On 60 Minutes

Former 60 Minutes executive producer and leader of the investigation into the Lebanon operation Gerald Stone writes: Re. “Nine, not the sound guy to blame for kidnapping” (yesterday). I don’t expect apologies from Crikey. I do expect fact-based commentary.

The Spanish child kidnapping story was commissioned in 1980, the second year of the program.

The Tasmanian mother took the child herself  after arranging a meeting with her estranged husband in a busy Barcelona café. During a few moments when he was distracted she simply walked out, infant in arms, and hailed a taxi. That was the so-called ‘getaway car’ and the Nine crew was nowhere near.

Save up to 50% on a year of Crikey

Choose what you pay, from $99.

Sign up now

Later, the mother and her determined publican father — along with our crew — did drive a hire car some nine hours to a seaport near to Gibraltar. It was highly unlikely Spanish police would have set up road blocks on all major highways out of Barcelona looking for the child, especially since the estranged husband’s own family members felt he had done the wrong thing by stealing the baby from his Tasmanian home in the first place.

I suppose if you were in that second “escape car” you might be anxious about a flat tyre or accident that could bring you undone.

60 Minutes in those early years established itself as determined  to bring viewers the human face behind every important issue. In a multi-cultural country like Australia, the tragedies caused by marital breakups between parents of different nationalities and religions had been totally ignored up to then.

Yes, I thought the risks — though remote compared to  modern-day Beirut — were worth taking in 1980. How many custody disputes have been covered since then?

Mathison v Abbott

James Burke writes: Re. “Mayne: What James Mathison needs to do to topple Tony Abbott” (yesterday). If James Mathison wants to unseat Tony Abbott, he could do what Labor never tried: attack him. Plenty to work with, if he’s willing.

Fizza

Les Heimann writes: Re. “A tedious debate for a tedious campaign: why last night was a dud” (yesterday). Turnbull is more and more the hollow man whilst Shorten just can’t cut through.

Applying any compass to this campaign is simply not possible as the two main protagonists have not a skerrick of conviction between them. So, being directionless and utterly scripted will not allow anyone to be attracted.

I am dismayed at this black hole of conviction because if ever there was an opportunity to be a leader it is now. Right now.

I subscribe to Crikey because I believe in a free, open and independent media where news and opinions can be published that I can both agree with and be challenged by.

As a Crikey subscriber I always feel more informed and able to think more critically about issues and current affairs – even when they don’t always reflect my own political viewpoint or lived experience.

Jess
Singapore

Join us and save up to 50%

Subscribe before June 30 and choose what you pay for a year of Crikey. Save up to 50% or, chip in extra and get one of our limited edition Crikey merch packs.

Join Now