Menu lock

South Australia

Aug 9, 2016

'Sick at heart': Weatherill pledges $200m after damning child protection review

A recurring theme in the royal commission’s findings about child protection in South Australia is funding -- or lack thereof. InDaily political journalist Tom Richardson reports.

Jay Weatherill

The magnitude of the task of overhauling South Australia’s maligned child protection regime has been laid bare in a royal commission report that demands a substantial injection of funds into a raft of structural reforms, including a wholesale rejection of current residential care systems.

Royal commissioner Margaret Nyland’s report, released yesterday after cabinet met to discuss its contents, highlights “a system overwhelmed by the volume and complexity of work, with notifications received every day relating to children living in dire circumstances who desperately need someone to take action on their behalf … in many cases the response comes so late that there is little choice to do anything other than to remove the child from their family”.

However, despite government speculation of a complete “re-write of the state’s child protection laws”, Nyland warns “the temptation to impose additional layers of policy and process to achieve sustainable change should be resisted”.

Instead, she wants what successive governments perhaps feared most — substantial new investment.

“System change does not come from imposing more regulation on how the work is to be done; it comes from a greater investment in growing the knowledge base of workers, both at a planning and service delivery level,” the report states.

Jay Weatherill today committed $200 million budgeted over the next four years to begin addressing the demands, noting that some of the reforms would “require considerable work and consultation”.

“My Government accepts full responsibility for the failings of the state’s child protection system in keeping children safe,” he said.

“I am sorry for failing in this most fundamental duty to the children in our care.”

Fronting media, Weatherill said he was “sick at heart” about the litany of failures documented, but warned “protection of children has to be everybody’s business”.

“No single agency can begin to bear these responsibilities alone,” he said.

The Premier argued his government was spending more than the national average per child on child protection measures, but conceded “we’re mot spending in the right place”.

He said there were now 3300 children in state care compared to a peak of 1200 when he was the minister responsible.

[The most shocking thing about the Four Corners footage: the abuse was legal]

Nyland’s is the latest in a series of dissertations on the troubled agency Families SA, and its findings both endorse and reject a range of recommendations that have come before it.

Nyland calls for the implementation of the long-ignored Layton report demand for the establishment of a children’s commissioner — a demand that has been taken up by the state opposition.

But she is less convinced about the call by state coroner Mark Johns, who last year concluded an inquiry into the death of Chloe Valentine, to examine a broadening of adoption provisions.

“The Commission is not persuaded that an increased emphasis on making children in care available for adoption is necessarily appropriate, when fundamental considerations of the child’s best interests are brought into account,” the report states.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

2 thoughts on “‘Sick at heart’: Weatherill pledges $200m after damning child protection review

  1. Rex Auton

    “he was “sick at heart””
    I rather think that every state has the same problem – politicians that are about to be sick at heart.

  2. CML

    I live in SA, and this is just the latest beat-up over Families SA.
    I would like to know why this is all the government’s fault…where are the parents, grandparents and other relatives of these children? It seems all those who should take some responsibility for what is happening to our children have a lot to say AFTER the disasters have occurred…along the lines that the government is entirely to blame!
    As a mother and grandmother, I think it is MY responsibility to be proactive, if ever our grandchildren were at risk. Thankfully they are not, and never likely to be.
    Nobody wants to protect their own, it seems…it is always someone else’s problem apparently. So how many of those people currently abusing the Premier and his government will accept a tax rise/levy to pay for the inadequacies of those who refuse to accept their family responsibilities???
    No one?…thought not!!

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.