
“Codoxol: warning. Do not take codoxol if you are allergic to codoxol.”
— current TV ad
Well, I had heard of this “History” thing, never seen much of it up close. But now here it is. With the ever-forward march of Donald Trump, right before our eyes, the Republican Party is coming as close to rupture as it has in its 160-year history. He has won big, but not big enough to ace the nomination before the party convention rolls around in July.
In doing so, he has generated sufficient opposition within the party for dozens of figures to come out and say that he represents the greatest threat to the party in its history. With the rise of a #neverTrump movement, and public commitment by Republican senators and governors, the rupture has already begun. Were it to run all the way through the fabric, the party would become two. That might not occur, but it is hard to see how something extraordinary cannot occur now — a political recombination that in turn changes the character of American power in the world.
Donald Trump scored a solid win in yesterday’s Super Tuesday primaries, but it wasn’t as total as he might have hoped. His best realistic hope was a 10-1 result, with Ted Cruz taking Texas. In the end, Cruz took two other states, Oklahoma and Alaska, and Rubio took Minnesota, and ran him close in Virginia. John Kasich ran him close him Vermont. For want of a nail … Had Rubio and Kasich got the extra 3% for those last two states, Trump would have won only five of 11 states, and much of the gloss would be off. The anti-Trump forces would be further emboldened and have a legitimacy to their argument that “non-Trump” is the majority vote, and talk openly of blindsiding him at the convention.
As it was, the seven out of 11 result gave Trump the opportunity to stage a bizarre press conference/victory speech from a Florida resort, backed by half a dozen flags on gold-tipped staffs, and introduced by his new lapdog Chris Christie — “Mr Trump is the only person to restore American greatness”, “Thanks, Chris” — who then stood behind him, like a henchman or a betrayed wife. The presser was widely held to mark the appearance of a new and more presidential Trump — which was surely its point — but it included lines such as: “Well, of course I can work with the House Speaker Paul Ryan, and if he doesn’t work with me, well, he’s got a big problem.” It was hilarious, like watching a mobster who forgets he’s gone legit: “Well, uh, we will be pursuing our interests in the civil courts, and if that don’t work, well, we’ll whack ’em.”
Whatever the new style, it hasn’t reassured any in the “never Trump” movement, and last night and into the morning, all sorts of scenarios were flying around. It had become clear to many that the time for a single alternative challenger to Trump had passed; there is no single figure who could win over disparate states and deprive Trump of the big yields from the winner-take-all states from here on in. Now, the party Plan B reads: Marco Rubio takes Florida, John Kasich takes Ohio (both their home states).
That, and some other possible victories — Cruz in Missouri, Rubio or Cruz in Arizona, and the late state of California — would give the anti-Trump forces about a 15-25% edge over Trump, maybe more. They would then grit their teeth, find an alternative candidate — either Rubio or a draft-in like Paul Ryan — select him, maybe make Cruz VP, and weather the shitstorm, for a shitstorm it would be. This would be setting up to lose the election in order to save the party. After defeat, you can be sure that the party would change the rules to make sure that nothing like this ever happens again.
The reason the GOP might take this nuclear option is that Donald Trump can now no longer make good on his threat to take a third-party candidacy to the election. Some states close their ballots by mid-May — Texas among them — and about 20 states close their registration before the July party convention. The third-party threat only worked if he had lost Iowa and New Hampshire, and then jumped out immediately, created a separate organisation. He would have needed 90,000 signatures in Texas alone to get on the ballot.
You’ve got to be in place before the primaries to do this. So if Trump does not have 1237 pledged delegates by the convention, after a first ballot (after which most pledgers are released from their pledge), Trump could be squeezed out. The task of the party then becomes an anti-Hillary tirade with literally billions of dollars behind it. If Trump is excluded, every billionaire super PAC comes back on board. Should Trump prevail — a pro-Planned Parenthood, protectionist, statist candidate — the super PAC money goes away. And Trump cannot self-fund a general election campaign.
So when you game it out, there is every incentive for the GOP to do anything, anything to exclude Trump. Polling suggests that up to 20% of Republican conservative voters would not vote for Trump — offsetting any people he might bring across the divide — and that is not simply a matter of them not much liking “centrists” like John McCain. It’s a matter of them refusing to vote for someone they believe to be a fraud, a false-flag and an agent of Satan.
The GOP is already in a defensive mentality, as they were in 1996 with the hapless Bob Dole — defence of the Senate majority becomes more important than gaining the White House. The Republican nightmare is that with Trump they lose the White House and the Senate, and in 2017, Clinton gets to appoint the late Antonin Scalia’s successor to the Supreme Court. In 2018 Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter retire, and she replaces them. If she wins the lottery, Clarence Thomas dies, and a solid “living constitution” majority is installed for decades. In terms of the culture wars, that’s the ballgame.
That’s why, IMHO, Trump won’t get the nomination. Unless he wins it outright. And if he does, a whole section of the party will get behind third-party candidates, either the Libertarian or Constitutionalist Party candidates, who will already be on the ballot. Meanwhile the Democrats, with gritted teeth, will unite behind Clinton. That’s how it will go. Do not take History if you are allergic to it.

33 thoughts on “Rundle: the shitstorm cometh, now the GOP has every reason to dump Trump”
archibald
March 3, 2016 at 2:50 pmThanks Guy for the explanation on Trump’s dwindling options for a 3rd party run – I thought he was still holding that gun to their heads.
@Desmond
A situtation where one candidate has the most votes but not a majority of votes – only in a first past the post system does that person get elected. Preferential voting is set up to deal with this scenario (successful candidate may well not have the most first prefs) and any parliamentary system forming government without an absolute majority in your own right depends on forming some coalition with an absolute majority backing confidence and supply.
Look at Gillard v Abbott 2010: Coalition has the most seats but no majority in the lower house. Gillard formed an alliance with greens and independents guaranteeing supply and confidence. In this situation Tones in the lower house parallels Drumpf at the GOP convention.
rhwombat
March 3, 2016 at 2:51 pmThanks Guy, I didn’t realise just how much trouble Trumpism is causing the Repiglican Party. Are we sure that some of the super PAC billionaires won’t play nice with each other just long enough to sponsor Trump to the Presidency and complete Cheney’s project?
Venise Alstergren
March 3, 2016 at 3:12 pmGUY: You seem to assume the anti-Trump forces are impelled, by some higher source, to be decent human beings who will unite, to save Americans from a fate worse than death. Oh no you don’t my friend. They’re politicians, or had you forgotten?
Saugoof
March 3, 2016 at 3:12 pm@zut alors
They may have voted for W, but he was always just a patsy that could be easily controlled. For all his suspect qualities, the thing that Republicans fear about Trump is that he just wouldn’t listen to them.
…and wasn’t it delicious/cringe inducing watching Chris Christie shrink before our very eyes! That was the stare of someone who knows he sold his soul.
Ken Lambert
March 3, 2016 at 3:20 pmFrom the little seen of him I rather liked Kasich. Could he be a compromise candidate – a sort of Gerry Ford with a better brain.
Bob the builder
March 3, 2016 at 4:08 pmAmazing to see the naked subversion of the voters’ will – democracy is only for those who vote for the right people! (not that the nomination is a very credible form of democracy …).
Well, the Right has spent 30 years manipulating people to vote against their own interests and the result is that lots of people, right up to the top, now believe it. And you get Trump – or the even worse (if politer) alternative candidates.
Kevin Herbert
March 3, 2016 at 4:13 pmNo disrespect Guy Rundle, but this article is nothing more than navel gazing.
The next US President has already been chosen by Wall St i.e. Hilary Clinton.
There has been no democratic Presidential election process in the US since 1914.
Further, the continuing political cancer that has afflicted the US Congress’ election system since 1949, is best evidenced by the fact that in 2016, a foreign government vets who can stand for election for the vast majority of the 512 Congressional seats on offer.
Alison Weir’s excellent overview of this take-over of the US Federal political system in her “If Americans Knew’, details the events leading up to the death of US democracy.
All this MSM chatter re Dems versus GOP is window dressing, as both parties are TOTALLY controlled by Wall St.
Russia Today’s host of Crosstalk, Peter Lavelle, put it best this week when he commented that the last people to know about the impending crash of the US global empire, will be the American people….says it all really.
Electric Lardyland
March 3, 2016 at 4:32 pmWhat might be worrying the Republican fixers, is the fact that once Trump runs against a Democrat, who is likely to confront him with him well researched, effectively put and reality based arguments, then the Donald is highly likely to totally implode. That is, if we have a debate in which Clinton or Sanders quietly confront his absurd posturing, with reason or facts, then all that is going to happen, is that the overwhelming majority of Americans are going to realise what a deranged, arrogant narcissist he truly is.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, they no longer seem to have anyone capable of coherent and rational argument: so none of their nominees are able to take Trump on with this method. A quick look at some of their core beliefs should demonstrate why. Climate change isn’t real and it’s some sort of leftist, warmist, elitist plot. All those gun massacres have nothing to do with all those guns flooding the country. The invasion of Iraq was working well, until pinko Obama stuffed things up. The deregulation and lack of oversight of financial markets, will bring about a free market utopia and not a GFC: which had nothing to do with deregulation, except for that nasty deregulation that Clinton did.
I could keep going, but I’m sure you get the picture.v
browser
March 3, 2016 at 4:48 pmYes Norman. Another negative post saying basically I know more than you and nothing else. Why bother Norman. Save every one from your pomposity.
Norman Hanscombe
March 3, 2016 at 4:57 pmAnonymous browser, in common with other subscribers I know little about you because you choose to snipe from hiding, but we do know that you know little of much consequence, don’t we.
Electric Lardyland, of course you could, as you say, “keep going”, but since what you’re saying is on a par with Browswer’s waffling, why bother?
As for Bob the Builder, no matter whom you may be, you’re clearly not someone with a clue about political science.