
Former independent MP for New England Tony Windsor has announced he will challenge Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce for his old seat at the upcoming election.
Windsor threw his hat in the ring this morning at a press conference in Parliament House, rather than his electorate, announcing that his decision to return to politics was due to progress in New England “stalling” under Joyce, and quoted Australian of the Year David Morrison in saying it was not a standard he could walk past and accept.
Windsor retired at the 2013 election after three years as part of a hung Parliament and a minority government led by then-prime minister Julia Gillard. Windsor, as one of the independents who backed Gillard over Tony Abbott, faced a sustained campaign against him for the sin.
“‘I think you’re all aware of some of the circumstances of the hung Parliament, the vitriol that has been out there, the campaigns . . . that have been levelled at the independents in particular but the Parliament as well. That has had an impact on our family,” he said at the time.
Windsor now stands proudly by his achievements during the Gillard government, including ensuring Gonski education funding, action on climate change, and the National Broadband Network. In siding with Gillard’s NBN plans in 2010, Windsor uttered his now famous line: “Do it once, do it right, do it with fibre.” Armidale became the first town in Australia to receive the full fibre-to-the-premises service, and Windsor said he would now fight for the full NBN to be restored:
“I’m not prepared to see regional people, people in the electorate of New England, treated as second-class citizens with their education of their kids, the Gonski, with their telecommunications, that the cities will eventually get in terms of fibre to the premise because of scale, in relation to climate change, the mitigation, the drought, all of those things.”
Windsor has previously said that before the 2013 election, the Coalition had promised millions in funding for the Armidale Hospital, but this funding was withdrawn after Windsor decided not to contest. Today he said that he now expected the government to pull out all stops and suddenly go on spending sprees.
“It will come out — I’ve said to the councils and if there’s any of them watching, get your projects out, get your projects out because the debt and deficit thing has suddenly disappeared. It won’t be an issue.”
Although Windsor himself not wanting to be tarred with labels like conservative or progressive (he pointed out in his press conference that he backed the NSW Nick Greiner government), Windsor became something of a progressive hero during the Gillard government, and afterwards as he campaigned against the Shenhua mine in the Liverpool Plains. Windsor explained he was not opposed to coal mines, but said coal-seam gas mining would have a devastating impact on water resources.
As Crikey‘s Guy Rundle reported, Windsor has spent the past few years actively campaigning against the Shenhua mine. Joyce is also opposed to the mine, but Windsor has said that Joyce has done nothing, even with responsibility for water in government, to attempt to stop the mine.
On the issue of same-sex marriage, Windsor said he voted against it when it came up during the Gillard government because that was what he believed his electorate’s view to be. He said he believed that had now changed, but said he supported the plebiscite — although he has reservations about the possibility for hate speech during the campaign.
At the last election, where Windsor did not contest, Joyce received 54% of the first-preference vote. ABC election analyst Antony Green said today that although it would be competitive, it was unlikely with Joyce now in the seat, and the deputy prime ministership, that Windsor would enjoy the 60% of the vote he took when he last contested the seat in 2010.
Windsor said he had considered a Senate run, but he did not go into the reasons why he decided against it. Green said that the changing voting rules for the Senate would make it harder for Windsor to get enough statewide votes to get elected to the Senate.

18 thoughts on “Windsor returns: is it bye bye, Barnaby? Or an all-out dog fight?”
mike westerman
March 10, 2016 at 4:27 pmGreat news, and I hope people get behind him and save us from the debacle of ever having Joyce as acting PM in my lifetime. Honestly, that would push me to change citizenship!
John H
March 10, 2016 at 4:48 pmWindsor stood down before the 2013 election because he knew the New England electorate were going to vote him down. Talking to a couple of locals in 2012, they both said the locals wanted to “take to Windsor with a baseball bat” at the next election after he had betrayed them by siding with Gillard. Barnaby has nothing to worry about.
graybul
March 10, 2016 at 5:06 pmWindsor is one of the very, very few politicians I would happily vote for as Australian of the Year. But that will never eventuate, just as I no longer have any interest in Australian of the Year appointment.
AR
March 10, 2016 at 5:21 pm[email protected] – OneHand’s brother? Try to vary the Menzies House script.
BTW, when did New England start playing baseball?
Haven’t you the wit to alter the neocon (ask Onehand, he’ll explain) terminology?
This morning commercial radio’s shoutjocks have been inundated (even before Windsor’s presser!) all armed with the same cheat sheet.
Originality has never been a RWNJ strength – otherwise they’d not be rightards.
David Hand
March 10, 2016 at 6:21 pmJohn H
I must apologise for AR. I think the term “Menzies House script” represents views that middle Australia holds but releases AR from the responsibility of actually engaging with the topic under discussion.
“Neocon” terminology is also a meaningless phrase that sounds spooky but nobody really defines except to insult someone whose views they disagree with.
Ad hominem is his style
bushby jane
March 11, 2016 at 10:22 amDavid Hand, I was quoting Antony Green in the article, however I bow to your knowledge being superior to his.
Honest Johnny
March 11, 2016 at 12:02 pmJohn H @ 12, I imagine a few locals will take their “baseball bats” to Tony Windsor at the ballot box for “betraying them” but those locals probably never voted for Windsor in the first place. Lets look at the maths. Joyce got 54.2% of the primary vote at the last election without Windsor running. Windsor knows that if this can be reduced to anywhere below 45% then Joyce can lose (and that is exactly what happened to Sophie Mirabella in Indi). Mirabella’s primary vote was 44.7% and Cathy McGowan took the seat on preferences with a primary vote of 31.2%. Windsor may never get to the great heights of previous elections but he only needs to take about 9,000 votes off Joyce across the electorate and its all over!
David Hand
March 11, 2016 at 2:42 pmCome on Jane.
Green is an acknowledged expert on election systems and knows far more about it than me. He also happens to be completely supportive of the key Senate voting reform, which is to give preference selection to voters rather than preference whisperers.
Hey maybe Green thinks a candidate like Windsor has no chance because he wouldn’t get enough primary votes.