Menu lock

The World

Apr 20, 2017

Jakarta elections mark Indonesia’s increasingly conservative turn

The campaign against "Ahok" based on sectarian arguments shows that Indonesia is moving in a more conservative Muslim direction.

Professor Damien Kingsbury

Crikey international affairs commentator

Basuki ‘Ahok’ Tjahaja Purnama

The overwhelming defeat of Basuki Tjahaja Purnama as Jakarta’s governor has marked the most divisive and religiously focused major election in Indonesia’s post-Suharto period. The election was marked by sectarian protests and has resulted in a strong win by former education and culture minister Anies Baswedan.

Purnama — better known as “Ahok” — a Christian of ethnic Chinese descent, inherited Jakarta’s governorship when former governor Jokowi Widodo (also known as “Jokowi”) stepped down to run for Indonesia’s presidency. Although he had been an efficient city governor, the anti-Ahok campaign against him was based on him not being Muslim.

This campaign turned particularly nasty last December when Ahok was charged with blasphemy. The charge followed Ahok’s reply to opponents citing the Holy Koran against him, in which he said that voters should not allow themselves to be duped by religious leaders. A version of Ahok’s speech posted online, with some words removed, implied that the Koranic verse Al-Maidah 51 (Muslims should not take Christians or Jews as “allies”) was itself misleading, rather than the people citing it.

Indonesia has a historical anti-Chinese undercurrent with anti-Chinese legislation, though now largely repealed, and anti-Chinese riots as recently as the late 1990s. In March 2016, Indonesian army general Suryo Prabowo said that Ahok should “know his place lest the Indonesian Chinese face the consequences of his action”, hinting at the 1990s anti-Chinese riots.

As well as having a racist and sectarian element, the Jakarta election also marked the larger divide in Indonesian politics. Anies Baswedan is supported by presidential candidate, former hard-line general and president Suharto’s former son-in-law, Prabowo Subianto. Ahok was deputy to Jokowi when he was Jakarta governor.

The conservative “strong man” Prabowo ran a disciplined campaign against the populist Jokowi in Indonesia’s 2014 presidential election. With Ahok facing legal as well as political difficulty, Jokowi abandoned his former political ally. Since his election in 2014, Jokowi has been a weak president and, although having a working relationship with Prabowo to ensure the smooth running of the legislature, remains vulnerable to his future challenge.

Supported by the militant Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), which staged violent protests against Ahok’s governorship, Anies Basweden’s win is likely to herald social changes to Jakarta. It is unlikely that Anies Basweden will be able to impose full Islamic law (shariah), which exists in the province of Aceh and some other municipalities. However, it is likely that some aspects of shariah could be introduced, including restrictions on women traveling alone after dark.

What the election also marks is the growth of a more fundamentalist Islam in Indonesia. Indonesia has been widely known for its tolerant Islam, referring primarily to the nominal “abangan” Muslims of Central and East Java.

Since the 1990s, however, a more observant, less tolerant version of Islam has been growing, in part due to fundamentalist Saudi funding of Indonesian schools and mosques, in part in response to perceptions of a growing Islam-secular West divide and, in part, reflecting the global trend towards populist conservativism.

With Ahok representing an unpopular minority, Anies Basweden’s double digit victory does need to be read with some caution. But there is no doubt that a more radical Islamist agenda will be emboldened by Anies Basweden’s overtly Islamic campaign.

With Indonesia’s wider shift towards a more observant form of Islam and the apparent failure of President Jokowi’s “soft” populism, the Jakarta elections indicate that the way is being paved for Indonesia to return to a more conservative, hard-line political agenda that is increasingly aligned with less tolerant forms of Islam.

* Damien Kingsbury is Professor of International Politics at Deakin University and author of a number of books are articles on Indonesian politics. 

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “Jakarta elections mark Indonesia’s increasingly conservative turn

  1. Jimbo

    We now see how Islam uses the freedoms associated with democracy to shut democracy down. Ban anyone who is not Muslim by forbidding Muslims from voting for them. From that point on they do what they like.

  2. Dion Giles

    Indonesia is our enemy and has always been our enemy. So is the Moslem cult as it has shown yet again in Indonesia. Openness to closedness is a one way open door to closedness which inevitably prevails when we help keep it open. It is fitting that Mr Turnbull is re-stating Australian values much as this seems by upset appeasers, not that Australian values are unique as they derive from the European Enlightenment and are enriched by the values of indigenous Australians.

  3. Raaraa

    The contest in Jakarta had the voters fooled. It may look like Muslims vs Christians, but in the end, it was the political elite backing an establishment ex-minister against a governor who happened to be Christian, taking advantage of a situation taken seriously out of context.

    1. Jimbo

      Were the angry Muslim street rioters getting something out of context when they demanded the Chinese Christian be tried for blasphemy? Muslims cannot vote for a non-Muslim according to the Koran.

      1. Matt Hardin

        There’s an al-Jazeera article linked from the Crikey worm that goes into this as a front for a military coup. Not about Islam but about the generals. FDI is apparently a front for the generals.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.