Menu lock

Politics

Dec 7, 2017

If I were the banks, I wouldn’t be losing sleep over the royal commission

Even an aggressive commissioner who manages to work around the commission's impotent framing probably won't reveal anything we don't already know.

Michael Bradley — Managing partner at Marque Lawyers

Michael Bradley

Managing partner at Marque Lawyers

The Prime Minister having finally conceded the inevitable, 99% of the excitement about the banking royal commission is now over. Makes you wonder why he spent so much political capital on a cause that was not just a no-win for his government, but also easy in the end to stage-manage into disinterest.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

4 comments

Leave a comment

4 thoughts on “If I were the banks, I wouldn’t be losing sleep over the royal commission

  1. klewso

    It smacks of Howard’s corseted “republican referendum”? “Stitch it up to get the result you want”.
    A Clayton’s Inquiry with the consolation (for the banks deigning) prize :- the key to the industry super hen house?

  2. zut alors

    The Opposition should’ve ceased braying for a Royal Commission into banking & left it as a popular electioneering promise (which Turnbull/whoever would never have matched).

    By pushing the matter we now have Turnbull & Co setting the terms of reference, the very situation which should’ve been avoided.

  3. scaught1928@armyspy.com

    It is likely the RC will still be going when there is a Labor government. If so, all bets are off.

  4. AR

    Agree that this will be a waste of time & money but, as Zut pointed out, also a massive political failure by gumBoil Shlernt – he could have been formulating an election winning strategy using the banks.
    Many people would be dumb & deluded enough to believe that he would actually do something worthwhile, should he be able to maintain his body temperature and not fall out of his chair before the election delivers him with his Right faction baggage on the doorsteps of the Lodge.