Tips and rumours

Oct 25, 2017

Tips and rumours

Registered Organisation Commission to immediately face the music ... calling time on Malcolm Roberts ... a new low for Ian Macdonald ...

From the Crikey grapevine, the latest tips and rumours …

Macdonald hits new low. While this week's Legal and Constitutional Affairs estimates hearing didn't feature the debacle of May, when the senate's worst committee chair, Ian Macdonald, tried to silence a Greens senator and -- after a very heated private meeting in which Eric Abetz and Penny Wong had to play peacemakers -- learnt he didn't have the power, Macdonald found a different low point. Yesterday, Macdonald asked the Australian Federal Police about the incident last December when a man tried to blow himself up near the offices of the Australian Christian Lobby in Canberra. Now, to be fair, we think the ACL's stoush with the AFP about this isn't entirely unreasonable. The man concerned, who recently took his own life, was clearly motivated by the desire to self-harm, but also expressed hatred for the ACL. However, the AFP rejected that as a motivation for his actions. The ACL is quite right to query the AFP's stance on this. But Macdonald, who admitted he was asking questions at the behest of the ACL, wanted to go further with the issue, and then was followed by Eric Abetz, who proceeded to ask detailed questions about the man concerned and his actions. Wong and Labor colleague Louise Pratt both raised concerns about the sensitivity of publicly discussing suicide details. But Macdonald was having none of it, and explicitly said that an estimates hearing shouldn't be worried about such issues.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

3 comments

Leave a comment

3 thoughts on “Tips and rumours

  1. old greybearded one

    I will express my extreme dislike of the ACL and the CfM on the basis that they are absolute unmitigated liars. The claptrap bout children and compulsory this and that. They turned me from a not too fussed person into a strong yes proponent. How are they allowed to do this? Some of the stuff is completely untrue (ie the events did not happen)

  2. Wayne Cusick

    So why has ittaken over a week for the High Court to reach their conclusion?

    1. Harry.v.Dirchy

      I’d suggest to coincide with the rise of parliament & avoid the prospect of a no confidence vote on the government.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...