The Coalition government has introduced a lot of policy with potentially poor health outcomes. But there are alternatives, if we imagine them. They can be difficult for politicians to grasp, but there are examples of policies that promote health. South Australia is leading the way with its Health in All Policies approach.

Another attempt at a similar idea was the Wellbeing Manifesto. The World Health Organization has given guidance for governments on implementing these kinds of policies, an initiative led by Sir Michael Marmot, a British public health physician.

Famously, during a visit to Sweden, Marmot asked the Swedish Prime Minister, “Who is your health minister?”.

“We are all health ministers,” came the reply.

In this spirit, let’s wonder what would happen if all our current cabinet ministers were health ministers. (I’m using current ministers as examples, but if they were really promoting health, we might see a bit more diversity in the cabinet — perhaps as a result of a reshuffle coming soon).

Health Services Minister
Sussan Ley’s role would be renamed “Health Services Minister” and would be responsible for organising the health system to get the best health outcomes for users of the service (and one of her KPIs would be making the services accessible for those who would benefit from using them, but don’t). She would get no extra marks for making the service cheaper if it didn’t also improve health. That is not what sustainable means!

Minister for Health (Environment)
Greg Hunt would primarily be responsible for ensuring that Australia worked to prevent climate change and brought other countries along, too, emphasising the likely devastating health effects. He would also ensure that other threats to health and the natural environment were minimised, and that everyone had access to areas of natural bushland.

Minister for Health (Economy and Funding)
Formerly known as the Treasurer, Joe Hockey would be responsible for monitoring and reporting on inequality as a key cause of poor health, a recommendation that could come from a recent Senate inquiry. The tax system would be measured on its fairness and used to make it easier for people to make choices about their own lives, especially those whose lack of income normally prevents them from making choices. He would ensure that everyone was paid a living wage.

Minister for Health (Law)
George Brandis would no longer be the Attorney-General, partly to do away with confusing plurals. His responsibilities would be to ensure that everyone had the right not to be hounded by bigots, and that human rights (including a right to free speech) applied to everyone, not just those with newspaper columns or those rich enough to afford lawyers.

Minister for Health (Immigration)
Peter Dutton would have to ensure that those under his guardianship were treated in a way that was not detrimental to their future health. While this includes drowning at sea, it would also include death by murder, death by delays to routine medical treatment, and death by a life so awful it forces people to self-harm. He would promote inclusion of asylum seekers into Australian communities to improve everyone’s health. The Minister for Health (Law) would constantly be in his ear to prevent him from jeopardising community inclusion.

Minister for Health (Education)
Christopher Pyne would have responsibility for ensuring that all children were literate, and would engage families of all backgrounds in doing this. He would be responsible for ensuring especially that all children had the chance of a good education wherever they went to school, whatever their income, and that university was an option for them, if they wished.

Minister for Health (Employment)
Eric Abetz would devote his time to ensuring that all those capable of working were able to do so, and that they had secure employment. Those not in work would not be treated punitively, but helped to develop skills for both job-seeking and subsequent work. Adding to their stress through punitive measures and low income only causes ill health.

Minister for Health (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs)
This minister would have a slightly changed remit. She (because all the others seem to be he!) would be responsible for ensuring that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people had easy access to other ministers to ensure policies that affected Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people included them in policymaking.

Minister for Health (Transport)
Nominations are open for this minister, who will work with state counterparts to develop active forms of public transport. Roads would become clearer as more people moved to convenient, cheap, clean public transport and cycle-ways in all major cities and urban centres.

Minister for Health (Food)
There would be a dedicated minister for ensuring that everyone across the country had access to affordable, healthy food, and the means and knowledge to prepare it. This minister would have to think about health implications of policy and would be specifically mandated to challenge big food companies to be transparent on their labelling. The minister might also want to consider price signals on unhealthy foods.

Minister for Health (Maternity and Early Childhood)
As this is where so many of the health gains are to be made, why not have a specific minister to co-ordinate policy across government? The minister would ensure there was support for mothers during pregnancy, in establishing breast-feeding, and in pre-school literacy and education. This minister would have the power to influence other health ministers, such as Economy and Finance, Health Services and Education to ensure appropriate services were developed and funded.

Overseeing all of this would be the Prime Minister for Health, Tony Abbott, to ensure that the various other health ministers worked collaboratively with each other and with the states and territories and local councils to improve the nation’s health.

It may be that this all over-emphasises health at the expense of other outcomes. But an understanding of health as not being merely an absence of disease (or the community focus of the Aboriginal definition of health) shows that health outcomes are a marker of a functioning community.

I don’t expect any of this to appear in the next budget. I don’t know how I’d implement it, or even pay for it in the short term (I think there would be longer-term benefits on health expenditure and improved productivity, but that’s an arguable point).

What I do value is imagination — imagination about how we can do policy differently and not be bound to a narrow conception of government as managers of an economy, and ourselves as consumers.

This is a starting point for ideas about new policy and new ways of administering policy. Because the alternative makes me and everyone else sick.

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW