Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter



Mar 18, 2016

Shorten’s sweet, Mal’s a mess, as parties trade roles

Roles are being reversed and positions swapped as politics takes a turn for the contrary in the lead up to the election.



“Let’s be content, and the times lament, you see the world turn’d upside down.”

English Civil War ballad

Politics in 2016 is not so much playing out unexpectedly as entirely opposite to expectations. Indeed, it has completely inverted what appeared to be the natural order of things — this week above all.

The sight of both the Greens and Labor voting in the Senate against bringing on a same-sex marriage bill, while attacking each other for failing to support it, was only the most trivial example of role reversals — as is the government refusing to bring on its own Australian Building and Construction Commission bill, which it wants to use as a double dissolution trigger, for a vote.

Much more significant was the contrast between Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Last year, the core narrative of Australian politics was that the restoration of Turnbull to the Liberal leadership set the nation up for a period of moderate, intelligent leadership by a charismatic, popular leader (aided by a Treasurer who had proven himself skilled at difficult portfolios) who would easily see off a plodder like Shorten. Shorten’s leadership itself could’ve been in danger — especially given his voter approval numbers were (and are) abysmal. The only thing that seemed to save him was that no one else in Labor thought they had a chance against Turnbull.

But this week, it was the stolid Shorten who looked the confident leader of a united party offering substance and intelligent policy. He has a suite of solid tax policies under his belt and a shadow Treasurer who is demonstrating why so many people inside and outside Labor have long rated him so highly. Shorten went to the Press Club and spoke about unemployment and underemployment; the following day he launched a paper by opposition spokesperson on families and payments Jenny Macklin on inequality. Those godawful zingers have been curtailed; he still uses them, but they’re better, and better delivered. He looks and sounds more natural.

Meantime Turnbull faced an outright rebellion by the lunatic right on Safe Schools, including by Tony Abbott, under whom Safe Schools had been launched. Turnbull himself has said nothing while the most vile comments have been uttered by his own backbenchers. The far right, it appears, now has more power in the government than it did under Tony Abbott. Turnbull’s Treasurer had to admit the core rationale for tax reform as spruiked by the government for so long — personal income tax cuts — weren’t likely to feature in the “tax reform package”. To give the impression of an active agenda in the absence of meaningful tax reform, Turnbull held a media conference to announce some board appointments, then complained when journalists asked about other topics and walked out. Then the government backflipped and handed the Nationals a win on an effects test in competition law, which the economic hard heads in the Liberal Party oppose.

That in itself confirmed another contrary development: the Business Council of Australia is on a serious losing streak, having failed in its quest to impose a higher GST on the rest of us while slashing corporate taxes for its big business members, and now losing out on an effects test. While lower taxes might be a permanent hope of the BCA, it has fought an effects test ferociously — something that presumably is unrelated to Richard Goyder, CEO of Wesfarmers, being on the board of the BCA. The once-influential BCA is starting to look politically toxic — and Liberal powerbroker Michael Kroger’s call for CEO Jennifer Westacott to resign is looking more and more on-point.

Beyond all that, the government’s drift and indecision has carried it back to parity with Labor in the polls and dented Malcolm Turnbull’s standing with voters. There’s no one in Canberra who will tip a Labor win, currently — the expectation is the government will get back with a diminished majority. But when an opposition purposefully leads the policy debate over a confused government; Bill Shorten and Malcolm Turnbull trade places; the right is allowed to run rampant by a moderate leader; and one of the Liberal Party’s biggest business allies appears to have a reverse-Midas touch, we’re living in confusing times indeed.


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

21 thoughts on “Shorten’s sweet, Mal’s a mess, as parties trade roles

  1. klewso

    Again, it’s taken Kroger and others long enough to wake up to Westacott – perhaps she has outgrown her usefulness?

  2. paddy

    [ There’s no one in Canberra who will tip a Labor win, currently —]

    LOL. Never say never. As someone said not so long ago

  3. AR

    The Evil of Two Lessers (who think that they are permanent Lessees).
    Once there was the Greens to keep hope alive but the descent of the Abominatio0n, the Black Wiggle, determined to be the Cheryl Lees/Meg Kernow du jour and destroy his party when it is needed most, we are facing a bleak future indeed.
    Kick out the Jams, Eat the Rich, everything 60s is now more urgent than ever.

  4. Angela

    Labor’s “not good with money”. True or false?

    Until Labor has a reasonable comeback for this, the Australian public will not trust them to manage the economy.

    Perception is everything.

  5. AR

    Angela – alas you are correct, “Perception is everything.“, that facts be buggered.

  6. David Hand

    The government knows exactly what it’s doing. Senate voting reform is the big issue of the week, subordinating everything else. The “government in chaos” theme is just early campaigning by Crikey for your preferred party.

    If Labor can put together a compelling case for election and persuade enough people to vote for them, good on them.

  7. tonysee

    He [Shorten] looks and sounds more natural … meantime Turnbull faced an outright rebellion by the lunatic right …

    Pretty much covers it.

    It should come as no surprise really. Shorten had to relax into the job eventually and Turnbull was nobbled by the Right last time (with a little help from some own goals).

    Maybe Shorten got to point where he thought he was on a hiding to nothing, so he may as well go for it. Having made that decision, his ‘media presence’ is not so stiff and contrived. He’s no Malcolm, but Malcolm’s gloss is wearing thin.

  8. Dog's Breakfast

    “If Labor can put together a compelling case for election…”

    Well that’s already a job done. For the first time in living memory we will be going to an election with a government with no policies, and an opposition with a fistful.

    “and persuade enough people to vote for them,”

    Well that would be relatively easy except for this;

    “Labor’s “not good with money”. True or false?

    Until Labor has a reasonable comeback for this, the Australian public will not trust them to manage the economy.”

    I won’t presume to know which side Angela sits on, but the fact that this is even debated shows that the Australian public have zero understanding of politics, economics, and basic facts.

    That is Labor’s problem.

  9. Duncan Gilbey

    “The government knows exactly what it’s doing.”

    What? Ripping itself apart?

  10. Mike Smith

    Labor’s “not good with money, but the LNP are far worse”. True or false?

  11. Jaybuoy

    Turns out the great explainer wouldn’t be able to describe how a pig got dirty.. as for Shorten he’s not known as lucky Bill for nothing..this government is starting to smell like Campbell Newmans…right wing nutjobs led by a Spiv..

  12. sang froid

    Yes, the coalition has been on a steep downhill slope these past weeks. However, to me, the last 12 hours has affirmed that Labor is unfit to govern. What to do?

  13. sang froid

    Hey Dog’s – do you honestly see Shorten a PM material?? Cringeworthy ….

  14. Angela

    @Michael, I reckon Labor get a raw deal about their handling of the economy, however that myth continues to be perpetuated. The Libs will stress this as part of their election campaign – you can bet on it.

  15. Angela

    @Dog’s breakfast. Not everyone keeps up to date with politics. I’d venture that most Australians don’t even know how the Senate preference voting system works (I taught my daughter when she was 9yo!)

    The catchcry that Labor are terrible with money and just spend, spend, spend is a myth that has morphed into almost fact. My point is that unless Labor start vigorously defending their economic record, the Australian public will have no faith in Labor’s ability to manage the economy. And the economy, jobs is going to be one of the big issues this election.

    Malcolm still has loads of political capital to use. Whether he deserves it or not is another issue.

  16. bushby jane

    I also don’t understand why labor is believed to be less able to manage the economy; facts actually tell a different story. They do need to go out in 3 word slogans which apparently the GP understand and tell the electorate so.
    I think Shorten seems fine to be a PM, I suppose you thought the cringeworthy Abbott was OK sang froid.

  17. sang froid

    Busby – Good heavens, I can’t think how to describe Abbott in a few words. Cringeworthy – yes. More an idiot.

  18. Venise Alstergren

    The hallowed belief that Liberal governments are better at managing money is just that. A myth.

    If the radical rightards are so convinced their way is the right way, they should have the guts to start their own political party. Oops, perhaps the death of the DLP once Bartholomew Augustine Santamaria passed his use by date, is still a nasty sore in their collective memories.

  19. klewso

    Isn’t Christensen the new leader of the Limited News Party – or is he just the Education Minister?

  20. drsmithy

    Until Labor has a reasonable comeback for this, the Australian public will not trust them to manage the economy.

    Perception is everything.

    Labor has plenty of comebacks, but ultimately little control over perception as they do not define the narrative.

  21. Darren Tartis

    It has always surprised me that Australia could elect a party that takes the view that poverty is a moral issue to be dealt with by punishment.

    I think that view is based on the idea that the distribution of intelligence is biased towards higher income groups.

    There might also be a view that God rewards the good people so that it is wrong to interfere with the punishment of being poor or disabled.


https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/03/18/shortens-sweet-mals-a-mess-as-parties-trade-roles/ == https://www.crikey.com.au/free-trial/==https://www.crikey.com.au/subscribe/

Show popup

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

Free Trial form on Pop Up

Free Trial form on Pop Up
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.