New South Wales

Nov 16, 2016

Is NSW Greens the new political home for Falun Gong?

A Greens private members' bill preventing NSW residents from getting organs from China has strong support from Falun Gong practitioners.

Josh Taylor — Journalist

Josh Taylor


David Shoebridge

Early in the morning in most Australian capital cities, they can be found meditating and exercising in matching yellow clothing while one in the group will find a busy walkway to stand and hand out flyers. Most people ignore them, but Falun Gong have caught the attention of the NSW Greens.

Falun Gong practitioners have been persecuted by the Chinese government since 1999. Those who are arrested are forced to denounce their beliefs, and those who don’t are tortured, forced into labour camps and imprisoned. Falun Gong members claim imprisoned members are forced to become live organ donors or are killed for their organs, which can be sold on the black market for up to US$250,000. The Chinese government denies prisoners are killed for their organs.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Is NSW Greens the new political home for Falun Gong?

  1. Mimi NL

    Hah. Where did the rumours come from? I practice Falun Gong and know people (other practitioners) who support other political parties too. We come from all walks of life and are not united by some political party. What a silly and unevidenced suggestion of using Falun Gong practitioners for ‘branch stacking’ in the Greens Party. I didn’t even know what branch stacking meant before this article. How cynical can you get?

    1. craig english

      Isn’t it strongly advised that practitioners don’t get involved in political matters?

      1. Mimi NL

        I’m talking about when we go to compulsory vote at elections, it’s not as though all Falun Gong practitioners are going to vote a certain party. Different people support or vote for different parties; including among practitioners, it’s not as though you can predict who will vote for which party. As for Falun Gong practitioners’ extent of involvement in politics –we’re not involved in politics. It’s not even politics, but practitioners are simply talking to politicians to appeal for help, for the inhumane persecution happening in China. That’s the extent of so called political involvement that I’m aware of, anyway. And just as if someone comes to your home and murders your children, I’m sure you’d also be appealing to your government, too, no matter which country or political system you’re in. And frankly, what’s wrong with that?

        1. craig english

          Certainly, the disgustingly inhumane treatment of Falun Gong practitioners in China requires addressing and is most expediently done so at a political level. I was just clarifying that supporting political parties didn’t necessarily equate to involvement within a party.

          1. Mimi NL

            That’s right, Craig.
            Back to my original point and comment– who is this source? Who are these rumours from? I point to an extract in “The Elements of Journalism” by Kovach & Rosenstiel (3rd ed, p114) for reference:— “Most of the limitations journalists face in trying to move from accuracy to truth are addressed, if not overcome, by being honest about the nature of their knowledge, why they trust it, and what efforts they make to learn more.
            Transparency has a second important virtue: It signals one’s respect for the audience. It allows the audience to judge the validity of the information, the process by which it was secured, and the motives and biases of the persons providing it. This also makes transparency the best protection against errors and deception by sources. It the best information one has comes from a potentially biased source, naming the source and acknowledging the source’s perspective will reveal to the audience the possible bias of the information—and may inhibit the source from deceiving as well. It will also compel the reporter to find the most authoritative sources possible.
            Transparency also helps establish that the journalist has a public-interest motive, which is the key to credibility. he willingness to be transparent is at the heart of establishing that the reporter is concerned with truth. The lie, or the mistake, is in pretending omniscience, or claiming greater knowledge than one has.
            … Unfortunately, too much journalism failes to reveal anything about methods, motives, and sources. Television newscasts, as a matter of course, will say simply “sources said,” a way of saving time on the air, yet most of these sources are hardly confidential.
            … Withholding information from the public in ways like this is a mistake. As citizens become more skeptical of both journalists and the political establishment, such disservices to the public bring journalism under greater suspicion.”

  2. Ron Champagne

    Congratulations to David Shoebridge to be the first one in Australia to put forward a bill to make it a criminal offense for anyone to go to China for an organ transplant knowing that the donor in China – more likely than not – has to be killed against his or her will. As the 2016 Australian of the year said, “the standard you walk past is the standard you accept”. Mr Shoebridge does not accept criminal behavior, neither do I.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details