Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Uncategorized

Apr 5, 2016

Essential: voters want to dump religious tax exemption

Australians want an end to the taxation exemption enjoyed by church, this week's Essential Report shows.

Australians strongly support ending the tax-exempt status of religious organisations, according to today’s Essential Report, while the major parties remain locked at 50-50 on voting intention.

Nearly two-thirds of voters oppose the religious tax exemption, while just 24% support it. The strongest opposition, unexpectedly, comes from older voters: 73% of over-55s oppose the exemption.

image1essential copy

There’s a very high level of “strong disapproval” across all voting groups on the question, and a low “don’t know” response, indicating views are heartfelt, even among conservative voters.

However, voters are evenly split over Malcolm Turnbull’s failed proposal for a state income tax, which was launched last week ahead of Friday’s Council of Australian Governments and then sank without trace. Voters split 34% approving and disapproving of the proposal, with 31% saying they didn’t know. And while Labor voters are more hostile and Coalition voters more approving and less likely to say they don’t know, the gaps aren’t enormous. Greens voters appear confused by the idea, splitting 32% approval/38% disapproval/31% don’t know.

That’s a very different outcome from Newspoll’s question on the subject today, which elicited 58% opposition to 19% support, but the difference reflects the question asked and is a good example of how nuances around a question can dramatically alter results. Essential asked It has been proposed that the states and territories be allowed to charge some form of income tax to be used to fund services like health and education. It would mean Federal income tax rates would be reduced. Would you support or oppose this proposal?

Newspoll’s question was The Federal government is considering a change to the tax system that will enable the states and territories to levy income taxes in addition to the commonwealth. Based on what you know or have heard, are you in favour of or opposed to the states and territories being able to levy income tax in this way?

Unlike Newspoll, Essential doesn’t identify the source of the proposal, which minimises the skewing effect of voting intention — when voters know which side of politics has put forward an idea, they tend to react more based on their voting intention than when they don’t. But that’s overwhelmed by the fact that Newspoll’s question also refers to state income tax in addition to existing taxes, whereas Essential notes that federal taxes would be reduced, and also notes the link with health and education, which voters tend to always want more spending on. In short, Newspoll portrays the proposal in a way less appealing to voters, even if it’s not less accurate.

On voting intention, the Coalition is down a point to 42% and Labor is down a point to 37%; the Greens are up one to 10% to produce an unchanged two-party preferred result of 50%-50%. (For those comparing, the primary figures for today’s Newspoll are 41%, 36% and 11%, respectively, producing 51-49 to Labor).

There’s better news for the government on the economy, however: voter sentiment about the current state of the economy has finally turned around, with 32% saying it is good or very good compared to 27% saying it is poor or very poor. It might not sound like much, but it’s the first time since 2014 (just before the notorious 2014 budget) that voters have viewed the economy favourably; in January it was 28% positive and 31% negative. However, the optimism doesn’t extend to the direction of the economy, with 37% saying it is moving in the wrong direction, compared to 32% who say it is in the right direction. That compares to 38%/30% in January. As always, voting intention strongly influences the way people view the economy, with Labor, Greens and “other” voters all regarding the economy as poor and going in the wrong direction (46% of Labor voters and 57% of Greens voters think the economy is going in the wrong direction), while Coalition voters can only see economic sunshine: 49% of Coalition voters say the economy is good and 56% say it is travelling in the right direction.

And shadow treasurer Chris Bowen, who has performed strongly in recent months, is gaining on Treasurer Scott Morrison: 26% of voters trust Morrison to handle the economy compared to 23% who trust Bowen; that compares to 26%-19% in January and 27%-18% in November. But 51% say they don’t know, suggesting that neither politician is cutting through with most voters.

Advertisement

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

5 comments

Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “Essential: voters want to dump religious tax exemption

  1. CML

    As I understand it, Essential asks their polling questions from a static ‘pool’ of voters, choosing a sample each week.
    Newspoll takes their sample from the general public each fortnight. This seems more likely to demonstrate change over-all, IMHO.
    In any case, recent polling does not look good for the government…thank goodness!!

  2. AR

    The proportion (virtually identical across the parties) who want the religious to lose their tax exemption is similar to those in favour of equal marriage – when will the pollies shirk that issue as well?
    Add the question to that damned plebiscite!

  3. JMNO

    I am not sure why Bernard is surprised that older voters oppose the exemption. An assumption of sclerotic brains in those over 55? An assumption that they are more religious? Perhaps it is their accumulated knowledge and experience and wisdom that make them the strongest opponents

  4. Pain Train

    I would avoid any religious group like the plague who receives tax exemption status. This means they are doing something wrong in accordance with their state sponsorship.

    The true believers are a “little flock” not a corrupt gigantic monolithic institution. Come out of her my people.

  5. peterh_oz

    Their charitable work should be tax deductible, just like my donations to charities. But running a shop, nursing home, retirement village or child care is not charitable. Those activities are competing on the open market, and they have huge benefits that their competition do not. Coles & Woolies can’t use their market power in that way yet this mob can.

    Not only that, if they continue to discriminate against portions of the population they should be charged, not rewarded by my taxes.

Advertisement

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.