Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Crikey Says

Aug 9, 2016

For free speech, 18C is the least of it

Yes, 18C is a barrier to free speech. But there is a much worse one.

“Free speech is free speech, there’s no qualification to it, let’s just remove 18C entirely and everything that goes with it,” Senator David Leyonhjelm told Insiders on Sunday, announcing plans to move a private member’s bill to amend the Racial Discrimination Act.

We agree that free speech is free speech, and although Australia does not have the right to free speech, it should. However, there is a vastly greater threat to free speech that no one is talking about — Australia’s overreaching defamation laws.

The Anglican church has threatened two youth leaders with a defamation lawsuit for reporting alleged sexual abuse of children, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse has heard. One of the leaders said “he and his wife did not report the ­alleged abuse to police as they were worried about legal action following the bishop’s warning”.

In a country where a sitting treasurer can successfully sue a news outlet for a completely true and balanced article showing he was charging lobbyists money for access to his time and insiders are afraid to report serious crimes against children because of fear of a defamation lawsuit, there is a long way to go before 18C is our major impediment to free speech.

Advertisement

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

9 comments

Leave a Reply

Notify of
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Rex Auton
Member

Arguably all of the so-called human rights can be taken away by legislation.
The only right that is fundamental is the right to dignity – based on recognition of the intrinsic value of a human.
Hence it is not acceptable to use free speech to damage human dignity.

Duncan Gilbey
Member

For God’s sake, of all the things that parliament could fix, these clods reckon that 18c is the top priority?

Interrobanging On
Member

Banning the burqa also…get those two things through and it will be Australia Felix for all!

Hunt Ian
Member
The right to free speech should be one of our basic rights but so should freedom of association, freedom of occupation and freedom from threats to life and limb. Simple minded thinkers, like Lyenholm, suppose that our right to free speech should be absolute but as the Nazis showed in the Weimer Republic, freedom to denigrate Jews paved the way for subsequent murder of millions of Jews. This is why 18c should be defended. Similarly, freedom of speech should be limited to protect freedom of association, freedom of occupation and equality of opportunity, to prevent people being shunned by others… Read more »
klewso
Member

We saw how Leyonhjelm reacts when the subject of free speech, in that cameo of his on The Chaser?

CML
Member

According to Senator Jacqui Lambie on ABC RN Drive [Monday], the ‘NO’ vote has the numbers in the Senate, so the repeal of 18C is already over!
On to more important issues perhaps?!!

Interrobanging On
Member

But right-wing nutters get *obsessed* about particular things. Asking a right wing nutter to give up an obsession is like asking the sun not to shine.

AR
Member

How can I use 18C to obviate the Census?

ech0 8ravo
Member

Fast forward to the Brave New World of the TPP (TAP etc) and where a consumer campaign foregrounding a dryer that bursts into flames might sit within that framework?

wpDiscuz

Advertisement

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.