New South Wales

Nov 22, 2016

Labor responds quickly to union leader’s domestic violence claims

The union movement can't demand "zero tolerance" for domestic violence and not take action against leaders involved in it.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

The labour movement and Labor's federal parliamentary leadership have responded quickly to yesterday's revelations of police accounts of domestic violence by the head of the New South Wales Postal & Telecommunications division of the Communications, Electrical and Plumbing Union of Australia, Jim Metcher. Metcher has been kicked out of the Labor Party at the instigation of Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Deputy (and NSW MP) Tanya Plibersek, the latter revealed this morning. Yesterday Aaron Patrick and David Marin-Guzman of The Australian Financial Review revealed an extensive series of assaults by Metcher on his family in 2007. Metcher pleaded guilty to six counts of assault, but the magistrate dismissed the matter on medical grounds. Metcher was, according to the Fin, ordered to have six months of psychiatric counselling. The article contains graphic detail from police reports about Metcher's physical attacks on his family and his abuse of them, including allegations he pinned his wife to the ground and rained up to 20 punches on her head and face. Police successfully obtained an apprehended violence order against Metcher in relation to his family. Victorian CEPU boss John Ellery responded quickly yesterday, describing the reports as "appalling behaviour of a type that is not acceptable in a civilised society." Influential Transport Workers Union head Tony Sheldon slammed Metcher, saying "even while many across the labour movement are fighting for family rights, like the rest of society we are not immune to domestic violence, as either perpetrators or victims". Other senior union figures also spoke out. Unions NSW stripped Metcher of his positions with that body yesterday afternoon. Plibersek now wants Metcher outed as head of his union branch as well, which would for a complete fall from grace for the once-powerful unionist. This morning Labor announced it was backing domestic violence campaigner Rosie Batty's call for an end to the cross-examination of victims of domestic violence by those they accuse in the Family Court. The story curiously continues to generate minimal coverage on social media, where incidents of domestic violence by high-profile figures are normally the subject of storms of outrage.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

2 comments

Leave a comment

2 thoughts on “Labor responds quickly to union leader’s domestic violence claims

  1. Shaun

    Really disappointed to hear this ‘refusing to sack = trivialising and normalising’ line repeated uncritically. Domestic violence is a problem that must be taken seriously by our legal system and society as a whole, but systematically removing abusers from public positions isn’t helpful. People, including FV perpetrators, need to work; virtue-signalling ‘resignations’ may sate moral outrage, but it does nothing to help survivors or aid in the rehabilitation of abusers. Let’s start talking more seriously about prevention.

  2. zut alors

    In Question Time Shorten invited Turnbull to support end of cross-examination of victims legislation but received the usual run-around & weasel words.

    Of course the silver-tongued Turnbull made the Coalition seem sympathetic & supportive but managed to avoid a simple ‘yes.’

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...