On the national anthem
Jock Webb writes: Re. “Tips and rumours: a very confused Australia Day” (yesterday). George Christensen would appear to be a nong and a drongo. I sang the old version of Advance Australia Where in primary school in the early sixties. The second verse then was:
“When gallant Cook from Albion sailed,
To trace wide oceans o’er,
True British courage bore him on,
Til he landed on our shore.
Then here he raised Old England’s flag,
The standard of the brave;
With all her faults we love her still;
Brittania Rules the Waves.
In joyful strains then let us sing
Advance Australia fair.”
Our current second verse was the third. A quick look will show that the now second verse was included upon Federation, so it has been there as long as Australia has. Then again he is a Queenslander, and their loyalty is always suspect. It does show what a nation of hypocrites we have become and what a garbage anthem it is. Unsingable in the most commonly used key and the words are pap. Away with it. I Am Australian or the 2000 version of My Island Home knock it into the weeds. The Christensen Version comes from the last (fourth) verse and clearly warns about foes which refugees are not. By this goose’s standards God Save the Queen should state “May he sedition hush and like a torrent rush, rebellious Scots to crush, Great George is King”. Where do they get them?
On a republic
Adrian Jackson writes: Re. “Crikey says: time to grow some republican balls” (yesterday). The PM is sensible in saying he does not want to lead a campaign on a republic as the previous vote he led was soundly defeated by Australians. 13 million Australians voted and 1 million more supported the status quo with a majority in every state (and the NT) supported the “no” vote in 1999. Only the ACT supported the Yes campaign of the elitist and celebrities. As far as the premiers support is concerning they will be out of parliament in 10 years, if not sooner, and the name of this years Australian of the Year will be a distant memory. Can anyone name an Australia of the Year from recent years off the top of their head, other than Rosie Batty?
9 thoughts on “Let’s get real about the republican movement”
Norman Hanscombe
January 28, 2016 at 1:49 pmThe day the Republic Movement Leadership “gets real” about actually trying to convince enough voters we should make that change seems further away now than it did in the 1940s, doesn’t it.
wayne robinson
January 28, 2016 at 1:52 pmAdrian,
What worries me is that I can’t remember the name of this year’s Australian of the Year, hopefully due to a lack of interest (although I’ve reached an age at which I can no longer develop early onset dementia – any dementia would be right on schedule).
Ben.
January 28, 2016 at 4:40 pm“Can anyone name an Australia of the Year from recent years off the top of their head, other than Rosie Batty?”
Adam Goodes. I think he and Rosie have done more with the title and opportunity than many others, even if it ended with yobbos In the media attacking them both. Morrison’s not a bad choice, but I misread an article earlier in the day and thought Catherine McGregor had been picked, so he (probably unfairly) feels like a safe choice to me.
Michael Zarb
January 28, 2016 at 5:15 pmAustralians didn’t reject becoming a republic. They rejected becoming a republic under the model put forth by our monarchist PM.
Norman Hanscombe
January 28, 2016 at 5:21 pmMichael Zarb, before posting such nonsense why not do some careful research and you’ll find Howard AND the Constitutional Monarchists had NOTHING to do with the hopeless Proposal the inept Republican groups presented for the Referendum.
Should you be willing to debate this at a Public Meeting, make my day by letting me know.
AR
January 28, 2016 at 5:51 pmJockW – re “Where do they get them?”, I wonder “WHY?!”.
drsmithy
January 29, 2016 at 9:53 amShould you be willing to debate this at a Public Meeting, make my day by letting me know.
Hard to get more public than the internet !
Norman Hanscombe
January 29, 2016 at 10:27 amAs has been pointed out many times on this site, there are important significant differences between a meeting held in a hall with questioners there, and a website where anonymous cowards can post a flood of distracting irrelevant garbage; but if you don’t understand that stay happy, won’t you drsmithy et al.
drsmithy
January 29, 2016 at 3:10 pmI have to thank you, Norman. You complaining about people posting “a flood of distracting irrelevant garbage” gave me the best belly laugh I’ve had for ages.
Reminded me of that other article about Murdoch complaining about people not paying taxes, in a way…