Feb 22, 2016

What happened to all that agility? It’s starting to look ragged for Turnbull

The Turnbull government is looking ragged and reactive, and an early election is no longer the certainty it used to be.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

While the Prime Minister has so far been able to skate over destabilisation, dumb ministers and departing frontbenchers, his government is starting to look ragged, and no amount of Turnbull elan can hide it. Today's 50-50 Newspoll might be a rogue, but it's not significantly different to the 52-48 level of recent Essential and Fairfax-Ipsos polls. Opposition Leader Bill Shorten's unpopularity doesn't seem to be affecting Labor's vote substantially (remember the truth revealed by Tony Abbott: you don't have to be a popular opposition leader to win power). And clearly, Labor's negative gearing announcement has rattled the government. Despite his opponents entering the field with a controversial policy that powerful sectional interests and some media outlets have furiously attacked, Treasurer Scott Morrison had a shocker of a week. He delivered a universally panned Press Club address and then embarked on a media blitz where he was the one getting blitzed by hostile interviewers -- even shock jock Alan Jones. This is the man who is supposed to be the key economic salesman and key economic attack dog of the government, but he did more damage to himself than anyone else. And even Turnbull ended the week sounding exactly like Tony Abbott, warning that Labor would reduce the value of Australians' homes, the kind of scare campaign that Turnbull expressly said he would never engage in. It also didn't fit particularly well with Morrison's angle of attack, that Labor's policy would drive the price of new homes up because investors would pile into new homes and force low-income earners out of that market. So now the government's official line is that negative gearing will both drive prices up and down. Then came a proposed attack on compulsory super, as if the government needed more confusion and speculation on "tax reform", or what it dresses up as tax reform but which seems more about looking after Liberal donors and giving flesh to the Liberals' ideological obsessions. By successfully running its own scare campaign on the GST, and successfully portraying a five-month-old government as dithering, Labor has countered a Turnbull narrative of agile, reformist government and used the very expectations stoked by Turnbull against him. Suddenly, Labor is looking agile, innovative and reformist, while the government looks befuddled and reactive. That means an early election to capitalise on Turnbull's popularity -- more likely now, given the Greens have agreed to a deal on Senate reform -- is no longer quite the safe play, a lay-down misere, even, that we all thought it was. And the issue around the asylum seeker infant Asha directly reflects that reactivity. Asha reflects what will be an increasing problem created by the Department of Immigration's needlessly punitive detention system: many medical professionals are unlikely to be able to concur with discharging a child from their care into a deeply toxic and dangerous environment like the one we have created on Nauru. Someone within the government might have worked out that this is going to be a continuing problem while we adopt a policy that breaks minds and bodies and therefore requires taxpayer-funded treatment in Australia for its victims. So far, the only policy response from the Department is to build a bigger hospital on Nauru so injured and ill asylum seekers can be treated without any risk of them setting foot in Australia. But that's not going to help in the short term. Instead, yesterday Immigration Minister Peter Dutton belatedly said Asha would not yet be returning to Nauru, but would remain in community detention. He also said that had been the idea all along and that if only activists stopped creating trouble, it would make life easier for the government. It was a clear echo of Immigration secretary Mike Pezzullo's whine at Senate estimates that people criticising offshore processing just made it harder for the department to be compassionate. It was a dumb line from a bureaucrat, but now his minister is repeating it as a fig leaf for the government's clumsy handling of a problem it created itself.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

20 thoughts on “What happened to all that agility? It’s starting to look ragged for Turnbull

  1. The hood

    I think Turnbull should go to the election as early as possible. He needs another three years to do absolutely nothing!

  2. sang froid

    I don’t think anyone takes Shorten seriously, but Bowen is certainly setting the agenda.

  3. Keto Vodda

    It has seemed to me for some time that governments lacking in intellectual depth prefer to leave policy formation to the market place.

    And those that trust markets tend to vote Liberal.

  4. Bob's Uncle

    This is a 5 month old government? Did I miss the 2015 election?

  5. CML

    @ sang froid…what a ridiculous comment!
    Obviously 50% of the voting public now prefer a Labour government lead by Bill Shorten, and his very good team including Chris Bowen. (Seems to have escaped your notice that the Labor party led the polls for two years, with Shorten as leader before Talcum became PM).
    Thank doG for that…at last people are beginning to see through our useless PM.

    @ Bob’s Uncle…I must have missed it too! Just a media excuse for Talcum Malcum…sounds better if ‘his’ government has only had five months, rather than two years and five months, to come up with a few policies. The MSM (and Crikey on this occasion) must think we are all as dumb as they are!!

  6. Kathy McHugh

    Yes, finally voters are seeing Talcum Turnoff for what he really is, ie full of wind. He seems very gutless to take on the misfits in his own party. Even if he does manage to win the next election, he will still be held to account by the right wing nutters in his party. Talcum needs his own party, but such a situation wouldn’t allow him to be a Prime Minister

  7. Wayne Cusick


    How can the economy be agile when much of the wealthy in Australia rely on their influence over government for their wealth?


  8. Jaybuoy

    There is rumour around the house that Clownshoes is doing the numbers..can a suppository be inserted twice..sounds stonkingly messy..

  9. Jaybuoy

    The experts might be correct about first term federal Governments not being booted out…but the Australian voter now sees these morons as a second term Govt….Abbott and Hockey fubared de-luxe and now Turnbull and Morrison are on rinse and repeat. People already feel like they’ve have 2 terms worth of horribleness from this shambolic crew.

  10. Xoanon

    From my POV here in Melbourne, the Turnbull government is starting to uncannily resemble the state Coalition government of Victoria which was turfed out of power after just one term in 2014.

    It too had replaced its leader halfway through, and for all its four years looked dithering and lacking in direction, often outsourcing policy to corporate interests.

    In the end the voters weren’t out with proverbial baseball bats, just weary of an outfit that seemed to have no philosophy other than looking after its mates and holding onto power. Turnbull may go the same way.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details