Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Federal

Apr 14, 2015

What Abbott has delivered (or promised) to his IPA mates

Freelance journalist Andrei Ghoukassian and former Crikey senior journalist Andrew Crook have sifted through all 100 policies promoted by the Institute of Public Affairs and found the Abbott government has promised quite a few of them.

Share

When Crikey first looked at the Institute of Public Affairs’ 100-point wishlist as compared to Tony Abbott’s election promises, we found the IPA had a pretty good strike rate. Of the 100 policies put forward by the IPA, 11% had been achieved or explicitly promised, 31% had been partially achieved or promised and 58% were unlikely or ruled out.

With the Abbott government now past the halfway point of its first term, we thought it’d be an excellent time to review the list and see how many of the IPA’s policies the Coalition followed up on. This time around, we think those at the IPA have even more reason to be happy: 20% of their policies have been fully or partially implemented; 15% remained promised, partially promised, or at least somewhat likely to be adopted; while 65% are unlikely, abandoned, or just plain dead in the water. We are assessing the first 25 today, with the rest to follow this week.

The nine victories include the axing of the carbon and mining taxes, the abolition of the department of climate change, the scrapping of Abbott’s paid parental leave scheme, ceasing assistance to the car industry, defunding the Australia Network, and ruling out gaming-related mandatory pre-commitment.

Some things just didn’t fly: the battle over the Racial Discrimination Act proved costly and changes to 18c were abandoned, while both the public and medicos hammered mooted changes to Medicare. The IPA called on Abbott to be more than just a moderate Liberal PM, urging him to enact radical Whitlam-like reforms in his first term. If it weren’t for a hostile Senate blocking Abbott’s more extreme agenda, the IPA might have seen more of its policies signed into law.

In this first of a four-part series, we look at the first 25 policies, including the Clean Energy Fund and good ole 18c.

1. Repeal the carbon tax, and don’t replace it. It will be one thing to remove the burden of the carbon tax from the Australian economy. But if it is just replaced by another costly scheme, most of the benefits will be undone.

It took almost a year in government, but Tony Abbott managed to finally convince a hostile Senate to repeal the carbon tax in July last year. It was Clive Palmer and his three PUP senators who caused the most trouble for the Coalition, with Palmer appearing to quite enjoy the protracted negotiations. The Coalition’s alternative Direct Action policy currently has less momentum than a giant tortoise after a big meal, so a carbon tax replacement looks some time away.

STATUS: COMPLETE

2. Abolish the Department of Climate Change

Joe Hockey first slated the department’s evisceration on Lateline in August 2011. But it was abolished by Labor earlier this year after Kevin Rudd’s leadership non-challenge and its functions rolled into the Industry Department, with the Energy Efficiency component moved to the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism. In March 2013, then-opposition climate action spokesperson Greg Hunt said that climate bureaucrats would merge together with the Environment Department when the Coalition assumed office. Following the election, the Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education was dissolved, and the Department of the Environment established.

STATUS: COMPLETE

3. Abolish the Clean Energy Fund

Way back in October 2011, Coalition finance spokesperson Andrew Robb confirmed the planned $10 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC) would be abolished, calling it a “reckless slush fund”. CEFC chair Jillian Broadbent pleaded with the new Abbott government after the election, citing its 7.3% return as reason to retain it. Then-assistant treasurer Arthur Sinodinos countered that if the CEFC was indeed profitable, it didn’t need the government’s support to survive. The recently released energy white paper reiterated the government’s desire to cut the CEFC, but for the moment it remains operational.

STATUS: PROMISED

4. Repeal section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act

Abbott first mooted changes to 18c in August 2012 in a speech to the IPA after he dined with popular News Corporation polemicist Andrew Bolt, who had been found guilty of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act by the Federal Court. But not even the appointment of IPA regular Tim Wilson as Human Rights Commissioner could save this policy from the scrapheap. After months of hand-wringing, Abbott finally dumped the proposed changes after realising the public — and the many ethnic communities that make it up — strongly supported the existing laws.

STATUS: ABANDONED

5. Abandon Australia’s bid for a seat on the United Nations Security Council

In July 2010, Abbott first said he would abandon the bid if he won that year’s election, but he was stuck with the seat for until the end of 2014. As it turned out, the Coalition had a rare public success when Julie Bishop was able to use Australia’s position on the council to push strongly for a full investigation into the shooting down of MH17, which killed 38 Australians.

STATUS: EXPIRED

6. Repeal the renewable energy target

Abbott said in April 2013 he would conduct a “serious review” of the RET, which mandates 20% of energy be drawn from renewable sources by 2020. The review was released in mid-2014, finding that the RET’s target was too high in light of falling demand for electricity. The 20% figure for renewables is still being debated in Parliament, but a full repeal is looking extremely unlikely.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

7. Return income taxing powers to the states

Former Western Australian treasurer Christian Porter publicly advocated for a return of some taxation powers to the states back in 2013. However, the focus of taxation reform has turned strongly toward the question of whether to raise or broaden the GST to cover the states’ revenue shortfalls. The carve up of GST revenue continues to cause arguments: Western Australia feels so hard done by they have essentially threatened to secede. But while the fight over GST share will be bitter, the chance of actual disengagement from the eastern states is small. South Australia has also made overtures about reintroducing old taxes to help cover shortfalls, but we can’t see Abbott decentralising income taxes.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

8. Abolish the Commonwealth Grants Commission

As usual, it’s Western Australia agitating for changes to the GST distribution, claiming it has a revenue shortfall due to falling iron ore prices. While Abbott has expressed some sympathy, he’s called on state premiers to co-operate. “If the states are not happy with the distribution formula, this is something that they need to be able to sit down and sort out amongst themselves like responsible, adult governments,” he said.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

9. Abolish the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Given that Abbott charged the ACCC with policing price falls when the carbon tax was abolished, this was, and remains, highly unlikely.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

10. Withdraw from the Kyoto Protocol

Abbott’s government has stayed committed to Australia’s target of an emissions cut of 5% cut below 2000 levels by 2020, but is yet to nominate a target beyond that date despite a major UN climate change meeting approaching in December.

STATUS: POSSIBLE

11. Introduce fee competition to Australian universities

The plan to deregulate university fees in Australian universities was announced as part of the Coalition’s first budget in 2014. While supported by the Business Council and Group of Eight universities, the policy sparked national student protests and fierce debate about the effect higher fees would have on accessibility. Clive Palmer declared that his senators would oppose the bill, and Education Minister Christopher Pyne has been struggling with a truculent Senate crossbench ever since. The bill failed has been voted down twice by the Senate with the help of independents Nick Xenophon and Ricky Muir, and with the Go8 recently retracting its support, Pyne appears to be fighting a losing battle.

STATUS: PROMISED

12. Repeal the National Curriculum

The government announced a review of the national curriculum in January 2014, and it was released last October with recommendations to pare subjects back to focus on key learning areas and simplify the system for parents. Last month Pyne announced that the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority would begin implementing the changes following endorsement from state education ministers. Although the curriculum is being altered, the government has not suggested its repeal.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

13. Introduce competing private secondary school curriculums

See above.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

14. Abolish the Australian Communications and Media Authority

Kyle Sandilands’ support for this initiative has not been picked up by the conservative side of politics.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

15. Eliminate laws that require radio and television broadcasters to be “balanced”

There have been no whisperings around introducing this policy.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

16. Abolish television spectrum licensing and devolve spectrum management to the common law

Before the 2010 election, Abbott remarked that a decision to cut the TV licence fee for commercial networks was tantamount to a bribe. The Convergence Review recommended that the current system, where broadcasters pay a fixed proportion of their revenue, be abandoned and that a new regulator determine the actual value of the spectrum and charge an annual fee. In a second reading speech on the reduction in the license fees, Liberal Senator Simon Birmingham said he had “no concern” with the changes that would cut the fee to 4.5% of gross earnings. But scrapping the license system and auctioning the spectrum is something else entirely.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

17. End local content requirements for Australian television stations

Birmingham also said the Coalition supported changes to local content requirements that included digital channels, which could be interpreted as a watering down of the rules. But not really.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

18. Eliminate family tax benefits

Joe Hockey’s first budget went after family tax benefits, introducing a change to Part B that would eliminate payments once a family’s youngest child turns six, lowering of the income threshold to from $150,000 to $100,000, and freezing payments at current rates for two years. While Labor supported the lowering of the income threshold, the Senate crossbench has blocked the remaining changes. The upcoming May budget will reveal Hockey’s families package, but he has already flagged a simplification of the welfare payment system.

STATUS: PARTIAL

19. Abandon the paid parental leave scheme

Although this was one of Abbott’s signature policies, he eventually abandoned the plan in February at the height of speculation about his leadership.

STATUS: COMPLETE

20. Means-test Medicare

The Coalition’s first budget went some way to means testing Medicare through the introduction of a $7 co-payment for GP visits, capped at ten visits a year for concession card holders and children. Enormously unpopular with both the public and the medical fraternity, the policy was eventually abandoned in March with Abbott declaring it “dead, buried, and cremated”.

STATUS: ABANDONED

21. End all corporate welfare and subsidies by closing the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education

The Coalition dissolved the Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education, splintering it into the Department of Industry and the Department of the Environment soon after election. However, their functions remain essentially the same.

STATUS:  UNLIKELY

22. Introduce voluntary voting

While former Queensland Premier Campbell Newman launched a voluntary voting thought bubble back in 2013, this has not spread federally. It would be a boon for the Coalition because their supporters would probably be more likely to turn out to vote. State branches of the Liberal Party, especially the South Australian branch, support the shift, and radical Senator Cory Bernardi has openly blogged about it. Last year former Labor leader Mark Latham also joined in the fun, calling for voluntary voting in his book The Political Bubble, while Victorian Liberal MP Bernie Finn also questioned our voting laws following the state’s November election.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

23. End mandatory disclosures on political donations

The Coalition famously blocked John Faulkner’s reforms that would have accelerated the reporting cycle for donations and reduced the threshold back to $1000, rather than the current $11,500. A 2013 bill that promised increased public funding and a reduction in the donations threshold to $5000 was rejected by Abbott at the 11th hour after a day of talkback radio rage. With the NSW Liberals copping it at ICAC and Joe Hockey making the news for his fundraising techniques, loosening donation laws is unlikely to go down well a public that barely trusts politicians as it is.

STATUS: PARTIAL

24. End media blackout in final days of election campaigns

Given the Coalition cynically exploited the blackout to announce billions in last-minute cuts before the 2013 election, it seems it believes the current system is working just fine.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

25. End public funding to political parties

Liberal federal director Brian Loughnane tried to sneak through increased public funding (see above) so this doesn’t seem likely either. Abbott has expressed a dislike of increased public funding to political parties, but ending it is a different matter.

STATUS: UNLIKELY

The tally so far:

COMPLETE: 3
PROMISED: 2
ABANDONED: 2
EXPIRED: 1
UNLIKELY: 14
POSSIBLE: 1
PARTIAL: 2


*Tomorrow: Media ownership laws and assistance to the car industry

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

14 comments

Leave a comment

14 thoughts on “What Abbott has delivered (or promised) to his IPA mates

  1. SusieQ

    I’m sure you could also argue that Labour policies are beholden to the unions – a comparison would be interesting.
    What a ghastly bunch the IPA are.

  2. tonyfunnywalker

    Few realised that the undertaking by Abbott to adopt the IPA agenda was the policy manifesto of the elected government.
    Devoid of policies of its own other than 3 word slogans that were ultimately achieved at a great cost to an already weakening budget and to the chagrin of a duped electorate.
    This IPA wish list is largely responsible and the source of the plethora of Abbott’s lies, backflips, reversals and reruns, duplicity, bullying, nepotism, cronyism, blackmail, character assassination and malevolence that has become the hall mark of Abbott’s failing administration. The damage caused by the achievement of the IPA wish list is mounting as unemployment, a weakening economy with the AAA rating under siege and a divided society of increasingly impoverished “have nots’” while the “haves” prosper.
    Never again should a Government of any ideology be elected without a manifesto that is presented in its entirety before the election and openly debated in the media and where the electorate can make reasoned choices that their aspirations are taken into account not just those of plutocrats.
    Above all there needs to openness and honesty and that the Parliament ceases to be run by any secret self-serving oligarchy that stop at nothing to achieve their wish lists irrespective of the damage they cause to the economy and to Australian Society generally.

  3. bushby jane

    Item 5, I thought that the govt were thinking of trying for another stint on the United Nations Security Council because Julie Bishop enjoyed the limelight so much.
    Item 20, the Medicare copayment may not have eventuated but the govt’s freezing of GP’s rebate will have the same effect or worse, a fact that the media have not made much of.

  4. bushby jane

    Item 5, I thought that the govt were thinking of trying for another stint on the United Nations Security Council because Julie Bishop enjoyed the limelight so much.
    Item 20, the Medicare copayment may not have eventuated but the govt’s freezing of GP’s rebate will have the same effect or worse, a fact that the media have not made much of.

  5. Norman Hanscombe

    An expansively impressive Crikey summary, perhaps, but I look forward to the day Crikey responds to any of the significant issues I’ve sent which went though to the keeper ‘un-noticed’ including improving educational outcomes without relying on the perennial bleats we hear about more taxpayer funding being the ‘answer’.
    Perhaps the “Until the 12th of Never” lyrics provides the likely answer?

  6. Jill Baird

    On compulsory voting, how can we be sure a voluntary system would favour the Liberals? After all, Greens voters are the most highly educated, and I would guess the most committed.

  7. sang-froid

    Indeed, just look how the Victorians rolled over for the unions.

  8. Liamj

    Whenever writing about the sold souls shop a.k.a the IPA, journo’s should include a para on who supports it. In the same way, civilised countries prosecute not just the receiver but also the payer of bribes, not just the prostitute but also the procurer.

  9. Justin Harris

    Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) How disingenuous is this title, it gives the impression this is a think tank from the community when it is just another “Lobby Group” from big business, there are just so many of these groups around and they are front and centre in the media always spruiking what the government should do,”which always involves selling more public assets” We are seeing more of these groups in the MSM than government.

    We did not vote for these groups at the election and I fail to see why we must have them plastered across our tv screens when we turn them on only to see the IPA and related Hacks echoing what they want and when they want it.

    Lets start a micro-party called the ALP:- Anti Lobby Party.

  10. AR

    The abolition of compulsory voting has long been Minchin’s wet dream so it should be noted that, when we were granted this boon, it was a private member’s Bill, which passed both Chambers in a single day in 1926 if memory serves.
    It was a response to the physical distances of OZ making it too tiresome for the parties to garner the vote as remains common in UK – drive you to the polling place, cuppa tea & cake and a lift home, no probs and they still can’t get 70% turnout from 45M voters in a country the size of Victoria.

  11. klewso

    “Shhhh Adults in Charge ….. of Outsourcing Policy!”

  12. David Hand

    There is absolutely nothing in this story. There are all sorts of societies, groups and organisations who publicly express a view about what government policy should be. So taking a right of centre group and suggesting that the government is doing their bidding is absurd. The government is doing what right of centre governments do. If a lobby group shares some of the government’s values, that means absolutely nothing.

    It would be the same as a Labor government doing what a group like GetUp is advocating. Well, I’d expect them to. They’re both on the left side of politics.

  13. AR

    Thanks to OneHand for his usual fapping,nice to know that we may rest easy, nothing to see here, move along.
    Where would we be without such aloof magisterial oversight & insight to assure us that mudorc is in Holt St and all is Right with the world?

  14. David Hand

    hey AR,
    I do appreciate the way you hang on every comment I post. It makes me feel valued and appreciated.

Advertisement

https://www.crikey.com.au/2015/04/14/what-abbott-has-delivered-or-promised-to-his-ipa-mates/ == https://www.crikey.com.au/free-trial/==https://www.crikey.com.au/subscribe/

Show popup

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

Free Trial form on Pop Up

Free Trial form on Pop Up
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.