Jan 22, 2016

Ex-ABC journo sticks by ‘gag’ claim, though illegal recording sheds little light on saga

Did the ABC 'gag' its tech journo from writing about the NBN in order to keep Malcolm Turnbull onside? The journo sticks to his guns, but a recording of his conversations with editors is unclear.

Myriam Robin — Media Reporter

Myriam Robin

Media Reporter

A covert recording of a meeting between former ABC technology editor Nick Ross and ABC head of current affairs Bruce Belsham proves the ABC exec wanted Ross to write a piece, or several pieces, examining problems with Labor's NBN policy. But the recording, excerpts of which were published last night in New Matilda, doesn't appear to prove Ross' claims that the ABC gagged him to keep incoming communications minister Malcolm Turnbull happy. Ross left the ABC last week, accepting a redundancy three years after he abruptly ceased writing on the NBN for the national broadcaster. Ross' silence followed a Media Watch episode that concluded his writing was veering close to advocacy for Labor's NBN, and a piece in The Australian that (incorrectly) said Ross had been "disciplined" by the ABC after he wrote an 11,000-word opus that savaged the Coalition's NBN plan. Last week, Ross explosively said he had been gagged from writing on the issue because the ABC wanted to keep the Coalition onside. Last week, Ross told Crikey:
"I got told at the time by senior ABC management that [the ABC] was preparing for the Liberals to win the next election and didn’t want to piss them off, particularly with Malcolm Turnbull being in charge of the ABC."
The allegation is not backed up by the quotes produced from the recorded tape with Belsham. While New Matilda has not published the transcript of the entire recording, which in itself only details one of Ross' numerous interactions with managers, Crikey understands the full recording does not include Belsham making a comment on keeping Turnbull happy. The recording is largely concerned with mapping out a potential article examining the faults in Labor's NBN. The parts of the recording published by New Matilda appear to show Belsham asking Ross to give him something he can then take to his own managers to justify Ross' continued writing. “We’ve got to give you some kind of insurance policy, you know," Belsham says in the recording, according to New Matilda. "An insurance policy is an article where you are hard-headed about something to do with [Labor’s] NBN failings, or, you know, potential failings. One of the quite basic failures is it’s not going to happen.” “I like the [latest] piece, and I would like to publish it. But I’m just saying, before I can let you do that, so I don’t have screams from the 14th floor … we need to give ourselves [some insurance] and say ‘Look, this guy is prepared to be critical of some aspects of [Labor’s plan], he’s written this tough article about X.'" The 14th floor refers to the floor at ABC Ultimo that houses managing director and editor-in-chief Mark Scott, the ABC board, and the ABC's corporate affairs team. Crikey pointed out to Ross this morning that the Belsham quotes in New Matilda's piece did not support his claim that the ABC gagged him in order to keep Turnbull onside. Ross responded that the ABC had made a point about the politics at an earlier meeting, and that this was what prompted him to record a meeting with Belsham. "On March 8 2013 I was told by [Bruce Belsham that] ABC management ... were preparing for the Liberals to win the next election and didn't want to piss them off, particularly with Malcolm Turnbull being in charge of the ABC. I made a note of this when I left and decided to record future meetings because I didn't want to get caught up in a conspiracy like that without protecting myself," Ross told Crikey. The ABC last week said the only advice Ross had received about his writing was in reference to its editorial policies. The New Matilda piece also does not explicitly support the claim that Ross was "gagged". Belsham appears willing to publish further pieces by Ross on the NBN, provided Ross also writes pieces about Labor. But New Matilda editor and owner Chris Graham argues that "there are a thousand ways to gag a journalist", and that requiring Ross to write articles critical of Labor's NBN was an effective one in this situation. He notes Ross was also prevented from responding to media inquiries and the false claim that he'd been formally disciplined by the ABC. "He was gagged on that, and he's fucking angry about it." The issue of the recording has drawn some comment among journalists on social media. The New South Wales Surveillance Devices Act holds it illegal to record a person in the state without their permission. "We’ve broken the law -- we know we have," Graham told Crikey. "Our detailed legal advice is to throw ourselves at the mercy of the court. The fact is New South Wales doesn't have a public interest defence in this for journalists or anybody else. So be it." New Matilda says it intends to publish the full transcript of Ross' meeting with Belsham before Sunday. The ABC declined to comment beyond its statement to New Matilda, which slammed the website for not giving the ABC the full context of the Belsham quotes it was asked to respond to. The ABC added that Ross' "exchanges [with Belsham] used unguarded and informal language, as is commonplace in private conversations that are intended to air issues fully, frankly, robustly and in confidence". "It would be a shame if all such conversations had to be conducted as if they were on the record interviews. Nevertheless, the thrust of the sentiments expressed to Mr Ross in all of the discussions held with him were consistently that, as with all other topics, coverage of the NBN issue required adherence to the ABC charter and editorial policies, which require appropriately reflecting all major points of view."

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

21 thoughts on “Ex-ABC journo sticks by ‘gag’ claim, though illegal recording sheds little light on saga

  1. Lee Tinson

    While there may not be evidence of actual gagging at that point, it’s clear to me that there would have been, either by Belsham or by the board.

    And there had, in fact, been some gagging because the article was delayed until after the election. Also, of course, the australian published content that they should have known was false and then denied Ross a right of reply (now THAT’s what I call gagging).

    We love our ABC, Miriam, as you do. But they screwed up badly on this one. This is evidence of at least lack of courage at board level and improper behaviour towards employees by management.

  2. David Hand

    This is a classic example of a left wing activist being asked to show some balance in his supposed expertise as a columnist on the NBN and demonstrating complete and irreversible bias.

    I’m not surprised the ABC shut him up. But it’s not about keeping Turnbull happy, as if they would fall into that trap with Tony Abbott as the incoming PM. Nope, in this case, even the ABC could see bias in it’s activist reporting.

  3. Limited News

    Agree with Tinson.

    “activist reporting”? What do you think Four Corners did with stories on underpayment of foreign workers, greyhound baiting and slaughter-house cruelty in Indonesia? Maybe the ABC should close down Four Corners so David Hand doesn’t have to put up with discomforting facts?

  4. The Cleaning Lady

    Requiring Ross to criticise the Labor plan is not the same as requiring articles to reflect all major points of view.

    Just saying.

  5. David Hand

    You make a good point Limited apart from the discomforting fact that there aren’t actually any facts in this article, just a conspiracy theory by an NBN activist that the ABC gagged him to please Turnbull.

  6. AR

    Criticism is not, and need not, be bias.

  7. Jack Robertson


  8. Jack Robertson

    So sorry, but I just couldn’t help it. Oh dear me.

    Professional journalists whine about being secretly recorded and their quotes taken out of context. Ho ho ho ho effing ho.

    Welcome to the new communications paradigm, morons. You lot just don’t get to lay down the media rules any more. Get used to it.

  9. zut alors

    The lack of hard evidence does not prove something never happened.

  10. AR

    Sometimes that damned dog just will not bark.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details