Menu lock

Federal

Mar 18, 2016

Shorten’s sweet, Mal’s a mess, as parties trade roles

Roles are being reversed and positions swapped as politics takes a turn for the contrary in the lead up to the election.

“Let’s be content, and the times lament, you see the world turn’d upside down.”

English Civil War ballad

Politics in 2016 is not so much playing out unexpectedly as entirely opposite to expectations. Indeed, it has completely inverted what appeared to be the natural order of things — this week above all.

The sight of both the Greens and Labor voting in the Senate against bringing on a same-sex marriage bill, while attacking each other for failing to support it, was only the most trivial example of role reversals — as is the government refusing to bring on its own Australian Building and Construction Commission bill, which it wants to use as a double dissolution trigger, for a vote.

Much more significant was the contrast between Opposition Leader Bill Shorten and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Last year, the core narrative of Australian politics was that the restoration of Turnbull to the Liberal leadership set the nation up for a period of moderate, intelligent leadership by a charismatic, popular leader (aided by a Treasurer who had proven himself skilled at difficult portfolios) who would easily see off a plodder like Shorten. Shorten’s leadership itself could’ve been in danger — especially given his voter approval numbers were (and are) abysmal. The only thing that seemed to save him was that no one else in Labor thought they had a chance against Turnbull.

But this week, it was the stolid Shorten who looked the confident leader of a united party offering substance and intelligent policy. He has a suite of solid tax policies under his belt and a shadow Treasurer who is demonstrating why so many people inside and outside Labor have long rated him so highly. Shorten went to the Press Club and spoke about unemployment and underemployment; the following day he launched a paper by opposition spokesperson on families and payments Jenny Macklin on inequality. Those godawful zingers have been curtailed; he still uses them, but they’re better, and better delivered. He looks and sounds more natural.

Meantime Turnbull faced an outright rebellion by the lunatic right on Safe Schools, including by Tony Abbott, under whom Safe Schools had been launched. Turnbull himself has said nothing while the most vile comments have been uttered by his own backbenchers. The far right, it appears, now has more power in the government than it did under Tony Abbott. Turnbull’s Treasurer had to admit the core rationale for tax reform as spruiked by the government for so long — personal income tax cuts — weren’t likely to feature in the “tax reform package”. To give the impression of an active agenda in the absence of meaningful tax reform, Turnbull held a media conference to announce some board appointments, then complained when journalists asked about other topics and walked out. Then the government backflipped and handed the Nationals a win on an effects test in competition law, which the economic hard heads in the Liberal Party oppose.

That in itself confirmed another contrary development: the Business Council of Australia is on a serious losing streak, having failed in its quest to impose a higher GST on the rest of us while slashing corporate taxes for its big business members, and now losing out on an effects test. While lower taxes might be a permanent hope of the BCA, it has fought an effects test ferociously — something that presumably is unrelated to Richard Goyder, CEO of Wesfarmers, being on the board of the BCA. The once-influential BCA is starting to look politically toxic — and Liberal powerbroker Michael Kroger’s call for CEO Jennifer Westacott to resign is looking more and more on-point.

Beyond all that, the government’s drift and indecision has carried it back to parity with Labor in the polls and dented Malcolm Turnbull’s standing with voters. There’s no one in Canberra who will tip a Labor win, currently — the expectation is the government will get back with a diminished majority. But when an opposition purposefully leads the policy debate over a confused government; Bill Shorten and Malcolm Turnbull trade places; the right is allowed to run rampant by a moderate leader; and one of the Liberal Party’s biggest business allies appears to have a reverse-Midas touch, we’re living in confusing times indeed.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

21 comments

Leave a comment

21 thoughts on “Shorten’s sweet, Mal’s a mess, as parties trade roles

  1. klewso

    Again, it’s taken Kroger and others long enough to wake up to Westacott – perhaps she has outgrown her usefulness?

  2. paddy

    [ There’s no one in Canberra who will tip a Labor win, currently —]

    LOL. Never say never. As someone said not so long ago

  3. AR

    The Evil of Two Lessers (who think that they are permanent Lessees).
    Once there was the Greens to keep hope alive but the descent of the Abominatio0n, the Black Wiggle, determined to be the Cheryl Lees/Meg Kernow du jour and destroy his party when it is needed most, we are facing a bleak future indeed.
    Kick out the Jams, Eat the Rich, everything 60s is now more urgent than ever.

  4. Angela

    Labor’s “not good with money”. True or false?

    Until Labor has a reasonable comeback for this, the Australian public will not trust them to manage the economy.

    Perception is everything.

  5. AR

    Angela – alas you are correct, “Perception is everything.“, that facts be buggered.

  6. David Hand

    The government knows exactly what it’s doing. Senate voting reform is the big issue of the week, subordinating everything else. The “government in chaos” theme is just early campaigning by Crikey for your preferred party.

    If Labor can put together a compelling case for election and persuade enough people to vote for them, good on them.

  7. tonysee

    He [Shorten] looks and sounds more natural … meantime Turnbull faced an outright rebellion by the lunatic right …

    Pretty much covers it.

    It should come as no surprise really. Shorten had to relax into the job eventually and Turnbull was nobbled by the Right last time (with a little help from some own goals).

    Maybe Shorten got to point where he thought he was on a hiding to nothing, so he may as well go for it. Having made that decision, his ‘media presence’ is not so stiff and contrived. He’s no Malcolm, but Malcolm’s gloss is wearing thin.

  8. Dog's Breakfast

    “If Labor can put together a compelling case for election…”

    Well that’s already a job done. For the first time in living memory we will be going to an election with a government with no policies, and an opposition with a fistful.

    “and persuade enough people to vote for them,”

    Well that would be relatively easy except for this;

    “Labor’s “not good with money”. True or false?

    Until Labor has a reasonable comeback for this, the Australian public will not trust them to manage the economy.”

    I won’t presume to know which side Angela sits on, but the fact that this is even debated shows that the Australian public have zero understanding of politics, economics, and basic facts.

    That is Labor’s problem.

  9. Duncan Gilbey

    “The government knows exactly what it’s doing.”

    What? Ripping itself apart?

  10. Mike Smith

    Angela:
    Labor’s “not good with money, but the LNP are far worse”. True or false?