It might feel like the campaign that never ends, but the longer campaign has not led to an increase in media coverage of our politicians, according to Isentia. By the end of the 2013 election (which was much shorter than the eight-week campaign we've all suffered through) there had been 286,569 mentions of then-opposition leader Tony Abbott across press, radio, TV and online, and 283,819 mentions of then-prime minister Kevin Rudd. As of yesterday, there were 279,004 mentions of Turnbull, and 242,575 mentions of Shorten. A spokespeson for Isentia told Crikey that there had been a significant drop in volume of talkback calls and social media engagement with the election, pointing to a lack of passion and interest from the general public. Often the top issues in the media that week were different from the top issues being discussed on talkback and on social media. This is not to say that voters are not hearing about the election. As of this week, close to every second ad during the evening news on commercial TV is from one of the parties, unions, or interest groups about the election. Essential this week reported that close to three in four voters say they've seen a TV ad this election from a political party, followed by mailouts, emails, and phone calls. Just one hour after Turnbull said yesterday "what political parties say they will support and oppose at one time is not necessarily ultimately what they will do", Labor produced a scare ad warning of Turnbull backing down on his promises if he wins the election.
Think the media won’t shut up about the damn election? It was worse in 2013
There were far more mentions of Tony Abbott and Kevin Rudd during a much shorter campaign than there have been of Malcolm Turnbull and Bill Shorten.