Jan 28, 2016

Age newsroom revolt ends Latham column before it begins

Mark Latham's would-be column for The Age in Melbourne seems to have crashed and burned before take-off.

Myriam Robin — Media Reporter

Myriam Robin

Media Reporter

Mark Latham's new gig as a columnist at The Age is over before it even began, with news filtering out to Age journos on Thursday that the column would not be going ahead. The idea was first aired in Monday's Media Diary column in The Australian, to the startled dismay of many Fairfax journalists, who have been up in arms about it ever since. Crikey understands that all week, Age editor-in-chief Andrew Holden has been approached by journalists within the newsroom, including some very senior figures, who argued against the column. Latham, for those living under a rock, used to be a well-read and longstanding columnist with Age stablemate The Australian Financial Review, until BuzzFeed revealed in August that a Twitter account linked to his personal email address had been abusing then-Australian of the Year Rosie Batty. It followed persistent and growing concerns about the subject matter and style of Latham's writings; the former Labor leader had turned his attention away from Labor and its faceless men to focus his attacks on "left feminism", which he described as "akin to a psychoneurotic disorder". He was, in fact, sued for defamation by Lisa Pryor, a columnist with Good Weekend, which runs in The Age, after he used his AFR column to criticise her in highly personal terms. Latham's reputation may have been damaged, but his career hasn't been. He picked up a gig last year as a regular panelist on Channel Nine's The Verdict (which was renewed for this year), and last week, was given his own show on Triple M. His new Age column would have signalled a significant career comeback, but it was a step too far for The Age newsroom. Crikey understand the idea of employing Latham as a columnist originated in the commentary desk, but was approved by Holden. When it was reported in the Oz, parts of the newsroom requested and got a meeting with Holden to discuss the column. It's understood in the meeting, Holden initially defended Latham's writing and the questions it raises, but he later bowed to the opinion of his journalists. Nothing formal was ever announced to the newsroom, with the campaign against the column largely going on behind the scenes. Crikey is uncertain whether or not a formal contract between Latham and The Age had ever been signed. But some facts about the column have filtered out. It's understood the column, the first edition of which would have run this coming Monday, would have run only in The Age, and would not even have appeared on the website of The Sydney Morning Herald. Age journalists have speculated that's because SMH editor Darren Goodsir wanted little to do with it. On social media, many Fairfax journalists, particularly those at the SMH or in Canberra, were dismissive of the column. Behind the scenes, so were many Age journalists, some of whom questioned Latham's relevance to Melbourne readers. "It's proof The Age's website is going downmarket for hits," one told Crikey, questioning why the newspaper would hire someone whose columns had caused Fairfax so much controversy. According to the AFR, Latham's decision to leave the Fin was entirely his own. AFR editor-in-chief Michael Stutchbury sang his praises on the way out, describing Latham as a "provocative and highly readable columnist".

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions



Leave a comment

13 thoughts on “Age newsroom revolt ends Latham column before it begins

  1. Alison George

    @wo ei nee 29 January 2016 at 3:46 pm –

    your valid presentation higlights the illusionary distortion of the senses in which we live. And we all think it’s normal.

    @john Newton 29 January 2016 at 6:28 pm

    (1. Just imagine Mitchell Pearce were Mildred Pearce, and had done the same things.)

    She probably would have got fan mail and letters of support from males and condemnation from females. I don’t think this would support your argument.

    (2. If one man a week was killed by his wife as is happening now the other way around, do you reckon there might be a bit of an outcry)

    Yes, but there should be equal outcry for any person being killed whether they are male or female. You under-play the seriousness of this by making it a gender issue and ignoring social and economic pressures that are root cause.

  2. MAC TEZ

    Kevin H. and the other “promasculinist” loony Latham fans ought to head to Sydney this weekend to catch up with good old Daryush Valizadeh (if he gets through customs), “Roosh”‘s Return of Kings group may be the boys club the hard done by fellas are craving and he could also be the kind of guy that appeals to Ali G. above.

  3. Kevin Herbert

    MAC TEZ; just like AR above, clearly very poor analysis on your part.

    Show me where I said I supported Latham or his views.

    An apology will do…no grovelling expected.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details