Sam Dastyari

As we welcome the Lunar New Year, the question of Australia’s relationship with its largest trading and export partner is whether 2018 will be the same kind of dog of a year as 2017 was.

Last year was arguably the most difficult between the Australia and China since Kevin Rudd’s 2009 annus horribilis lead by the Defence white paper that named China as a threat and the Rio Tinto bribery scandal topped off the iron ore wars.

In 2017, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade decided, in its own diplomatic way, to take ever quiet aim at China in the first Foreign Affairs white paper since 2003, piping up about China’s Great Wall of Sand, its artificial islands in the South China Sea. This, China continues to assert, is none of Australia’s business — never mind that the vast bulk of our trade is shipped through it, but more on on that shortly.

But it’s on the home front where things really took a beating as the scales began falling from the eyes of Australia about the influence being wielded by China’s ruling Communist Party via its United Front Work Department (UFWD), the beginnings of what is now being called “sharp power” from China. ALP Senator Sam Dastyari lost his job over his hamfisted kowtowing to his Chinese funders. It even reached publishing, when Allen and Unwin cancelled the printing of Clive Hamilton’s book on the UFWD, Silent Invasion: How China is Turning Australia into a Puppet State.

The dog of a year reached its zenith in December when the Turnbull, a man more familiar with China that most Australian politicians, introduced new laws on political campaign financing that appears very much to target Chinese money. Yet it is Chinese investment, and investment from other part of the vast and complex string of nations we lump together as Asia, that is breathing life into Australia’s farmlands. 

At the centre of the Australia-China relationship remains trade and investment and that relationship continues to go from strength to strength. In 2016 Australia’s imports from China were $62 billion and exports to China were $93 billion  — in total well more than twice our No. 2 trade partner, the US ($64 billion in two way trade). Put simply, China needs us more than we need them from a trade point of view.

Yet for all the cornucopia of wealth that China has spewed forth into Australia, so far the portents are already not looking particularly good in terms having a cohesive, systematic and measured approach to China in 2018. China will flex its military might and growing regional influence in Southeast Asia. The US has not helped by appointing Admiral Harry Harris as Ambassador to Australia — a move that will have gone down in Beijing like a cup of cold sick.

There is a conga line of informed and sensible commentators who have bemoaned Australia’s schizophrenic approach to the Middle Kingdom. Instead of governments and the business community investing serious time and effort developing relationships in China that will help Australia, longer term, our politicians instead seem insistent, instead on simply barking at the moon.

新年快乐! Happy New Year!

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW