Mar 11, 2016

How The Australian made Safe Schools a target

The campaign against the Safe Schools Coalition follows a well-established formula.

Sally Whyte — Political reporter

Sally Whyte

Political reporter

The independent review of anti-bullying program the Safe Schools Coalition is due to be handed to government today. But how did an almost two-year-old program, which was launched under the Abbott government, suddenly become a front-page "controversy" worthy of a review? The answer is Australia's national broadsheet. Almost 16,000 words were written in The Australian about the Safe Schools Coalition in the month since the newspaper "broke" the story about the anti-bullying program being taught in Australian high schools, with more weight being given to voices speaking against the program than those in support. Since February 10, the paper has published 27 articles about the program: 18 news articles, three opinion pieces, two editorials and three editions of Cut & Paste. So how does the national broadsheet go about trying to turn public opinion against a program that had existed without controversy for years? The first piece appeared on February 10, a news article by education editor Natasha Bita on the front page with "exclusive" splashed in red ink.

The Oz SSC Feb 10 1

The next day, the paper included another smaller piece by Bita, as well as an editorial, which stated "we should question why Australian children are taught an activist curriculum when their literacy and numeracy rates are alarmingly low".

The Oz SSC Feb 11 2

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

17 thoughts on “How The Australian made Safe Schools a target

  1. Norman Hanscombe

    It’s unfortunate the media refuses to discuss the collapse of standards at all levels, including that of the people entering what has become the Australian Education Industry.

  2. Wayne Robinson

    This illustrates one of the reasons I stopped subscribing to ‘the Australian’. Not only does it have agenda, but it also prosecutes them in a vicious unfair manner.

    A while back, Tim Flannery published ‘Here on Earth’ (admittedly, not one of his better books). Not only did ‘the Australian’ have an editorial attacking it (is a book really worth having an editorial?), but ‘cut and paste’ on the same day attacked Tim Flannery, part of which included a recent study suggesting that the extinction of Australian megafauna was due to climate change and not over-hunting by Australian Aborigines when they arrived here around 60,000 years ago, as proposed by Tim Flannery and expanded on in ‘the Future Eaters’.

    Part of the attack included the snide question as to whether Tim Flannery accepts climate change. And actually, over-hunting is still the accepted explanation for the extinction.

  3. Saugoof

    Really follows the pattern of their campaign against Gillian Triggs where, for a couple of weeks before she even released the Children in Detention report there was a barrage of negative articles about her.

    They would have known the message wasn’t going good so they started attacking the messenger before she delivered it, pre-emptively diverting attention.

  4. Mike Smith

    Rupert’s Thugs? Does anyone pay attention to him, or them anymore? Surely we learnt not to after 2013?

  5. Peter Darco

    The blatant bias so often shown in the Australian must reduce its readership. Who pays to read crap?

    Thus I conclude that the Australian is in terminal decline and is being used as a disposable political asset.

  6. Aethelstan

    The Australian is a propaganda sheet for the extreme right in Australia … in this mission it is ably supported, and indeed outshone by the fringe right Daily Telegraph which regularly spits out bile and hate for anything to the left of its extreme conservative prejudices …

  7. klewso

    To read them you wouldn’t think Rupert’s political pamphleteer Limited News toilet rolls had an articulated Code of Conduct policy – but they do; with 12 specific references to “Accuracy”.
    Here’s the first 8 :-
    [1 Facts must be reported impartially, accurately and with integrity.
    2 Publications should take reasonable steps to ensure reports are accurate, fair and balanced.
    3 Clear distinction must be made between fact, conjecture, comment and opinion.
    4 Try always to tell all sides of the story in any kind of dispute. Every effort must be made to contact all relevant parties.
    5 Do not knowingly withhold or suppress essential facts.
    6 Journalists should not rely on only one source. Be careful not to recycle an error from one reference source to another.
    7 Direct quotations should not be altered except to delete offensive language, protect against defamation, or to make minor changes for clarity.
    8 Headlines and captions must reflect the tone and content of the article.]
    Funny, eh? What a load of CoC?…. Should keep you laughing til Monday.

  8. Norman Hanscombe

    Had you and klewso benefited from the high quality education programmes and teachers once found in Australian Education systems Aethelstan you might have been in a better position to evaluate the relative merits of ‘news’ found among Crikey and its other capitalist enterprises. but alas that wasn’t to be.

  9. Wayne Robinson

    Sigh, Norman the Troll has returned yet again with another of his irrelevant content-free comments.

  10. Woopwoop

    Terminal decline is right Peter D – the only place you find it is in airport terminals, free.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details