Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter


New South Wales

Feb 12, 2016


Never has the saying about a week — make that about half a week — being a long time in politics been quite as apposite as it has for New South Wales Premier Mike Baird. One minute you are Cool Dad, the next you are Casino Mike.

After an extraordinary social media backlash, Baird yesterday recanted — very, very nervously — on commercial talkback radio the breathtakingly ill-advised justification posted on his Facebook page claiming there was “hysteria” over the state’s egregious lockout laws.

Hours later he appointed former High Court justice Ian Callinan — author of racy novels and owner of a wine cellar of some note — to review the laws over the next six months.

But it wasn’t hysteria but angst, anguish, anger and general bewilderment over the laws that were applied to targeted areas, including Sydney’s storied nightlife districts Kings Cross and Oxford Street on the back of a couple of deaths.

The lockout has caused long-time businesses, such as Hugo’s Pizza Bar and Lounge in King Cross along with dozens of others, to collapse, and the Cross as well as Sydney’s gay nightlife — the heart and soul of the inner east — has been all but wiped from the cultural map. Punters have been forced out into suburbs like Newtown.

Yet some inner-city entertainment precincts are more equal than others — specifically Sydney’s Star City Casino, the premier venue in the misery industry that blights Australia and fills state government coffers in ways it does few other “developed” nations.

Freshly revamped (yawn, again) with more upmarket nosheries and its owns bars and clubs, the precinct is closer to the city than Kings Cross, and it is exempt.

The new casino at Barangaroo, which Baird’s predecessor Barry O’Farrell handed on a sliver platter to James Packer without a competitive tender process, is set to operate under the same no-lockout provisions. Star City’s annual results released in August last year show a whopping 25% profit increase. Win-win for shareholders, executives and the government

Why are the casinos and their attendant tenants subject to different rules to other business in the same business? Money, of course, and the power and influence that goes with it.

Gambling corporations in Australia are generally monopoly players; there is one casino in each of the state and territory capitals (Canberra being the exception — it doesn’t need the money, of course). So run properly they have fat, monopoly profits, which they split with lazy state governments. What better idea than to lock punters out of traditional entertainment venues and force them into venues where the government is getting a bigger cut?

What is perhaps most bewildering is that the lockout laws are a tacit admission that policing, community program and education in New South Wales fall so far short that Sydney needs such laws. In Melbourne — and as a long-time Sydneysider it irks me to have to say this — for many years now a far more inviting city to step out in, a similar program was tried and abandoned after a few months.

The police in all other state capitals are more than capable of separating the tiny number of troublemakers from the vast majority of peaceful visitors. Why not in Sydney?

The web of influence wielded by a vast network of highly paid former Liberal staffers on behalf of their casino bosses (yes, there is also one of Labor Party staffer, but that’s not the issues here and, in any case, after a few years they start to blend).

The casino companies pay big money to former staffers and hand them chunky expense accounts to talk their former colleagues and newer members of the network, many of whom will be looking to snag jobs in the same corporate networks. And so the money goes around.

Liberal president Chris Downy was appointed to a plum role at Star City just as its lovely set of numbers was released. A former minister, he headed the Australian Casino Association, whose president was a Crown executive, before quitting for three years with the Libs, during which time Crown was handed Barangaroo.

In December 2013 Rod Bruce, chief of staff to former deputy NSW premier Andrew Stoner, joined Star City’s owner, Echo Entertainment.

So pervasive has the nexus between the NSW Libs and big business in the state become that it has created its own faction, branded the “concierge faction” by none other than Fairfax’s right-wing firebrand Paul Sheehan describing a system where people become political staffers as a stepping stone to well-paid corporate lobbying gigs (sometimes called public relations, communications, etc).

Up until the un-ignorable events of this week, Sydney’s often compliant media, including the usually more critical Sydney Morning Herald, seemed determined to ignore it.

Ahead of Baird’s statement, one business owner was prepared to stand up and be counted, Matt Barrie, millionaire founder of online jobs site Freelancer.com, delivered a searing, lengthy disquisition on the lockout laws titled “Would the last person leaving Sydney please turn the lights out?“. Barrie wrote:

“The total and utter destruction of Sydney’s nightlife is almost complete.

“A succession of incompetent governments has systematically dismantled the entire night time economy through a constant barrage of rules, regulation and social tinkering.

“And oh, how ridiculous these rules have become in Sydney. A special little person has decided that there is a certain time at night when we are all allowed to go out, and there is a certain time that we are allowed into an establishment and a certain time that we are all supposed to be tucked into bed.”

The sustained reaction from voters to Baird’s comments has also demonstrated just how out of touch the Premier’s office has become.

The ham-fisted attempts by his staff to remove comments from his Facebook page only amplified his problem and again demonstrated no real understanding of how social media works.

More importantly, he should also now know that scrutiny of the NSW Liberal Party’s links with business, the root cause of the problem, will intensify.

There’s some serious housecleaning that needs be done at NSW Liberal Party HQ; it’s starting to get the same whiff that the NSW Labor Right had before its slow-motion implosion. But the problem with Baird and O’Farrell — in the main nice, decent fellas — is that they grew up in the NSW Liberal Party system. So did Arthur Sinodinos. It nurtured and rewarded them, so why would they think there is anything intrinsically wrong with it?

Does Baird have the capacity to see how rotten his party has become, and does he have the backbone and political will to clean it up, or, like former premier Bob Carr, will he skip off into the sunset and leave the mess to fester?



We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

25 thoughts on “Cui bono? The curious case of the grim industry that thrives on the lockout laws

  1. Norman Hanscombe

    This article is an excellent example of the sorts of Hysteria Baird mentioned, isn’t it.

  2. John Newton

    Housekeeping. Won’t work. Putting Lab back. won’t work. Corruption and sleazy dealsa are endemic in NSW.

  3. Eric Vigo

    “The lockout laws have killed Sydney — and they might kill Mike Baird’s political career.”

    Really? I doubt it. A lot of people think this has been done to reduce crime and coward punches. So, that’s that in most people’s minds.

    Like most pollies, if I were Mike Baird, I’d do that swipe movement with the hand, while going “if it EVER moves up into the orange zone, we have X and Y strategy and it will usually work.”

    With that, they close the subject and go back to talking about how their mates in the casinos are doing great ….

    It’s only activists who think things are worse for them then they already are.

  4. paddy

    Marvelous piece Michael.
    We can only hope that the nonsense in Sydney has finally reached the tipping point.
    Not holding my breath, but still hoping.

  5. jmendelssohn

    As a long time resident of Sydney’s inner west, my only objection to the lock-out laws is that they have diverted drunken early morning hoons to Newtown. Grossing out in the street and punching random strangers may happen at Munich during Oktoberfest but for the most part the great cities of the world are either fairly quiet or moderately civilized in the wee small hours. London after 2 am is hardly the place to find the chundering louts that used to characterize the area around Sydney’s CBD.
    It would however be an improvement to extend those CBD drinking rules to the rest of Sydney (including the casino).

  6. Eric Vigo

    “As a long time resident of Sydney’s inner west, my only objection to the lock-out laws is that they have diverted drunken early morning hoons to Newtown.”

    If they didn’t come to Newtown, would you care?

  7. a commentator from earth

    Article says “there is one casino in each of the state and territory capitals (Canberra being the exception”

    Admittedly it was pretty dull when I last went there some years ago, but there is a casino in Canberra.

  8. jmendelssohn

    Hey Eric, I thought I made it pretty clear that – until and unless late night drinkers learn how to behave in public – the drinking restrictions should go state wide, including the Casinos.

  9. Scott Grant

    I think there are greater issues of egregious overreach in things like bicycle laws and the shotgun mergers of councils. But these don’t have the liquor industry funding a PR campaign and astro-turfing.

  10. Dan M

    The issue seems to be a lightning rod for the general malaise on the adult population in Sydney. A lot of people are tired of the mass infantilising going on, adults telling others how to behave and what’s acceptable (@jmendelssohn) for instance. The hypocrisy of it all being the ‘doctors, nurses, emergency room staff’ line constantly trotted out. It’s great their opinion for some reason trumps all others on this issue, but when the same doctors call for pill testing at festivals and other measures they are ignored or sidelined. Years ago they were the bulwark for getting rid of smoking indoors, but guess what? Smoking indoors will be legal at Barangaroo.

  11. jmendelssohn

    It is not promoting “mass infantalising” to notice that it has long been both more pleasant and safer to walk (after midnight) from Bleeker street to 46th street in New York, than to be in George or William street in Sydney at the same time. The problem is not alcohol as such, but the way that too many (mainly) Australian men choose to use drunkenness as an excuse for grossing out.

  12. AR

    Does nobody in government have any sense of history? The chief argument against the Six o’clock Swill was that men would line up their schooners before time-up then down them as quickly as possible. With the obvious results when they got out onto the streets and worse when they got home, bellies full and pockets empty to a cowering family.
    Just out of interest, imagine half of these violent shits stoned instead. Think of the violence & havoc that would cause.

  13. Lubo Gregor

    How many is too many and why the only answer we have is to punish the law-abiding well behaved majority?

  14. Norman Hanscombe

    Don’t discount the importance, jmendelssohn, of how our P.C. Chattering Classes have managed to disrupt the use of sane Laws to reduce these problems.
    Anonymous AR, if you understood what actually was occurring at the time of the 6 o’clock swill Laws, you just might begin to understand how erroneous your ‘interpretations are.
    Dan M, should you ever be so fortunate to understand these issues half as well as jmendelssohn does, your opinions will be more than twice as relevant as is currently the case; but we shouldn’t hold our breath, should we.

  15. David Hand

    Baird made a PR cock up with his posturing but unfortunately for those of us who enjoy going out, the influence on Baird is not so much the casinos but middle aged people who last visited Kings Cross at around 9pm in the evening in 1992 and who now sit at home watching “The Biggest Loser” and being scared to death by lurid reports on Today Tonight. These people vote. Patrons of bars in the Cross tend not to.

    I was in a bar with a colleague in Kings Cross a few months ago at around 9pm on a Wednesday night. We ordered a bottle of wine and two glasses. The bar was not allowed to let us have the bottle on our table but kept it behind the bar because they were an “at risk” venue. This was a surprise as we were the only customers in the bar at the time. It didn’t turn out too badly because in the 45 minutes we were there, not a single other customer came in so the bar staff had the time to personally refresh our glasses.

    None of the coward punches that generated such hysteria occurred after midnight and they still happen today in other suburbs.

    But the Cross is dead now. The nimby set whose property values are increasing due to the gentrification of the Cross will make sure of that.

  16. mikehilliard

    Baird has lobotomised Sydney’s night life, the youth hate him. If he touches Newtown then we’ll all know for certain he’s backing the casino crap in Darling Harbour (location of toilet gang rapists) and see a really big outcry.

    For anyone who ever went out late in the Cross there was always the risk of trouble, not that you thought about it much till the MSM made it a daily issue. That was part of it’s “edge”, that is what made it what it was.

  17. Dan M

    Prize winning troll Norm Handscombe; please don’t hold your breath, you’re probably down to your last few. I’m finding yours and old mate jmendolsshons’ logic hard to follow when it sounds like a passage from a PG Wodehouse story

  18. Eric Vigo

    jmendelssohn – yes, I missed your last sentence, a rushed day for thought today.
    And I agree with you about alcohol and anglo-Aussies, but the problem is if you extend lock out laws to the whole of the state, its not going to happen unless the property development lobby from West Wyalong will push for it.
    Although it will probably happen due to a lot of the NSW Libs being nutso Christians. It’s just that global workers wont go to Bourke or Young, so there wont be a stink about it there.

    David Hand – you’ve hit it on the head. It’s property development. Whoever they want next, will get lock out laws.

    mikehilliard – Baird couldnt give a STUFF about the youth. It’s all sewn up with freaked out low-intelligence people all thinking he’s their saviour. ALLLLLL SORTED!!1!!!11!!!. Once they are running the country in 20 years, he’ll be out of there with great coy dir jobs and lots of time to w*nk erm, pray! at Hillsongs all day long for our Lord.

  19. Norman Hanscombe

    mikehilliard, my personal experiences of Kings Cross go back only as far as the early 1940s when it was a safe place, but family members and friends spoke of much earlier times than that when they felt quite safe. Even the notorious Razor Gang members weren’t deemed a threat to people other than those in their own circles.
    Anonymous Dan M, it’s not surprising that someone with your problems with basic literacy struggles distinguishing between the real world and a story by P.G. Wodehouse, is it.

  20. old greybeard

    A few of the fools on this list should go work in the emergency departments where the real world is as opposed to your fantasies. Unless the media is underreporting deaths, there have not been many. The grog houses of course failed to show their duty by serving drunks and this is the result. As for dope, if you mean marijuana, bulldust. Does not produce the violence. Take it from an old musician. We could slam every loudmouth drunk in the tank for the night, but that would be sooo unfair and would bring more moaning about the nanny state. It is you right to be a drunken arse and annoy everyone isn’t it? So what’s the solution to it? How many lives? What is better and will work?

  21. Bob the builder

    What is it about the NSW political elite?

    Liberal or Labor, they’ve got their snouts in the trough …

  22. AR

    oldGreyB – my final comment was litotes.
    The main cause of the insane violence – as distinct from common-or-garden drunken fights – is that the coward punchers are usually full of steroids, meth & alcohol, a truly unholy trinity.

  23. Norman Hanscombe

    Eric Vigo, it must irk people such as you who deem yourselves superior to the Australian Citizens you derided in your Post that they decline to vote the way you want them to.
    It’s far easier for your ilk to launch distracting attacks on Christians (and do so in quite poor quality language) than to actually present a coherent case.
    You can of course tale some comfort in the fact that the Crikey Commissariat Censorship Team obviously approves of your “thinking”, can’t you.

  24. Dan M

    Thanks Norm. I should feel insulted, but cutting through the sludge of passive phrasing and dangling modifiers you spew out made me feel sorry for you, and that doth butter no parsnips.

  25. Norman Hanscombe

    Don’t you worry about that anonymous Dan M, because I’ve grown accustomed to not making people happy. I still regret though the sadness I caused others when I was given positions ahead of better qualified people in such jobs as Commonwealth Scholarship Guidance Officer at Sydney University. What made it worse for a sensitive person such as myself was the fact I was unaware the position existed until I was told to apply. The Senior Officer told me later that he merely popped in to say hullo at the Selection Interview out of politeness, because on the recommendation of Sydney University academics it was clear I was the best candidate.
    That sort of head hunting frequently placed me in the embarrassing position of causing unhappiness to those who had applied for the job; but if you’ve been in similar situations yourself you’d understand, and not feel the need to fall back on pretentious mangled metaphors.
    Try to have a good day, won’t you.


Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.