“‘Nope, Nope, Nope’: Tony Abbott’s blunt response when asked if Australia would accept hundreds of desperate refugees pictured stranded on rotting boats off Indonesia.”

That was the depiction of Australia yesterday in the Daily Mail. This message has now reverberated around the world. An academic interviewed by Malaysia’s Utusan described Australia as “cruel”.

The Jakarta Globe pulled no punches yesterday with “Indonesia Condemns Australian Refugee Hypocrisy”.

Newsweek Japan castigated the treatment of Manus Island camp inmates as “cruel and humiliating”. The journal noted that Australia is “a wide open, low population density country … yet Australia accepts an extremely small number of refugees compared with other advanced Western countries”.

Japan’s Nichigo Press ran a similarly critical analysis. It quoted refugee advocate David Mann saying, “the government is not only violating human rights” but is “denying Australians and the international community the right to know what it is doing”.

The New York Times ran an op-ed headed “Australia’s Rigid Immigration Barrier” with a harsh graphic depicting a razor-wire fence at sea. “The Abbott government’s strategy is to treat asylum-seekers who arrive by boat so terribly that they simply give up. Unconstrained by a bill of rights, Canberra has implemented a suite of harsh policies to this end.”

The Times was scathing of the Cambodia solution: “Refugees have been told of Cambodia’s ‘wealth of opportunity,’ and offered resettlement packages in exchange for volunteering. But the pitch is a fantasy. In November, Human Rights Watch reported on Cambodia’s failure to support refugees already living there …”

Russia’s Unification journal highlighted the cruelty towards children: “Australian authorities are accused of deprivation of liberty of children … This is a violation of Australia’s international obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”

Norway’s Dagbladet expressed a concern felt acutely in Europe: “Australia, which paradoxically is exclusively populated by immigrants apart from their own indigenous Aborigines, is notorious for its uncompromising policies towards boat people.”

Le Monde in France asked the question: “Australia avoids asylum seeker drownings, but at what cost?” It continued, “Canberra boasts that no migrant has died at sea in 2014 and 2015, attributing this change to the migratory tightening by Tony Abbott’s conservative government.”

The author is clearly sceptical: “But what happens exactly in these waters is difficult to verify. Tony Abbott compares his fight against illegal arrivals to a war situation and information on the operation is classified ‘defence secret’. If no boat has landed, this does not mean that no-one has tried.”

Some Italian journals approved Abbott’s approach. An opinion piece in L’Ultima Ribattuta claimed that to Europe’s refugee problem, “the solution seems to come from Australia”. The piece quoted Abbott’s mantra: “If you do not stop these boats you cannot stop the deaths at sea”. It concluded, “We hope this message reaches Italy and Brussels.”

L’Indro ran a similar line with the same Abbott quote, asserting “Canberra has the only effective strategy to capture human traffickers.”

Italy’s L’Espresso, in contrast, highlighted Europe’s broad rejection of Abbott’s advice. Its piece aired Australian independent MP Andrew Wilkie’s outrage at “men, women and children detained by force indefinitely” under “conditions which cause great suffering as well as severe physical and mental injuries”.

L’Espresso quoted Italian Admiral Marzano who rejects Abbott’s solution: “I’m a sailor who spent twenty years at sea. I intervene to help people. A ship in distress, whether it is a boat full of immigrants or a merchant ship, should be assisted.”

And Abbott’s “nope, nope, nope” wasn’t the only reason Australia was in the world headlines. The Washington Post ran a story yesterday on the reversal of the migration trend from New Zealand to Australia: “For the first time in 24 years, 100 more people moved east from Australia to New Zealand than moved in the opposite direction.” It linked this with “Australia’s economy stumbling and New Zealand’s improving”.

The Wall Street Journal headed a report on another of Australia’s fractious regional relationships, “Australia Risks Snubbing China Over Military Drill”. It continued, “Australia hasn’t yet invited China to a major military exercise in the Pacific involving both Japan and the U.S. for the first time, risking a backlash from Beijing amid escalating territorial tensions in the South China Sea.”

The Washington Post ridiculed Australia with the story “Pup-roar: Johnny Depp’s dogs escape Australian death threat”. As did countless other journals and radio and TV outlets across the world.

The derision generated by the inept handling of that issue by Agriculture Minister Barnaby Joyce was exemplified hilariously by British-American comedian John Oliver in another classic Last Week Tonight report.

Not the first time, unfortunately, an Oliver humiliation of the Abbott administration has gone viral worldwide. Will it be the last?

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW