Feb 6, 2015

Crikey clarifier: is it time for term limits?

Clive Palmer thinks Australia's "shallow political gene pool" would be better diversified through the introduction of term limits. Is he onto something? Crikey intern Rowan Forster weighs the pros and cons.

Crikey Intern — The next generation of <em>Crikey</em> journalists.

Crikey Intern

The next generation of Crikey journalists.

Outgoing US President George W. Bush welcomes President-elect Barack Obama to the White House in 2009

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “Crikey clarifier: is it time for term limits?

  1. David Hand

    Well Palmer is a classic example of the shallow gene pool in politics. Term limits would still see him in parliament.

  2. klewso

    What was the Russian limit per customer, before “Putin on the fritz”?
    They couldn’t limit Junior Bush to one term either.

  3. Luke Hellboy

    What about if some of the Faulkner reforms were implemented and local branch members actually had a say in preselection of candidates or the direction of party policies? I guess we’d just see branch stacking via proxy votes. Some turds just won’t flush.

  4. AR

    Pity the term limit in the Benighted States didn’t apply to scions – the world would have been saved much trial & tribulation.

  5. JohnB

    Anybody for a term limit for Australia’s Head of State, ie QEII?

    Or, perhaps, for the whole Danish/German/Greek British Royal Family?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details