“Competitive neutrality” is a fantastically meaningless phrase

Crikey readers on Chris Lilley and competitive neutrality.

On the ABC and SBS inquiry

Shrdlu writes: Re. “ Inquiry into ABC and SBS on the launch pad, but who’s the target?“(Friday)

I tried, I tried to get my mind around the two words “competitive neutrality”. I think the left hemisphere was just two competitive for the right as the left led with a left hook and the hook was in the first sentence. Wow what a punchline. To be neutral is to be neutral and uncompetitive, I asked myself, just what is “competitive neutrality” as one of the words surely must give up and be a fatality.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

2 thoughts on ““Competitive neutrality” is a fantastically meaningless phrase

  1. Woopwoop

    “The Shark didn’t spare Australia from Trump’s tarrifs:”
    Doesn’t Crikey have a spell-checker?

    1. AR

      Unlikely, but it would still require a sub editor to intervene.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details