Bill Shorten’s speech in infrastructure investment today is both a strong bid by Labor to claim infrastructure from Malcolm Turnbull, a prime minister who has made public transport a key part of his personal brand, and a further evolutionary step in making infrastructure investment less political and more transparent in Australia at a time when the level of investment is at near-decade lows.

Shorten’s speech centres on a significant new role for Infrastructure Australia, the infrastructure investment assessment body established by Anthony Albanese under the Rudd government, which has lain fallow for most of the last two years while the Coalition (ostensibly) retooled it.

Under Labor’s plan, Infrastructure Australia would administer a $10 billion investment fund that would invest in infrastructure projects via several mechanisms — loan guarantees, loans or  equity investment — and then sell its interests once a project was underway, with the intention of earning a commercial return. The model, plainly, is the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, established by the Gillard government, which has been successfully investing in renewable energy projects despite the Coalition’s efforts to shut it down. The long-term goal is that IA would become, in effect, self-funding with its commercial returns, and would oversea a long-term “pipeline” of projects (presumably Labor is deliberately using the word the Reserve Bank and the International Monetary Fund have called for in their comments on infrastructure).

Labor has identified a number of projects, including a rail link to the Badgerys Creek airport in Sydney, the Melbourne Metro, the Cross River Rail project in Brisbane, the Midland Highway in Tasmania and the electrification of the Gawler Line in Adelaide, that will be priorities under the new process. However, if those projects don’t meet IA’s assessment for commercial viability, they will fall out of that process — although they may still be funded under more traditional government grants programs.

IA will not be completely independent — ministers will still have the final say on projects, but Labor has committed to transparency of the business cases for each project, meaning political interference in IA’s investment selection process will be clear.

Labor’s policy is significant for a number of reasons. Shorten is upfront that traditional grants programs for infrastructure investment aren’t going to be enough to drive sufficient infrastructure projects, and that leveraging private sector investment is therefore crucial. That view in itself is hardly new — governments have been saying for 20 years that they need to encourage private investment in infrastructure, but there’s a sorry trail of poor forecasts, unused tunnels and failed build–own–operate–transfer schemes that show how unsuccessful they’ve been in delivering that. But former treasurer Joe Hockey developed an answer that Labor lacked: his asset recycling program, where by the proceeds from privatisation by state governments were used to leverage more investment in infrastructure elsewhere. Now Labor has its own, commercially driven policy response to the challenge of delivering private sector investment.

It’s also an evolutionary step in the establishment of Infrastructure Australia as not merely a potent policy force in infrastructure but a significant operator itself in the market. Shorten compares it to the Reserve Bank, a little inappropriately, because the RBA is entirely independent of government, but between the commitment (which still has to be implemented) to greater transparency and its own investment mandate, this is a significant step away from traditional political infrastructure funding arrangements.

The other significance is more subtle and (perhaps deliberately) undiscussed by Shorten: by aiming for a commercial return, the $10 billion fund will prioritise projects that generate revenue streams. Pricing is the great problems of infrastructure policy when it comes to publicly used projects, and especially roads — and one of the key reasons why previous efforts to leverage private investment have struggled. IA will gravitate towards projects that charge users — of which Australia needs many more, although the financial mechanisms that IA will have at its disposal like loan guarantees also mean other projects with less obvious revenue streams may also fit the investment mandate.

One other thing that’s interesting about Shorten’s speech: it’s almost entirely devoid of criticism of the Coalition, despite taking its cue from the collapse in infrastructure investment under Tony Abbott. Indeed, it barely mentions the government. In the new, less combative atmosphere of the Turnbull era, that’s wise from Labor. Their best chance of competing with Turnbull is on policy, and this is a significant addition.

Peter Fray

Help us keep up the fight

Get Crikey for just $1 a week and support our journalists’ important work of uncovering the hypocrisies that infest our corridors of power.

If you haven’t joined us yet, subscribe today to get your first 12 weeks for $12 and get the journalism you need to navigate the spin.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey