Bill Shorten’s opposition has recently waved through a series of laws that dramatically extend the power of the executive government and its law enforcement and intelligence agencies, at the expense of citizens. Why? Out of fear of being seen as weak on national security.
Opposition to the government on its ever-more draconian counter-terrorism laws has instead come from a rough alliance of the Greens, the libertarian right and, on the citizenship issue, classical liberals within the Liberal Party who are under the illusion that the current version of their party stands for individual rights, small government and checks and balances on executive power. Labor has forfeited its role as an opposition entirely. (Of course, none of this bipartisanship has stopped Tony Abbott from relentlessly, and often effectively, arguing that Labor is soft on terrorism.)
There's more to Crikey than you think.
Get more and save 50%.
But yesterday Shorten gave another insight into why Labor has so readily rolled over on national security. His repetition, virtually word for word, of the response of government ministers whenever they are embarrassed about revelations relating to intelligence agencies, or border protection, or any other matter that can be tenuously linked to national security — that he doesn’t comment on such matters — shows how bipartisan is the determination of the major parties to keep Australians in the dark about what the executive and its agencies do out of the public gaze.
The Shorten-led opposition has had it good for a long, long time. But now its flaws are becoming apparent: poor judgement, cowardice, an inability to communicate anything remotely nuanced, and a readiness to treat Australians with contempt when it comes to national security.