If a politician is kissing a baby and no one is around to report on it, has the baby really been kissed at all?

This week, and perhaps for a few more, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age have pulled their reporters from the campaign buses. Fairfax photographers will continue to provide a visual record of the campaign, but for now, none of the Fairfax press gallery scribes will turn up to press conferences around the country as the contenders go town-to-town pitching for votes.

“Fairfax Media is still travelling with the leaders,” said federal editor and Canberra bureau chief Bevan Shields. Snappers Andrew Meares and Alex Ellinghausen are still there — Shields says they have “years of experience covering elections and federal politics, and are filing unrivaled images and video from the campaign every hour”.

Invest in the journalism that makes a difference.

EOFY Sale. A year for just $99.

SAVE 50%

“We have dozens of reporters spread across our newsrooms in Canberra, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth providing what I think is the nation’s best political coverage. We’ve had a great response from our readers and subscribers so far,” he said.

“We’re only into week three of an eight-week election campaign and have many more exciting things to come ahead of July 2. I think there’s never been a more exciting time to cover an election campaign.”

The length of the campaign appears a key reason for the pull-back. Crikey understands other news organisations have been having similar discussions about the campaign buses and whether it’s worth having reporters on them the whole eight weeks.

As Crikey and others have previously pointed out, going on the buses is expensive. In the Saturday SMH, Latika Bourke suggested a $40,000 to $50,000 figure to send a single journalist on the trail. The buses and planes are chartered by the parties, but the cost of this, as well as of the five-star hotels they stay at, are paid by the media. But despite Fairfax’s general belt-tightening, the withdrawal isn’t about costs, sources say; it’s more an editorial judgement about how best to provide coverage of a long campaign.

Several opinion pieces in Fairfax have recently questioned whether the campaign buses are worth it. Bourke’s piece covered what reporters can expect:

“They will get a few hours of access to the leader at drinks one evening and five minutes on the bus when the leader decides to jump on to schmooze — if they’re lucky.  At worst they will be told five minutes before a media conference of the major policy that’s being announced.”

And earlier, the Financial Review‘s political editor Laura Tingle lamented the stream of inanities from the trail on social media. Tingle wrote:

“Media organisations have, as usual, sent their young journalists out ‘on the trail’ with the leaders. They are under pressure to file anything that moves. The pressure to file is only the greater because the relative cost of the travel has risen exponentially when compared with disappearing revenue bases.”

The current model with campaign coverage is for the senior reporters to stay in Canberra, filtering out the trivial when writing their more authoritative pieces, while the juniors do the grunt work reporting everything that happens day to day.

Because of this, it can seem like the on-the-ground reporters don’t contribute much. But those on the buses defended the value in going on the trail when we asked.

Without reporters on the buses, it can be hard for a news organisation to put pressure on the campaign to answer questions. Responses to questions from campaign HQ are scripted and carefully vetted, so catching a politician at a door stop remains the best way to force them to react or respond to a story. Everyone, including the senior oracles in Canberra, watches the press conferences. And it’s up to the trail reporters to ask the questions.

It’s also useful to get a sense of, and spend time with, a politician’s staff, as well as the general feeling of the leaders, another said. A lot of contacts and a lot of impressions can only be built by being there in person, not from watching a newsroom television.

But is that worth losing reporters to hours in transit every day, going from venue to venue at the mercy of the parties? For a week or two at least, Fairfax has decided not.

Save this EOFY while you make a difference

Australia has spoken. We want more from the people in power and deserve a media that keeps them on their toes. And thank you, because it’s been made abundantly clear that at Crikey we’re on the right track.

We’ve pushed our journalism as far as we could go. And that’s only been possible with reader support. Thank you. And if you haven’t yet subscribed, this is your time to join tens of thousands of Crikey members to take the plunge.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
SAVE 50%