TV, so Seven would have acquitted its Australian content obligation with four hours of independent drama for the whole year.”  

Southern Cross University screen industries researcher Anna Potter points out that when British authorities did this in the early 2000s, investment in children’s television in the UK fell off a cliff. “In the UK, content quotas were removed on commercial public service broadcasters ITV, Five and Channel 4 in 2003; between 2003 and 2014 investment in children’s television by these broadcasters fell 95%, from £59m to £3m,” she wrote in a submission to Fifield’s inquiry.  

Meanwhile in the Australian music industry…

Not everyone is worried about streaming content, however. Unlike the screen producers, the Australian music industry is starting to enjoy strong revenue growth — courtesy of Spotify.  

After years of trickle, the music streaming dollars are starting to flow. Music royalties body APRA-AMCOS last year reported a 62% increase in streaming revenue, most of it from Spotify, YouTube and Apple. That’s starting to make a real difference to musicians with serious online presences.

“We see enormous growth in subscriber numbers, and therefore revenues to our members,” APRA-AMCOS’ David Sheils told Crikey in a phone interview. The collection agency claims there are more than four million paid subscribers to music streaming services in Australia alone, many of them on Spotify.

With all those royalties flowing in from the streaming services, it’s not surprising APRA is optimistic about the future of streaming. Spotify has just landed its stock exchange listing, releasing a trove of data earlier this year that trumpeted its dominance of the streaming music sector.   

So just how much Australian music is on Spotify?

“That’s an interesting question,” Sheils admits. “It fluctuates from month to month, and quarter to quarter, but you could reasonably say it sits around 20% for music streaming services, which is pretty good.”

“I guess to our mind it suggests that, not only is Australian content important from a cultural point of view, there’s a business case for it, too.”

But what about an Australian quota? At this stage, APRA-AMCOS won’t commit. Sheils says the music body is “engaging” with Spotify and the other streaming services, about getting more Australian content onto their services.

“We think there’s an opportunity … what we’d like to see is a more prominent use of Australian content in the curated playlists, featured heavily and presented to users when they open the service.”

So, how would Spotify do it? In the end, it comes down to the platform itself. Spotify is a hybrid system. Users find music by searching, but also because Spotify plays certain songs for them. And that’s all down to the algorithm, which is a black box based on data from users.

And that’s the problem with all of these services. RMIT’s Lobato points out that “algorithmic curation is a new frontier for public policy.” In the media industries, power often vests to those who hold the distribution pipelines. And in music, as in screen, those distributors are increasingly foreign-owned platforms.

As SPA’s Deaner points out, there is strong electoral support for Australian culture. “People care about this,” he insists. “They don’t want their kids growing up with American accents.”

Save this EOFY while you make a difference

Australia has spoken. We want more from the people in power and deserve a media that keeps them on their toes. And thank you, because it’s been made abundantly clear that at Crikey we’re on the right track.

We’ve pushed our journalism as far as we could go. And that’s only been possible with reader support. Thank you. And if you haven’t yet subscribed, this is your time to join tens of thousands of Crikey members to take the plunge.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
SAVE 50%