Jan 11, 2016

Poll Bludger: and the next federal election will be held on …

Myriad factors influence when Malcolm Turnbull will decide the date for the next election.

William Bowe — Editor of The Poll Bludger

William Bowe

Editor of The Poll Bludger

As the wheel of federal politics begins to turn again after the interruption of the festive season, all calculations for the year ahead are hostage to one overriding question: when and how Malcolm Turnbull will place his prime ministership before the verdict of the voters. Broadly speaking, two options are available in calling an election that could, in theory, be delayed as late as January 14 next year, but will assuredly be held much sooner. The first is to go early with a double dissolution, for which triggers are available in the form of twice-rejected bills to abolish the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, and to impose greater oversight on union officials. While the latter issue has potential as a means of attacking Labor over union corruption, the real attraction of the double dissolution option comes down to election timing. The earliest possible date for a vanilla-flavoured election for the House of Representatives and half the Senate is August 6, since the election to replace the senators elected in 2010 cannot be called until the final year of a term that runs to mid-2017. Given the extremely difficult budget the government will have to bring down in May, the Liberals have good cause to fear that much of Turnbull's current gloss will have worn off by then. Turnbull also has the fractious state of his party to think about, and could well feel that he has the opportunity to marginalise his internal critics if he gets in quick with a decisive win over Labor while his stocks are still at their height. The optimal time for such an election would be in early or mid-March, given the interruption of Easter holidays later that month, and the need for breathing space between the election and the budget session of Parliament. So if Turnbull indeed has a double dissolution in mind, we should know about it fairly soon. However, there are two reasons to doubt that things are headed in that direction. First, senators elected at a double dissolution would have the start of their terms backdated all the way to the middle of last year, so that Turnbull would effectively be committing himself to a further election of one kind or another barely more than two years later. The second issue relates to the still-unreformed Senate electoral system, which could hardly fail to return a bumper crop of micro-party chancers under the lower quota for election that applies at a double dissolution. It is well and truly too late now to reform the system in time for an election held before the May budget. The government's relaxed approach suggests either that it has no real intention of changing the system in the short term, or that it will play its hand as late in the game as it can get away with, so as to avoid alienating the crossbench any earlier than necessary. The latter possibility presumes that Turnbull will exercise the second of the two options available to him: a normal election in the second half of the year. While such an election could in theory be held in early August, conventional wisdom holds that voters can be caught in a happier mood at an election held between September and March. Further obstacles to election timing loom in late September and early October, with school holidays to be in swing everywhere other than South Australia and the Northern Territory by September 24. The weekend that follows is particularly off-limits, since it coincides with the AFL and NRL grand finals. The government will, in any case, have passed its third year anniversary by that time, and hanging on too long beyond that is generally held to be poor form. The case for September is further strengthened by the other two electoral events in store for the year: elections for the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory. The territories' respective electoral laws set polling day for August 27 in the NT and October 15 in the ACT, but they also provide for the dates to be rescheduled should the Prime Minister be rude enough to call an election of his own for the same day. In that case, the ACT election would be delayed until January, while the NT election would be rescheduled for an alternative date two months earlier or later. Taking all the other considerations into account, Turnbull has little reason to offend local sentiment by following such a course. Very likely he spoke truly when he said he was "expecting" the election would be held in September or October -- by which he most probably meant September 3, 10 or 17, or perhaps October 8 at a pinch.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

17 thoughts on “Poll Bludger: and the next federal election will be held on …

  1. Norman Hanscombe

    Whenever he goes Turnbull has a winner in the issue of the public’ belief there’s a need to impose greater oversight on union officials.
    Perhaps that’s why the usual suspect Crikey-philes aren’t venturing on to this thread?

  2. CML

    As far as your last paragraph is concerned, I hope you are correct. By that time even those with half a brain should have been able to work out that Talcum Malcum is just Tony Abbott in a more expensive suit!!

  3. Jaybuoy

    @nh.. It’s such a winner that the report got thrown out with the trash when no one was paying attention..the only interest in this report is the redacted section and the only real scandal is the millions wasted on an inquiry that should have been held into phoenixing ..

  4. John Anderson

    Unless PM Turnbull wants to lose a Minister [Sussan Ley] or buy a brawl with the Nationals, or both, he will not hold an election in March. The Writs would have to be issued before the NSW redistribution is finalised on 25 February 2016. The seats of Farrer and Riverina would have to be combined to ensure that 47 seats are in place. WA’s new boundaries with the extra seat, are finalised. The earliest date for an election with new NSW boundaries would be 2 April. Turnbull would not be concerned that Easter is the week before. He could also select april 9 or 16.

  5. AR

    Thanks to Bill, & [email protected], for such erudite & thoughtful material.
    I’m going to have to chew it over again but methinks (nod to theJames)late April.
    Perhaps Autumn when the olde worlde begins to die off?

  6. zut alors

    One would hope that by September even halfwits would be aware Emperor Turnbull is wearing policy clothes originally tailored by Abbott.

  7. Norman Hanscombe

    zut alors, those not, as you call them, “halfwits” are already more aware who best qualifies for the Emperor’s New Clothes tag, and they’re NOT any of your picks.

  8. AussieAchmed

    Turnbull will want to go soon and well before the union officials referred by the right wing Commissioner are having no charges laid or charges dropped by the DPP

  9. David Hand

    Gotta love these “Turnbull equals Abbott” posts. You guys are great!

    Another compelling reason why there will not be an early election is that I reckon no one on any side of politics has selected candidates for NSW electorates. They are all holding off until the boundary changes come into force. Pre-selections will then take place, probably April.

    Were Turnbull to call a March / April election, everyone would do a rushed job of selecting candidates on the existing boundaries and it would be utter chaos all round.

  10. Steve777

    If Malcolm decides to delay, the Murdochracy and the shock-jockracy will allow him a free pass. John Howard held the 2007 election 46 days after the anniversary of the previous election, which I don’t recall was an issue. It seems unlikely that we’ll have an election before the Budget. Assuming that the Government brings down a remotely responsible budget, they might want to have a bit of a buffer before the election. I think a date in November is on the cards if Malcoml doesn’t rush to the polls quickly and run on ‘union thuggery’.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details