Menu lock

TV & Radio

Mar 20, 2017

What Q&A tells us about the ABC’s soul

It's Tanya Plibersek's world, we just live in it, writes former Sydney Morning Herald editor-in-chief and UTS Professor of Journalism Peter Fray.

Peer into the soul of ABC and who would you see? Michelle Guthrie? Leigh Sales? Mr Squiggle? No.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

24 comments

Leave a comment

24 thoughts on “What Q&A tells us about the ABC’s soul

  1. rossco

    I would like to see a similar analysis for Insiders, on both panelists and guests. For the guests I would be interested in break down by party, gender and state.

  2. zut alors

    O’Dwyer has appeared only three times? Why does it seem more….

    1. leon knight

      They are long hours I agree, but what about Brandis or Akerman – how much more excruciating can you get..??
      Pity there is no objective measure for intelligence or charm, or honesty….the LNP would be several country miles behind the other offerings (well Lambie could be the exception, but even she is courteous and well educated compared to the LNP talking heads – and thankfully Cash does not get on very often).

  3. sean hosking

    I read this thinking there was going to be some analysis or insight at some point.

    1. aliso6

      Agree with Sean; a load of smart-arse cobbly gook!#coulddomuchbetterbutdon’tbother

  4. mikeb

    I’m sure the Q&A producers would just love to just pick whoever they want who is: articulate, interesting, relevant, able and willing. That’s a tough criteria to fill. They go back to the “old” standbys because they are a guaranteed talent whether you like them or not. When Bob Brown was active in politics people would complain that he was on radio all the time and why weren’t such & such for the Laborials given the same airtime. The fact was however that Brown was always up for an interview, & would go out of his way to oblige. Not many of the Laborials would do that.

  5. mpkh99

    My main growing dislike for Q & A is the mindless blood sport Tony Jones tries to make it and how he can not help himself stomping over an audience question almost to total extinction. He makes them often as meaningful as a “talk back call” to a shock jock such as Jones.

      1. leon knight

        Me too, but I reckon you can see a marked drop in standards since Turnbull started whispering in Scott’s and Guthrie’s ears….I often struggle to halt my twitching Off finger.

  6. bushby jane

    Don’t watch Q&A, but am interested in the breakdown of The Drum. There doesn’t seem to be the variety of more interesting people that there used to be, and I wish that the hosts were able to shut up a few regulars like Sue Boyce. Same with yesterday’s Insiders guest Michael Sutchbury, who completely took over the show without any adjudication from Barrie Cassidy.

    1. Duncan Gilbey

      Sutchbury had me yelling at the TV yesterday. He seemed genuinely upset that people could dare suggest that reality was not conforming to his economic models.

      1. klewso

        Stutchbury is such a blatant Limited News Party apologist – acting like it’s his role in life to counter what he sees as “progressive factoids” : with his own basket of cherry/hand-picked ones?
        Taylor was onto him, Cassidy just smiled (in amused wonder?) – even fellow-apologist Atkins seemed to pick that up yesterday?
        ….. At least Savva has a go at “The Party” every now and then – even if it is only when Abbott’s taking air? Abbott being able to do so much more with so much less than her St Peter after all.

        1. klewso

          “Sunday” anyway.

    2. leon knight

      Repulsive indeed, and he is usually tolerable, but I really spew when they get those twerps from the IPA on, why should they get a voice on the ABC at all – there is nothing to balance against their brand of propaganda..!!

    3. Amanda

      Totally agree Jane. Poor Lenore Taylor with her scratchy voice trying to make herself heard.

  7. Michele Cochrane

    I must have nodded off; when did Australia start celebrating Thanskgiving?

    1. The Curmudgeon

      Beat me to the punch: an odd reference indeed.

  8. colin skene

    I don’t watch it so I have no idea how any metric would be useful. I don’t need to watch it to be informed. Who cares?

  9. thelorikeet

    Q&A lost its mojo abut 2 years ago. Analysis like this is peremptory – a post portem on a pre mortem body (ie still (just) alive)

  10. thelorikeet

    Q&A lost its mojo abut 2 years ago. Analysis like this is peremptory – a post mortem on a pre mortem body (ie still (just) alive)