The Centrelink automated debt notices scheme is the result of years of cuts to the Department of Human Services by both Coalition and Labor governments, according to the public sector union.

A Senate committee investigating the government’s botched Centrelink debt notices system has been told this morning in its first hearing on the matter that far from resulting in a cost saving for the government as intended, the scheme has forced Centrelink staff to do more work under more pressure to resolve incorrect debt notices issued by the system.

CPSU national secretary Nadine Flood told the committee that DHS was “more focused on denying there was a problem and spinning the problem than actually dealing with it”.

Successive budget cuts, or “efficiency dividends” to the department had resulted in 5000 jobs going within the agency and meant that the decision to move to remove human oversight of the debt notices system was “absolutely based on the desire to save money”, Flood said. The result, however, meant that because of the thousands of false notices in the more than 300,000 notices issued by the agency so far, staff have been taken offline to deal with complex and difficult disputes with recipients over the false debts.

DHS has become an expert in Band-Aid solutions as it lurches from one crisis to the next,” she said. The department was also “vicious and draconian” in its response to staff speaking out and wasn’t keen on staff input in how these systems should operate, but staff were the ones having to deal with distressed Centrelink recipients. CPSU deputy secretary Lisa Newman said that while the department had reported a decline in physical threats against staff, their own members had seen a marked increase in threats and spitting at staff in recent months. 

The Australian Council of Social Service CEO Cassandra Goldie told the committee that there was a “culture of fear” around the notices scheme now, and the release of details of a Centrelink recipient to the media because that person had chosen to speak about their own issues had resulted in a “chilling effect” whereby people struggling with automated debt notices were now scared to talk about it.

Goldie said that for many of the 6,600 people who had first heard about their debt from a debt collector, they have been threatened with being taken to court, or having assets seized. The shift to sending initial notices from Centrelink via registered post should go some way to stopping people only hearing about their alleged debts by the time they’ve reached the debt collector, the committee heard. 

Both CPSU and ACOSS have called for the system to be suspended, and have requested to meet with Human Services Minister Alan Tudge, but both requests have been ignored.

The committee will also hear from the Australian Taxation Office and the Department of Human Services later today.

Peter Fray

Crikey is funded by readers like you.

Without subscribers, we cannot do what do. We can’t examine, explore or explain. We can’t take the spin, the weasel words, the waffle and lectures and render them meaningful. Without subscribers, we cannot help you understand the world better, so you can form your own views and opinions. That’s what we’re here to do, and that’s why we need you.

Now more than ever.

Peter Fray
Editor-In-Chief of Crikey

Join us today