Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter



Feb 18, 2016

Waiting for ScoMo -- in which no policy happens, twice

Scott Morrison spoke at length at the National Press Club yesterday, and said nothing except to distance himself from the GST and the Abbott government.



I never touch the lunch at the National Press Club addresses. Not because the food is bad, by any means, it’s just that lunch doesn’t fit my weird, mildly obsessive dietary habits, which makes lunchtime networking slightly problematic, but what are you going to do? I also never touch the wine on offer. I like wine. I love wine. Some of my best friends are wine, but no touchies before 5pm, lest I fall asleep. And I can’t drink the coffee because of the caffeine, of which I’m intolerant (yeah, I know, it’s one of the few things I’m intolerant of, right?). And the water… I can’t stand plain water. So the entire Working Press Table is laid out with stuff I won’t touch. I’m Tantalus, without the interesting culinary background.

Seated beside me is another man sent to the underworld for punishment: of all people, I’m next to Tim Shaw. Yes, that Tim Shaw, now working in Canberra, doing the breakfast shift on local station 2CC. He’s shown up for his first NPC address to hear the Treasurer, Scott Morrison, discuss “Backing Australians in our transitioning economy”.

As it turns out, it’s more a one-hander version of Waiting for Godot, the play in which, famously, nothing happens, twice.

Some speeches you know while you’re hearing them are weird, or badly misjudged, or pitched wrongly. This one’s a sleeper: it only becomes apparent over the length of the speech — and Morrison goes on and on, well over the usual time allotted for NPC addresses — and then in its aftermath that the Treasurer has said exactly nothing, about anything. It’s Tim Shaw’s “but wait, there’s more” in reverse. For hungry journalists trying to get a take-out for afternoon columns, it’s thin gruel. Morrison devotes an extended period to justifying backing away from changes to the GST. He kinda sorta suggests there’ll be spending cuts in the coming budget, but in the Q&A afterward resiles from it, saying he’s merely focused on keeping spending growth in check. He vaguely admits that the government has made no progress in two-plus years on the budget, but later rejects an invitation from Laura Tingle to explain where they went wrong on curbing the deficit.

There’s not even a by-the-numbers bagging of Labor – the usual accusation that Labor has a “tax and spend approach” only gets a brief airing, possibly because Morrison acknowledges at various moments in the speech that both spending and taxation have increased under the Coalition. And the return to surplus – once upon a time a “budget emergency” — will be, the Treasurer says, a test match, not a T20, affair, requiring “test match-like patience”.

Samuel Beckett, the only first-class cricketer ever to win the Nobel Prize for Literature, would have approved.

Morrison only shows animation when having a brief excursion into justifying the Australian Building and Construction Commission, when he fluently lies about productivity and employment in construction falling after the ABCC was abolished. Nah, Treasurer, they went up.

The second act, the Q&A, follows, and nothing happens in that, either. Journalists try to get Morrison to offer something, anything, on policy, but Morrison knocks them back, firmly declaring things like “I’m not announcing our negative gearing policy today”. It’s February 17. The budget isn’t due for nearly three months. If it continues like this it’s going to feel like three decades.

But in concentrating on why there’ll be no GST change, and why there’s been no progress on reducing the deficit, Morrison shows that the problem isn’t merely that he hasn’t got policies to announce, he’s actually got policies to disavow – and, more subtly, a government to disavow as well. His fiscal message is: all we achieved in the last two years is to stop things getting worse, we haven’t actually made any progress on the deficit. The implication Morrison isn’t willing to state openly is that Abbott and Hockey failed, so now “the first Turnbull government budget” will have to commence the process of reining in spending. And his tax reform message is that fiddling with the GST won’t deliver the kind of revenue the Coalition had hoped for, so there won’t be any substantial tax cuts.

It’s a message almost biblical in its level of inconsistency and contradiction. At one stage, Morrison blames the high level of middle-class welfare for not proceeding with the GST – too many people receiving welfare payments, you see. Those with memories longer than five minutes will remember Abbott and Hockey railing at Wayne Swan’s attempts to rein in exactly that kind of transfer payment as “class warfare” and “the politics of envy”. All that middle class welfare that Morrison now complains of was, after all, a product of the Howard government.

So the Q&A ends up being a serial effort by journalists to wrestle with smoke, although that rather overstates its entertainment value. Tim Shaw – he and I are at the end of the table, a luxury that means one is not crammed cheek by jowl with one’s colleagues – goes retail with a question on housing affordability; even on a flat deck with no movement and a well-pitched up delivery, Morrison opts to play it back down the wicket, test match style. I rise and politely inquire why the Productivity Commission hasn’t been allowed to conduct an analysis the Trans-Pacific Partnership — Morrison says during his speech that the trade agreements negotiated by Andrew Robb would lead to “generations of prosperity”  — despite asking repeatedly to do it.

“The work’s been done,” Morrison says dismissively. “The government isn’t going to manage the economy through the rear view mirror.” It’s an interesting concept — let’s call it the Morrison Doctrine: once a government has made a decision, there’s no point evaluating it to see if it actually achieves what they claim it will achieve, even if they’re continuing to make similar decisions in the future. Just drive on, pedal to the metal, and don’t look back.

Still, at least it was, finally, policy of a kind.


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

12 thoughts on “Waiting for ScoMo — in which no policy happens, twice

  1. Brian Fox

    There’s a saying where I come from that offers the following advice: “Whatever you say, say nothing.” Morrison has taken that advice to heart, the only problem being that while he is saying nothing he rabbits on and on even to the point of really pissing off Alan Jones. There is a frightening lack of connection between our increasingly surreal treasurer’s words and any possible meaning they may have. In “Death Sentence” Don Watson laments:- “Every day we are confronted with a debased, depleted sludge . . . New styles of business management have forced on us this new public language that makes no sense to outsiders, and confounds even those who use it. It is a dead language, devoid of lyric or comic possibility, incapable of emotion, complexity or nuance.” The only ones who looked more confounded than Morrison during his Press Club diatribe, were the unfortunate journalists who were obliged to attend.

  2. bushby jane

    Morrison clearly knows nothing about being a treasurer, perhaps Turnbull has set him up to fail-only possible explanation.
    Why is there such a big deal about income tax cuts (which like you say are geared to help those who are on higher salaries), I though that costello’s tax cuts are what got us into this mess in the first place.

  3. Gwen Clark

    There will be no comment on on-finance matters………

  4. mikehilliard

    An excruciatingly painful experience to watch. There was however one wonderful moment where the live coverage cut to a close up of the ceiling lights. I can only assume this was where the journos attentions were focused.

  5. Dog's Breakfast

    John Kerin is starting to look good against this guy. Joe Hockey even looks passably competent, relatively speaking only.

    @bushby jane, the ‘set up to fail’ theory is plausible, at least in that if Malcolm did do it with that intent, it was a brilliant idea.

    Give him enough rope, and Morrison is tying nooses everywhere.

  6. mike westerman

    Yes it’s hard to believe that someone of Turnbull’s supposed intelligence, arrogance and yet fear of repeating his previous failure, would not have recognised that a person of such rigid, evidence-proof mentality as ScoMo could even have possibly performed as Treasurer. In fact, either we’ve all been hoodwinked into believing Turnbull knows what he’s doing or he is the most masochistic pollie we’ve ever had, willing to risk his own future as a pollie by giving the conservatives what they asked for and showing how it fails. He can then offer the electorate his own alternative at a late year election.

  7. paddy

    Dear Bernard, you should probably go with the sniff & spit process when dealing with the press club wine.
    It might also be a worthwhile method to handle Morrison’s bland magnums of nothing.

  8. CML

    Far more dangerous than anything Scomo does, or doesn’t do, is the story of the coming Senate ‘reform’.
    According to the SMH a couple of days ago, the lunatic Greens have agreed to changes which will, in effect, reduce their numbers in the Senate by at least two, and give the Coalition outright control of the Senate for the foreseeable future. Apparently the Greens know this, but think such reform is more important!
    This analysis was reported as coming from the ‘preference whisperers’, who seem to know more about manipulation of the Senate than just about anyone else. Further, said whisperers met with DiNatale and told him this is what would happen…to no avail, apparently.
    So folks, if we get the privatisation of Medicare (the whole damn thing) and what is left of the public school system…not to mention the abolition of Fair Work Australia and the return of Work Choices, and anything else that the IPA has on its list…just remember who caused it. The closet Liberals…aka The Greens Party!!
    So now with full knowledge, those who think Talcum Malcum and DiNatale are doG’s gift to everything, can vote for the Coalition or the Greens in both houses of parliament and help in the final destruction of this once great country.
    Hope you all enjoy the resulting disaster!!!

  9. Jaybuoy

    Scott spent three years saying nothing ostensibly to prevent drownings…and here he is drowning by saying nothing..

  10. Ben.

    bushby jane – I disagree that’s the only possible explanation, as I think the more likely scenario is that Turnbull had little choice in the matter. He needed the votes ScoMo could bring to topple Tony, and giving him his desired Treasurer position was presumably the price that had to be paid.

  11. AR

    Brief & mordant BK – you have unleashed onto the world a truly terrifying concept “the Morrison Doctrine: “.
    Talcum clearly has ballot debts to pay-off, what other explanation can there be for the parade of fools, shysters and incompetents he retained or promoted..before their resignations, sackings or crash-and-burn.

  12. OnceTwiceThrice

    @mike westerman: His aptitude for being treasurer has nothing to do with it, Turnbull gave the position of treasurer to Scott Morrison in order to secure his support when they rolled Abbott.

    Unfortunately for both Turnbull and Morrison, unlike most governments they actually have to distinguish themselves from two alternatives – the Labor opposition, and the Abbott government. I can’t imagine that it will be at all easy for them to wash their hands of a government in which they both held high-ranking cabinet positions.


https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/02/18/waiting-for-scomo-in-which-no-policy-happens-twice/ == https://www.crikey.com.au/free-trial/==https://www.crikey.com.au/subscribe/

Show popup

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

Free Trial form on Pop Up

Free Trial form on Pop Up
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.