Can a press release really be on background?
The staff of a prominent Australian politician this morning sent around a rather anodyne press release about Australia Day. But what raised eyebrows in the Crikey
bunker was the very top line, which contained a brief and not very important line given to journalists "on background".
Background briefings can help make the work of journalists more informed and help steer them clear of obvious errors. But information given "on background" can also be a way to avoid accountability, with a journalist left to stake his or her reputation on the truthfulness of a claim without being able to be transparent about its source. A press release given on background is highly unusual -- and not very helpful. -- Myriam Robin
Rear Window scribe to Oz.
Only a few weeks back News Corp was making journalists redundant, but there's still money in the chest for battling Fairfax. The Australian
has conducted yet another raid on Fairfax's business section, luring across Rear Window writer Will Glasgow (courtesy of a rather hefty pay packet) to write "a new business column", according to Saturday's paper. Crikey
understands the Oz
has been trying to lure him over for some time, with negotiations started under former editor-in-chief Chris Mitchell (unlike his partner-in-crime Joe Aston, Glasgow managed to maintain a good relationship with Mitchell -- while Aston was ripping Mitchell a new one late last year Glasgow got a nice little exclusive from Mitchell
about the outgoing editor's book contracts).
Glasgow's only the latest in a string of poachings
, which seem to have kicked off ever since The Australian
hired Eric Johnston a year and a half ago. The paper is keen
to take on the supremacy of the Australian Financial Review
for business readers, a plan that seems to be kicking along under new editor-in-chief Paul Whittaker. Mind you, the Oz
still hasn't managed to lure over Gold Walkley winner Adele Ferguson, despite trying
. And Aston is still at the Fin
. Which is unsurprising, judging by the staggering failure of the last set of negotiations
. -- Myriam Robin
Latham to The Age?
Mere months after its spectacular implosion, Mark Latham's career seems to be blooming. First came a Triple M podcast, and, if The Australian
is to be believed, he's shortly to be signed up as a new columnist for The Age.
The paper's editor wasn't saying much this morning, so we'll have to wait and see on that one.
Ross v The ABC (part 3).
Over the weekend, New Matilda
uploaded the transcript
of the now-infamous meeting between former ABC tech editor Nick Ross and ABC current affairs head Bruce Belsham.
Meanwhile, to our piece on Friday
that suggested the meeting didn't provide proof for one of Ross' central claims (that he was gagged on writing on the NBN by the ABC), New Matilda
editor Chris Graham responded thusly
"A story filed by Crikey argues that what New Matilda has published so far does not substantiate the claims by Nick Ross that he was gagged. While we respectfully disagree, that story wasn’t intended to prove Ross was gagged. It was intended to reveal the conduct of Belsham."
Much of Graham's piece looked at how other outlets hadn't picked up the story (as well as expanding on New Matilda's
reasons for revealing the existence of the tape despite the legal risks). But as of this morning some have touched it, in their own way. In the Oz,
Chris Kenny asked why the ABC didn't rein in all its other journalists the same way it had done Ross:
"Despite his campaign against the ABC, the insight we get from Ross’s experience is not concern that his superiors attempted to exert some sort of editorial direction and restraint. On the contrary, it tends to raise questions about why such editorial oversight is notably absent in so many other contentious areas.
"If it was wrong for Ross to use the ABC for his campaign, where are the ABC editorial leaders restraining ABC journalists who campaign for a carbon price or on climate alarmism? Where are the interventions to constrain journalists campaigning against offshore processing or in favour of gay marriage? And who, pray tell, is counselling ABC presenters about protesting the felling of trees?"