Menu lock


Oct 12, 2017

Hack of defence firm reveals a cybersecurity framework in chaos

While endlessly talking about the importance of cybersecurity, the government has an all-care-no-responsibility attitude toward its defence data.

Bernard Keane — Politics Editor

Bernard Keane

Politics Editor

The revelation that an Australian defence subcontractor had a large volume of material on Australia’s defence assets stolen in an “extensive and extreme compromise” should ring loud alarm bells in Canberra. Instead, it will likely pass with little interest. But be sure our enemies and allies have noted it.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

18 thoughts on “Hack of defence firm reveals a cybersecurity framework in chaos

  1. Barry Reynolds

    One possible solution is to stop the out sourcing, employ people and bring everything back under direct government control and make the ASD responsible for IT security


    Yes, both apply. We are at the end of the game. We are sitting in the seat called absurdity and are lost in cyberspace….just where we are supposed to be. Just like the space family Robinson they (their Government) ain’t looking to rescue them anytime soon. And so we seek solutions! For what!
    As long as our so called security is written on software you can forget any security at all because it doesn’t work that way. You need to hit the digital boolean on the motherboard with the correct devices in order to maintain proper “security”. Thats all folks. But then your tech device will have this huge security device attached to it bigger than your tech device to achieve an acceptable protocol. No only at the simplest level can you be protected, anything destined for the software side of tech usage is open slather. People will learn one day!

  3. Pollietragic

    Isn’t it ridiculous that Pyne claims no responsibility for outsourced sensitive defence intelligence being hacked?

    Remember when the LNP blamed Garret for insulation installer contractor deaths?
    You can’t have it both ways, Pyne.