
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull’s plan for states to raise their own income tax came to a screeching halt on Friday after the states and territories could not agree to his proposal in the Council of Australian Governments meeting.
“The states will not be levying an income tax and the Commonwealth will not be increasing income tax,” Turnbull said, killing his latest tax policy, which lasted less than a week of public scrutiny.
Turnbull could not reach an agreement with the premiers and chief ministers of Australia’s states and territories for his radical proposal for states to raise their own income tax to fund their services in exchange for the Commonwealth cutting government grants and lowering its income tax rate. He said there was no appetite for the reform but said it was his job to “push the envelope” and to try and lead the reform.
The leaders did, however, agree to consider proposals to share personal income tax revenue with the states, and pursue initiatives for the states to provide real-time data on how government money is spent. Turnbull said the income tax sharing proposal would make it easier for states to access resources and would potentially fix the expensive-to-administer grants scheme.
The states did secure $2.9 billion in funding for hospital services from July 2017 to June 2020, with growth in Commonwealth funding capped at 6.5% each year. Looming large was the $80 billion Commonwealth funding commitment to schools and health made out to 2024-25 by the Gillard government, which was cut in the disastrous 2014 Abbott government budget. Turnbull and the state premiers argued that the agreement had never been funded. WA Premier Colin Barnett, for example:
“I was the only person here today who was here then, that time ago, and I remember that COAG meeting very, very clearly. It was somewhat chaotic. There were little private meetings in different rooms as the then Prime Minister and state premiers scurried from room to room and the $80 billion figure appeared. I didn’t at the time ever believe that was a realistic number or that that could be properly funded.”
Labor leaders, however, argued that it didn’t reverse the decisions of the 2014 budget. Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews:
“I’d just ask people to remain focused on the context here and whilst an agreement today is a positive, there’s no getting away from or getting around or politely explaining away the fact that many billions of dollars will not be flowing to hospitals in my state and hospitals right across the nation as a result of decisions made in the 2014 Budget. They are not reversed today, and that’s a really important point for us all to acknowledge, in a decent way but in a fundamentally honest way.”
Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk:
“There is still a huge gap. And that means it’s going to place a huge strain on our hospitals. It will mean more work for our doctors, our nurses, our administrators.”
After Turnbull indicated on Thursday that the Commonwealth government could pull funding from public schools and keep funding private schools, no agreement has been made on Commonwealth funding for schools, which is due to run out at the end of 2017. The Commonwealth has still not committed to the “full Gonski” funding for the remaining two years, Turnbull said:
“We are not wedded to that particular — the ‘full Gonski’, whatever that means. The full Gonski I went to school with in 1967.”
The state leaders again expressed concern that if there was a plan to continue to provide federal funding to private schools but not public schools it would be “detrimental to the nation,” in the words of Palaszczuk. ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr said the issue was “a line in the sand” for the ACT.
The states turning on Turnbull so quickly raised questions on whether the prime minister had suffered a humiliating defeat, but Turnbull told Sky News on Sunday that the states — with the exception of WA — now can no longer ask for more money from the Commonwealth without being willing to take on the responsibility for raising taxes.
“The reality is … if they’re not prepared to make the case to their citizens through their parliament for higher taxes, they cannot seriously or credibly ask us to raise taxes to give money for them to spend.”
Labor is now preparing to campaign on the issue, with Shorten saying over this weekend that Turnbull had commenced a “war” with the states on “double taxation”.
The COAG communique also states the leaders have agreed to more work on indigenous economic development, reducing violence against women and children.
Turnbull announced that the Commonwealth would also draft legislation, in co-operation with the states, to bring on another tranche of national security legislation referred to as post-sentence preventative detention scheme for high-risk terrorist offenders. COAG agreed in principle to develop a nationally consistent scheme for pre-charge detention for terrorism suspects, too, based on the NSW model, but the ACT is reserving its position.

11 thoughts on “Turnbull ditches income tax plan after states revolt”
westral
April 3, 2016 at 10:31 amIf this was Tony Abbott still in power, we would call this another one of his captain’s picks, Malcolm is just like Tony but smoother in his delivery.
The logic behind the move – I promised I would not increase taxes so I’ll force the states to do it and while the states are happy to spend money they want none of the pain of raising it.
En Quiry
April 3, 2016 at 1:58 pmStraw man: States income tax.
Objective: to stop increasing tax for schools and hospitals.
Why: LNP will not do it – see Turnbull interview. Need to shift blame for attrition to States.
SWOT: taxpayers have reached max tax including bracket creep; only companies could fund the increase; pollies must keep companies and big shareholders happy or lose pollie skin; government advisers and technocrats must cover this threat for pollies.
Reality: vast wealth pours out of Australia unchecked while wage and salary earners pay. Country desperately needs skilled workforce and entrepreneurs (ie. 21st century education) and ageing population desperately needs better health care.
Outcome against all odds: the resounding defeat of the States income tax play has consolidated the national and federal responsibility for schools and hospitals and the importance of services, and national unity in service delivery and fiscal policy.
cartoonmick
April 4, 2016 at 12:07 amSomewhere, in a quiet backroom, hidden from public eyes, sits the master of innovation, THE Minister for Thought Bubbles.
The minister’s maniacal laughter echoes thorough the corridors of power as fresh bubbles flow from the imaginative mind of this crazed person.
The bubbles are fed to the politicians controlling our nation and presented to the gullable public as yet another brilliant plan.
Oh, what an innovative crew we have running our ship.
What will they do next ?
The mind boggles at the mere thought of the possibilities.
Maybe this cartoon can give us a clue as to what could happen . . . . .
https://cartoonmick.wordpress.com/editorial-political/#jp-carousel-968
Cheers
Mick
Norman Hanscombe
April 4, 2016 at 1:49 pmNo one should doubt that obe of Turnbull’s greatest strengths is the incompetence of those who set out to criticise him but have scant understanding of why so many Australian Citizens know he’s the Nation’s best potential Leader.
Jaybuoy
April 4, 2016 at 2:53 pmTurnbull is trying to use his Goldman Sachs wedge techniques which might be appropriate when it’s a commercial standoff but he’s dealing with the nations health and education outcomes here..where’ the plans..the latest offering wasn’t even a thought bubble..
David Hand
April 4, 2016 at 2:59 pmSo the land mine laid by Gillard out beyond the forward estimates has gone off. Or been defused. All this talk about Turnbull not knowing what he is doing badly underestimates him. It may well not come off and Shorten, Crikey, Fairfax and the Guardian et al may succeed in labelling him a failure but that’s a risk worth taking to escape Gillard’s shameless entrapment.
The proposal to enable States to raise income tax which they declined gives him an escape hatch from Gillard’s unfunded social welfare projects – something you acknowledge in the article. He is now saying, “We offered to enable the States to fund the Gillard social welfare promises and they declined, so we are not doing it either.”
Time will tell.
Wayne Cusick
April 4, 2016 at 4:45 pmThe proposed state income tax would either have not raised an extra cent (the Commonwealth reducing its rates by the amount the states charge), in which case the schools funding would be the same, or the states would be free to increase the tax to the desired amount.
As for a social welfare promise, I think that school funding is an investment in Australia’s future.
Unlike other welfare, such as negative gearing, capital gains tax discounts, private health rebate, superannuation concessions, etc.
Dog's Breakfast
April 4, 2016 at 5:37 pm“The reality is … if they’re not prepared to make the case to their citizens through their parliament for higher taxes, they cannot seriously or credibly ask us to raise taxes to give money for them to spend.”
What a dick! I don’t want to take any unpopular decisions, like raising the amount of taxes to cover what people want to spend, so I’ll hand it over.
And what about those minefields that Peter Costello and John Howard left the nation. Superannuation concessions for the rich that left a demographic time-bomb, halving the capital gains tax, unnecessary or even profligate income tax cuts for the high earners. Or the measures that the Gillard government brought in to raise revenue that were voted down by Abbott, like removing the private health insurance rebate, tax on superannuation earnings.
Gillard’s land mines would leave Australia a better, fairer place, while Costello’s just benefit the rich and leave the nation a pauper. I’ll wager that Gillard’s legacy is a lot better than Costello’s, and that history sees it that way.
James O'Neill
April 4, 2016 at 8:00 pmThe delusional state of some Liberals was never more clearly illustrated than the news tonight that Kevin Andrews would be available to serve as Prime Minister if asked!
AR
April 4, 2016 at 9:20 pmTalcum seems to think that when the States ceded the power to levy an income tax that it meant it belong to the Commonwealth rather than being the clearing house to redistribute funding for national responsibilities that the states with smaller populations could not meet.
The revenue isn’t meant to be kept under the federal bed, it is for disbursement.
I wonder why OneHand is babbling about Gillard so much today – has Menzies House decided that the crib sheet must try to distract from the ineptitude of Talcum and the Uglies clamouring behind him? Obfuscation as always.